Houzz Logo Print
mxyplux

Is My System Completely Out of Date? Tired?

10 years ago


Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz 3.00 GHz

Installed RAM 4.00 (3.24 GB Usable)

W/7 HOme 64 Bit


33.5GB Free of 74.5 GB = 55% Full HD


CPU usage hits 100% on most operations. Web sites are slow loading etc. HD is only about half full. Several years old now. W/7 Home Premium. I've never been sure my comp was really strong enough for W/7 but it did come with and ran good with XP Pro.


Only thing I can figure filling up the HD is the Windows Updates. Only 227Mb of pics - I don't keep many - no gigantic files. Running both Adblock+ and Adfender. Turning them off doesn't seem to make a diffrunc. Is my old outfit just getting tired?

Comments (29)

  • 10 years ago
    last modified: 10 years ago

    BM

  • 10 years ago

    Well let's see. (This is going to be fun).

    Yes it's internet sites slow loading and changing pages etc 10-15 sec. Onboard stuff runs OK.

    =========

    2 browsers: IE11 and Maxthon v4.4.7.3000

    Same problem with both browsers. Got Google Chrome on board for a spare - never use it.

    Virtually no add ons just adblock+ on IE it's built into Maxthon makes it an even 1.

    Hist and cookies clun out regular

    No new programs

    no new hardware

    1 anti virus - Avast

    msconfig start up 7: Intel igfxpers, Intel hkcmd, MS Sidebar, Rainlendar(calendar), WinPatrol, Avast, Adfender.

    Processes 63

    computer noise normal fan no gravel in the differential

    Case clun out couple times a year (got air filters on too) never much in there.

    Process temp ????? My temp checking app was for XP never bothered with on W/7 I just now downloaded Core-Temp and tried to check it but it just read 0ºC - tad bit low? so I ejected it. Try sumthon else. Just feeling the top of the case (HP DC7600 sff) feels like 100ºF (slightly warm) so CPU can't be too far from that.



  • Related Discussions

    Heat Pump: replace compressor or get new complete system

    Q

    Comments (3)
    If I did not know better I would swear that this info was about me. In any case I am in the same ship. Last Oct I replaced the accumulator at the cost of $800 and then last Thurs the compressor died. Well I am hard pressed to put another one in as the system is 12yrs old. so now I have a 10seer unit and that is out of date. Seems to me that I am getting a new system. Problem is which one. I am in Mobile Al so the Heat pump is pretty good here. I have 3 proposals. 1- 13seer $4838 Merv 10 filter sys. Or #2 15seer $4990 merv 10 or #3 16 seer 2stage cooling and Air Handler with Var spd blower...$7040. So there is a $2000 diff here and I do not know if I am going to get 2k worth of savings to warrant..Help!!! BTW that is total prices.
    ...See More

    Complete system replacement. Cooling always substandard

    Q

    Comments (3)
    Yes, the increased square footage is due to the addition of the basement, which is only partially finished. Thus, only some of the additional area is conditioned. The basement floor is a slab six feet below grade. Uninsulated block walls for the unheated area, block walls with wood framing, R-11 and carpeting for the finished portion. Uninsulated partition wall between the two spaces. Single pane, metal framed windows from 1968 all around. See attachment for basement floor plan. Contractor 1 states that basement trunks are oversized and require five ton blower for proper cooling.This is the smallest unit he could find that provided a five ton blower. He choose a two stage unit to best match needed load using first stage. As stated in my original posting, cooling to second floor has always been poor. Current equipment supports up to four ton cooling, I believe. I cannot comment on Contractor 2, as I have yet to speak with him. Furnace is located in the basement. My father hates making exterior penetrations, and will not permit the running of the PVC pipe required for the higher efficiency units. It's just the way he is. We need to stay with the current flue to chimney routing. Plus, from his perspective, he likely will not live long enough to recoup the higher cost of more efficient equipment.
    ...See More

    Our new PAX system (mostly complete)

    Q

    Comments (19)
    We have stocked them with clothes and they are working really well. I didn't get the wooden doors all painted before it got cold, so I haven't installed them yet. I did install the mirror doors in the middle units. I am really happy with them. I'm using them in different ways than I expected. For instance, we put in 2 wide, wooden drawers above the wire shoe drawer in my closet. I had been using them both for jeans and t-shirts. When the weather got cold I put the t shirts in a storage box that fits into the shelves at the top of the unit, and left 1 drawer for jeans. The other drawer is now holding my boots. They lay flat, which is great! I fit 2 pr of long boots in there and 2 pr of calf- height boots as well. I wouldn't have expected to use that drawer for boots but it works well and I wear them more because I can see them better (they aren't at the bottom of a dark closet. The only thing I don't like is that my fav pants hangers are thick at the top. They clamp the bottom cuff of pants and are over 1" wide. Those take up a lot of space and when I have too many extras in there it feels crowded. Otherwise, it's working well for both DH and I.
    ...See More

    Kitchen became dated before completion

    Q

    Comments (73)
    Apologies for having skimmed just a bit of the first bit of this discussion. To the part where someone said something like "I've never seen anyone on GW renovate just to 'impress the neighbors'" or some-such. Actually, I can think of at least one very visible and vocal person who was candidly all about impressing and only impressing; she did not cook and had the vastest kitchen ever. Vast and beautiful and FBOW completely in scale with the rest of her house which it turns out she was building as well. It was just amaze-balls. As was she, and she was beloved and an active, helpful contributor and very eclectic, a real character. And definitely not my type, but the spread of experience, need, goals, abilities, style, aim, M.O. etc -- it's this broad range stitched together by an attitude of wanting to help others and share -- that's really a hallmark of this forum, IMO. Not even necessarily an obsession of function over form or even the other way around. Just a desire to help construct an aesthetically coherent whole with shifting starting conditions.
    ...See More
  • 10 years ago
    last modified: 10 years ago

    BM

  • 10 years ago

    Are you sure about those specs on your hard drive? That's a very tiny drive. My 8 year old desktop running Vista is 500GB.

  • 10 years ago

    Yeah, the drive size (75GB???) seems like a major mismatch w/the other hardware. Is that the whole drive or just a partition? My box is similar but came w/a 1 TB drive (1000 GB). If that's really the drive size, it's certainly a major bottleneck -- my Win7 alone takes up 160 GB!

  • 10 years ago

    Ya, Hd is nominal 80g. New modem. ATT DSL. Wired. No router - old one died a while back. Got this from Geek.com $125 WITH shipping XP Pro Refurbished. Really had no need for a bigger HD. They went belly up - damn shame. So! Overnight I thunk of the following:

    2 items

    1.)I wonder if it is my download speed. Typically a site coughs right up but it takes 5-10 seconds to settle out till I can maneuver around like scroll down etc. Change page? same story 5-10 seconds.

    I checked down load speed on Geeks and also ATT sites got the same number. Down 1.3 Mbps Up 0.32Mbps. I then perused the ATT site (like pushing string) and there are 12 tiers of service. I believe mine is second lowest "up to 1.5 Mbps" cause that fits the test results. Labelled "express" service-Hah!)

    I can certainly afford a new comp and not cheap either but I'd want to make sure what the real problem is first.

    ================================

    2.)Now here is what also flumoxes me; how to compare what I have vs a new outfit, for example:

    My comp: Intel Pentium 4 CPU 3.00GHz 3.00GHz (What's that 2nd 3.00GHz?)

    HP Elite Desk 800 G1 SFF: IntelCore i5-4590 with HD Graphics 45600 (3.3GHz,6MB cache, 4 cores)

    Huh? Presumably the Elite is newer and more betta but just how much?


  • 10 years ago

    I'm no expert but having just had an issue with slow web page loading, I have a couple thoughts. I didn't believe that I actually had a computer issue and that appears to be correct. My old DSL modem was just too old/slow. When it was replaced, all was well. Admittedly, I have a 10 mbit/sec connection while you have 1.5. That could explain everything except that when I was running 3m bits/sec. I usually got moderately good connection. In any case, I think a speed increase would be a far cheaper solution versus a new computer. I have an old win7 computer with half your memory, but twice your drive size with exactly the same current free space. It is now running fine. I just checked and almost no memory is being used while on firefox/gardenweb.

    No one has suggested a reason why poor internet issues would create 100% memory usage. I would guess that you have a separate issue, but perhaps someone would hazard an internet memory hogging method.

  • 10 years ago

    Your download speed is pretty marginal, so that could be part of the issue, especially because speeds vary. I supposedly have a 35Mbps connection, but a couple of times a year I can notice a lag, and the speed test can show as low as 1Mbps, which means I need to reboot the modem. You might benefit from a new modem: you could be having intermittent problems from it that slow it down to below what you just measured.

    In addition, that is a very strange hard drive size: the seller probably saved $10 by putting in that one rather than one ten times that size. Since that was a refurbished unit, originally running XP, that could be a 10 year old system, so I'd say it's time to get yourself a new computer. For less than $400 you can get a desktop tower (for example, from Dell) that will run circles around what you have.

  • 10 years ago

    Memory usage is around 33%. It's the CPU that's 100%


    Click Computer it coughs up Windows (C:) 39.5GB free of 74.5GB

    Right click C > properties it coughs up the pie chart with: 42.5 free of 74.5GB

    Who to believe? I'm leaning toward the pie chart.


    I guess its 80,024,170,496 bytes = 74.5GB. Nominal 80


    I'm sure this machine is left over from when 60-80 was huge - long time. That's about when Pentium 4 came along too if I recall correctly.


    I think first thing is to up the speed. That's cheep and would answer that question. I'm after a new outfit anyway but not w/o clearing this up. First things first.


    Now it's time to go enjoy watching the 49ers get their butts whipped. :)

  • 10 years ago

    Either-way the hard drive space does not appear to be an issue, windows only needs 15 to 20 percent free space that's 20% of 74GB and you're in range.


    If the cpu usage is 100percent then that's going to slow the works down. What's taking up the cpu.


    When you get a moment,

    Get Process Explorer
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896653.aspx

    Save it to your desktop then run it (Vista or Win7 - right click and Run As Administrator).
    1 View, Select Column, check Verified Signer, OK

    2 Options, Verify Image Signatures

    3 Click twice on the CPU column header to sort things by CPU usage with the big hitters at the top.
    Wait a minute then:

    File, Save As, Save. Open the file Procexp.txt on your desktop and copy and paste the text to a reply.


  • 10 years ago
    last modified: 10 years ago

    BM

  • 10 years ago

    ZEP- I'll work on that sometime this week.

    Bugs- 1 comp only. I wanted to illustrate why I personally can't compare my old fliver with the potentially new outfits as advertised. The INtel i5...was copied off HP website store of what looked like a comparable comp. Modem new last year - don't prove it's good tho.


  • 10 years ago
    last modified: 10 years ago

    BM

  • 10 years ago
    last modified: 10 years ago

    I have a mere 1.2 Mbit/s (download) DSL connection, and pages load fast enough on Firefox. YouTube videos usually run w/o pausing. However, alot of tweaks speed it up -- a huge host file to block ads & trackers, noscript & ghostery add-ons to block even more, the fastest custom DNS servers available (determined w/a DNS tester program). So I'm not sure why surfing is so slow, other than your small drive is necessitating alot of page-file swapping and/or your browser's having trouble caching pages.

    W/Linux it's simple to view how much page-file is being used with the "free" command, but not so simple w/Windows -- task manager isn't clear to me how much swap file is actually being used.

    IMO, I'd try a much bigger HD before buying a new box. Again, my box is similar except the much larger HD.

  • 10 years ago

    Hi ZEP. Here it is. Quite painless. :-) Ha d to split it into 2 pieces.

    First:

    Process CPU Private Bytes Working Set PID Description Company Name Verified Signer

    System Idle Process 74.00 0 K 24 K 0

    WmiPrvSE.exe 12.56 10,880 K 10,612 K 3472 WMI Provider Host Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    explorer.exe 5.47 54,988 K 45,388 K 2356 Windows Explorer Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    procexp64.exe 2.70 25,516 K 45,996 K 7428 Sysinternals Process Explorer Sysinternals - www.sysinternals.com (Verified) Microsoft Corporation

    sidebar.exe 1.45 74,288 K 27,580 K 2124 Windows Desktop Gadgets Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    taskmgr.exe 0.67 3,108 K 9,208 K 6132 Windows Task Manager Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    AvastSvc.exe 0.64 88,400 K 42,980 K 1056 avast! Service AVAST Software (Verified) AVAST Software a.s.

    Interrupts 0.49 0 K 0 K n/a Hardware Interrupts and DPCs

    svchost.exe 0.43 107,556 K 104,216 K 864 Host Process for Windows Services Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    csrss.exe 0.38 19,304 K 11,780 K 420 Client Server Runtime Process Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    System 0.38 132 K 440 K 4

    svchost.exe 0.35 41,560 K 39,132 K 924 Host Process for Windows Services Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    node.exe 0.21 23,644 K 17,660 K 1392 Evented I/O for V8 JavaScript Joyent, Inc (No signature was present in the subject) Joyent, Inc

    MAHostService.exe 0.08 1,620 K 612 K 1344 MAHostService Alcatel-Lucent (No signature was present in the subject) Alcatel-Lucent

    lsass.exe 0.04 5,088 K 6,324 K 480 Local Security Authority Process Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    AvastUI.exe 0.03 21,872 K 19,236 K 1916 avast! Antivirus AVAST Software (Verified) AVAST Software a.s.

    Rainlendar2.exe 0.03 18,248 K 13,824 K 2188 Rainlendar2 (No signature was present in the subject)

    AdFender.exe 0.02 23,688 K 16,144 K 1116 AdFender AdFender, Inc. (Verified) AdFender

    wmpnetwk.exe 0.01 12,180 K 11,260 K 2764 Windows Media Player Network Sharing Service Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    MasSvc.exe 0.01 2,224 K 2,632 K 2028 Maxthon App Store Service Maxthon Inc. (Verified) Maxthon (Asia) Limited.

    taskhost.exe 0.01 20,832 K 15,188 K 2924 Host Process for Windows Tasks Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    SASCORE64.EXE < 0.01 1,476 K 508 K 1312 Core Service SUPERAntiSpyware.com (Verified) SUPERAntiSpyware.com

    svchost.exe < 0.01 161,708 K 21,884 K 2196 Host Process for Windows Services Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    svchost.exe < 0.01 32,204 K 10,740 K 916 Host Process for Windows Services Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    MaxthonAppStore.exe < 0.01 7,088 K 432 K 3428 Maxthon App Store Maxthon Inc. (Verified) Maxthon (Asia) Limited.

    MaxthonAppStore.exe < 0.01 7,412 K 180 K 1208 Maxthon App Store Maxthon Inc. (Verified) Maxthon (Asia) Limited.

    WinPatrol.exe < 0.01 3,380 K 4,564 K 2848 WinPatrol System Monitor BillP Studios (Verified) BillP Studios

    notepad.exe < 0.01 1,500 K 4,984 K 5876 Notepad Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    csrss.exe < 0.01 2,228 K 2,108 K 368 Client Server Runtime Process Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    MaxthonUpdateSvc.exe < 0.01 5,264 K 5,104 K 2076 Maxthon (Verified) Maxthon (Asia) Limited.

    MaxthonAppstoreSvc.exe < 0.01 4,164 K 4,688 K 1848 Maxthon (Verified) Maxthon (Asia) Limited.

    WmiPrvSE.exe 7,468 K 10,932 K 6100 WMI Provider Host Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    winlogon.exe 2,976 K 484 K 536 Windows Logon Application Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    wininit.exe 1,608 K 220 K 408 Windows Start-Up Application Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    UpdaterService.exe 1,408 K 2,080 K 1636 Updater Service Acer Incorporated (Verified) Acer Incorporated


  • 10 years ago

    Hi ZEP. Here it is. Quite painless. :-) Ha d to split it into 2 pieces.

    Second:

    unsecapp.exe 1,764 K 2,276 K 3660 Sink to receive asynchronous callbacks for WMI client application Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    UninstallMonitor.exe 6,916 K 1,636 K 4000 IObit (Verified) IObit Information Technology

    TrustedInstaller.exe 41,368 K 16,364 K 324 Windows Modules Installer Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    taskhost.exe 9,364 K 2,020 K 3116 Host Process for Windows Tasks Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    taskeng.exe 1,808 K 5,036 K 5684 Task Scheduler Engine Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    svchost.exe 5,304 K 5,540 K 724 Host Process for Windows Services Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    svchost.exe 4,136 K 716 K 3852 Host Process for Windows Services Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    svchost.exe 10,740 K 7,292 K 1224 Host Process for Windows Services Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    svchost.exe 19,320 K 11,952 K 812 Host Process for Windows Services Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    svchost.exe 4,756 K 4,812 K 636 Host Process for Windows Services Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    svchost.exe 12,168 K 12,384 K 892 Host Process for Windows Services Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    svchost.exe 6,664 K 6,624 K 1428 Host Process for Windows Services Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    svchost.exe 2,640 K 1,968 K 112 Host Process for Windows Services Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    svchost.exe 4,708 K 2,232 K 1380 Host Process for Windows Services Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    spoolsv.exe 7,548 K 4,484 K 1196 Spooler SubSystem App Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    smss.exe 520 K 284 K 272 Windows Session Manager Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    services.exe 5,260 K 5,332 K 456 Services and Controller app Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    schtasks.exe 4,488 K 580 K 4328 Manages scheduled tasks Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    procexp.exe 2,608 K 6,888 K 6160 Sysinternals Process Explorer Sysinternals - www.sysinternals.com (Verified) Microsoft Corporation

    pcCMService.exe 2,008 K 1,360 K 2248 mcci+McciCMService Alcatel-Lucent (No signature was present in the subject) Alcatel-Lucent

    pcCMService.exe 1,724 K 1,160 K 2144 mcci+McciCMService Alcatel-Lucent (No signature was present in the subject) Alcatel-Lucent

    msiexec.exe 3,720 K 1,088 K 6112 Windows® installer Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    lsm.exe 2,640 K 1,832 K 488 Local Session Manager Service Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    igfxsrvc.exe 2,048 K 2,880 K 1920 igfxsrvc Module Intel Corporation (Verified) Intel Corporation

    igfxpers.exe 1,920 K 2,528 K 992 persistence Module Intel Corporation (Verified) Intel Corporation

    iexplore.exe 10,960 K 11,136 K 2544 Internet Explorer Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Corporation

    HPSIsvc.exe 1,740 K 1,372 K 1608 HP Smart-Install Service HP (Verified) Hewlett-Packard Company

    hkcmd.exe 1,848 K 1,664 K 1264 hkcmd Module Intel Corporation (Verified) Intel Corporation

    GWX.exe 3,584 K 1,020 K 3540 GWX Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    ftex.exe 364 K 72 K 4164 (Verified) Maxthon (Asia) Limited.

    ftex.exe 364 K 72 K 5928 (Verified) Maxthon (Asia) Limited.

    FCUpdateService.exe 1,168 K 412 K 1452 Foxit Cloud Safe Update Service Foxit Software Inc. (Verified) Foxit Software Incorporated

    Everything.exe 14,924 K 6,368 K 4376 Everything (No signature was present in the subject)

    dwm.exe 2,092 K 1,008 K 2448 Desktop Window Manager Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    conhost.exe 1,312 K 664 K 1464 Console Window Host Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    conhost.exe 1,028 K 372 K 4932 Console Window Host Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows

    agcp.exe 2,152 K 4,040 K 8056 agcp.exe Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Corporation


  • 10 years ago

    :-) :-)

    Bugs- as I understand it your new computers will have the following specs:

    Acer Aspire V5 573p-6896. Στρώση υπερλέπτων υπόθεση, Intel i5 @ της 1.66 GHz τετραπλού πυρήνα, mSATA 256gb SSD Drive για το λειτουργικό σύστημα και 500gb πρότυπο σκληρός οδηγώ για αποθήκευση, 12GB DDR3 RAM (maxed έξω), HD4400 γραφικών Intel, 15.6' IPS (In-Plane μεταγωγής) οθόνη αφής @ της 1920 x 1080 dpi, WiFi Bluetooth 4.0, LAN, έξοδο HDMI, 32 x 2.0 USB, 1 x 3,0 USB 4 ηχείων Dolby προώθησε την ακουστική v4, Extra-Lg Touchpad, αναγνώστη καρτών SD ,

    :-)

  • 10 years ago


    MEGO

    ;-)

  • 10 years ago

    OP's comments in Latin script aren't much easier to follow, that's why I've stayed out. The discussion is now off the road and into the weeds anyway.

  • 10 years ago

    Just a few things noticed,

    Are you using that sidebar.exe, it's for gadgets and looks high, I'd be disabling that. See link.
    sidebar.exe 1.45 74,288 K 27,580 K 2124 Windows Desktop Gadgets Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows
    http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/3255/disable-sidebar-desktop-gadgets-on-windows-7/
    ******************************************************************************************
    explorer.exe 5.47 54,988 K 45,388 K 2356 Windows Explorer Microsoft Corporation (Verified) Microsoft Windows
    That looks a bit high to me. (explorer.exe) is responsible for the desktop, icons, taskbar.
    As you use the computer check in the task manager to see what explorer.exe is doing and how much it might be increasing.

    Hopefully you have done a Malwarebytes scan.
    Everything else looks normal.
    I don't like anything IBOT, I would consider uninstalling anything related to it

    UninstallMonitor.exe 6,916 K 1,636 K 4000 IObit (Verified) IObit Information Technology

  • 10 years ago

    Thankyou.

    Gadgets is gone I was using it but had quit - no loss.

    IOBot is gone.

    Lotsa icons and stuff on the desktop. Could that cause explorer.exe to work overtime?

    I've looked the processes over many times nothing struck me as xs've.

    I will rerun Malawarebytes just to be thorough.

  • 10 years ago
    last modified: 10 years ago

    Mistaking Greek for Latin demonstrates an educational background that is sadly lacking.

  • 10 years ago

    "Lotsa icons and stuff on the desktop. Could that cause explorer.exe to work overtime?"

    It's possible, but I'm not for certain. My explore. exe is currently at 1500k. On my 64Bit win 7 it's at 10k via my task manager. With Firefox open.

    Yours is at 45,388 K . I wonder if yours has gone down with the fixing of sidebar.exe. It just seems a bit high to me...

  • 10 years ago
    last modified: 10 years ago

    I was talking about your posts from yesterday, with made up words and abbreviations. Maybe you thought it was clever? I didn't want to exert the needless effort to figure out what you were saying so I moved on, that was my comment.

    Languages? Sure. Other than English? Yes, I'm fluent in one, speak another very passably, and can converse adequately in two others. Yes, I recognized the Greek letters, it wasn't clear (as with the made up words) what you were trying to convey, I've lived and worked in Europe (not with a military or govt job and not with a college year abroad program) and have been to Greece.

    You?

    PS- your situation doesn't require much diagnosis. You have a machine with limited specs that's misbehaving and you can afford to buy a new one. That's the best approach in my view.

  • 10 years ago
    last modified: 10 years ago

    Please accept my apologies Snidely. My point was all those specs are Greek to me. Did you miss that? I thought it was clear & humorous - maybe not. After many years writing NACA/NASA technical type stuff I have rebelled and enjoy writing in something other than 3rd person impersonal with stilted phrasing and totally correct syntax, lexicon etc. that has to pass through an editorial committee of 4 with at least one of whom English was not their first language.

    I hardly think my mangled words are any worse than texting abbreviations and do believe they are phonetically correct and/or a good approximation to the spoken word which is certainly difrunt (different) from the written word,

    I was in Canada one time, 2 minutes. Long hair, beard, dog, rifle, jeep with California plates, wife with long black hair - nope - they turned us around. 1961.

    Thank you for your opinion. I agree.

    Edit: should have wrote: I agree that it should probly be replaced but not until the exact problem is pinned down.

  • 10 years ago

    Well as usual if you keep thrashing around enough with a problem it will get solved. Might be a lot of blind alleys along the way but eventually one will open up. I was running both AdFender and AdBlockPlus same time. I disabled AdBlockPlus and the problem has gone away. AdFender is still running, no apparent problems.

    So! It would seem my old blunderbuss is not to fault and my "Express" (Hah) DL speed of 1.3 Mbps is sufficient.

    Thank you all for contributing to and helping me with this amazing breakthru.

     

    Questions remain though.

    Can ADFender and ADBlock be ran same time w/o problems?

    Would this have happened with a newer machine?

    Would a faster download speed have overcome it?

    Would it happen if I disabled AdFender and left AdBlockPlus running instead?

    I will psyche these out when time allows.

     

     

     

     

  • 10 years ago

    I will mend my ways forthwith and from this day forward. I never thunk of - uh - hadn’t thought about it that way.

  • 10 years ago

    I have to agree wth Snidely: It seems sometimes like half the problems people ask for help with here are from downloading multiple things online that are supposed to do wonders for their computers...and end up messing things up even more, either because they dump all kind of toolbars and malware on one's system, or they fight with one another. Keeping things simple, using the tools that are already packaged with Windows, and having one good antivirus program and one or two on-demand malware programs is all most people need. As they say: Less is more.

Sponsored
WellCraft Kitchen and Bath
Average rating: 5 out of 5 stars69 Reviews
Virginia’s Full Service Design-Build Remodeling Company