Houzz Logo Print
ginny12first

Is this fair?

18 years ago

I am a big fan of mysteries. For several months, I have been plowing through all the Inspector Wexford mysteries by Ruth Rendell. After the early books in the series, I notice that she ends each book with a complicated solution to the mystery that requires information she has never supplied to the reader.

Is this fair?

I have always believed that mysteries were meant to be a sort of battle of wits between author and reader. The trick is for the reader to sift thru all the false leads and dead ends, and to pick up on perhaps one tiny tidbit, to come up with the solution to the puzzle. Some authors are better at this than others but I am feeling a bit miffed at Rendell for her deus ex machina endings--tho I must say I'm enjoying the Wexford series. What do you think?

Comments (10)