She may be having trouble mentally, most of us don't have an Am. Psychiatry Journal (I believe it's a monthly magazine) lying around. I have lots of medical books,some from when I was taking nursing course & others I bought as family often asks me if they have something wrong & I can look it up & tell them if they need to get to dr. But I've never needed anything on psychiatry,don't think it is on most people's reading list. Unless your bumper stickers say something like "I shoot first & ask questions later" or you are for a political person they don't like I can't imagine that a bumper sticker could provoke such a strong reaction. Do you know your neighbors on your street well? I think I would ask them if they have ever gotten anonymous letters about their bumper stickers or driving habits. She may have a grudge against people driving through "her" neighborhood. I sure wouldn't try to find her! If others have gotten letters, if they kept them might be time to go to police & let them know that you have gotten them in case anything else happens. I would file the letter away somewhere tho in case other things should happen but she may just be noisy difficult neighbor 1 street removed!!! Do you know anyone on her street? Might ask them if its a good neighborhood & if everyone gets along. I have a feeling if she knows you got upset she would be happy about it. Can you go out another way, people with mental problems can cause lot of problems so best to leave them alone (advice from cop in our area- relative had neighbor that way & even after relative breathed life back into the man's dad( heart attack) he still caused trouble)Hope this is end of it!!

USA Today just came out with a slightly different twist in their handling the story. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2014/01/03/gmo-genetically-modified-organism-facts-cheerios/4302121/ Of particular interest: " FDA is considering two citizen petitions it has received asking the agency to require GMO labeling." And "Why are some people concerned about GMOs? Critics say there are potential health effects (see next question) and environmental concerns surrounding GMOs. One of the supposed benefits of GMOs is that they should result in less herbicide spraying, since some plants have been modified to be herbicide resistant. However, over-reliance on these crops has led to the emergence of "super weeds" that are also more resistant to herbicides, requiring increased spraying, according to a University of Washington study." H.Kuska comment: the U. of Washington study link was given. It is: http://news.cahnrs.wsu.edu/2012/10/01/summary-of-major-findings-and-definitions-of-important-terms/ Of particular interest, to me, is the following: "Today’s major GE crops have increased overall pesticide use by 404 million pounds from 1996 through 2011 (527 million pound increase in herbicides, minus the 123 million pound decrease in insecticides). Overall pesticide use in 2011 was about 20% higher on each acre planted to a GE crop, compared to pesticide use on acres not planted to GE crops." And The biotechnology-seed-pesticide industry’s primary response to the spread of glyphosate-resistant weeds is development of new HT varieties resistant to multiple herbicides, including 2,4-D and dicamba. These older phenoxy herbicides pose markedly greater human health and environmental risks per acre treated than glyphosate. Approval of corn tolerant of 2,4-D is pending, and could lead to an additional 50% increase in herbicide use per acre on 2,4-D HT corn." H.Kuska comment: I could actually cut and paste much of the article, but instead I will simply suggest that everyone read the complete article. However, I will put the conclusion here: "Much new research will be required to translate emerging data on higher exposures to glyphosate and Bt toxins into estimates of human, farm and companion animal, and environmental risks." ------------------------------------------------------------------------ H.Kuska further comment: I feel that the above conclusion is consistent with my personel conclusion that scientists who are opposed to their being GMOs in our food supply generally are opposed to using the general population as beta testers ( beta testers is my term - long term safety studies are still needed is a more common statement). The main concern, as I see it, is what will happen if we are exposed to a continual diet of GMOs for an extended period. Normally included in statements like this is that each type of GMO has to be certified individually. ----------------------------------- 2013 scientific review: Title: "Food health quality of genetically modified crops ��" review of risks and benefits" "However, genetically modified organism are relatively new, as they appeared commercially in the mid 90’s and are poorly addressed by current testing methods [51]. That is why, there is a need for further discussions on risks and benefits of GM crops not only in terms of health, but also in terms of the environmental and socio-economic effects. To obtain more valuable results, the presented factors must be also evaluated in terms of their relative importance under specific conditions. For example, in poor and malnourished societies, “improved nutrition” and “food availability” may be considered a more important aspect of health sustainability than “changes in level of natural toxins” in plants, whereas in rich societies, this relation is likely to be the opposite. A major limitation of this review is the availability of the existing studies, showing results that were often conflicting and rooted in speculations. Thus, further research is needed to obtain more consistent outcome." http://mil-pharm-med.pl/2013/2-6/3.pdf Here is a link that might be useful: USA Today version of story

One of my favorites that isn't listed above: "If you can read this, I can hit my breaks and sue you." One I read above which I think bears repeating: "If you can read this, thank a teacher Because it is in English, thank a soldier" Fun fact: One of the least expensive items ever sold at a Christie's auction was a bundle of "I Grock Spock" bumper stickers that went for, like, $4.

Auntjen- someone in my neighborhood has that! I was telling my husband about it. Actually, I have plain stick figures, dad, mom, girl, boy, dog, cat. I want to put the cat in the dog's mouth. I thought that would be a good take on that stuff. Rucnmom- very funny! I saw the pulling hair one the other day and although I thought it was funny it was very awkward watching my kids reading it. Ewwww. I know this was on a shirt but I will share anyway. A girl snowboarding had a black shirt with hot pink writing. It said "Got Boobs? then get a mammogram". I approached the 20 something and told her I appreciated her at least wearing a Boob shirt that was worthwhile and not stupid like so many wear. I told her I just finished treatment and boarded away. She stood there in disbelief and smiled really big.