SHOP PRODUCTS
Houzz Logo Print
cynic_gw

The epitome of compromise I guess...

cynic
7 years ago
last modified: 7 years ago

Nearly 27 years ago in a small town in Minnesota an 11 year old boy was abducted walking home from the store with his brother and a friend and the 11 year old hasn't been seen since. (They went to rent a video.) One of the boys was abducted and the other two were instructed to run. The remains of Jacob Wetterling were found just the other day. The killer agreed to lead authorities to the remains as part of a plea bargain that was signed in court today. The agreement was to drop all but one of the 25 child porn charges and drop the murder charge. For the remaining count he can get up to a 20 year sentence (and theoretically with good behavior could be out in 17 years). Recent DNA evidence proved he sexually assaulted a 12 year old a short while before Jacob's disappearance but statute of limitations ran out on charging him for it. SOL (kind of a double meaning) had run out on charging him with abduction and assault on Jacob too.

So, why did a murder, abduction, 2 assaults and 25 porn charges get dropped to one charge? Therein lies the compromise. Had they not agreed, he could well have gone to his grave without disclosing the body's location or what happened. They had insufficient evidence to try him without a body. All the other evidence was iffy for the abduction and assaults too. The other assault victim couldn't pick him out of a photo lineup. But they wanted the case solved, the family wanted his remains back and they wanted to know what happened to him. So, in exchange for the dropped charges and an agreement on where to serve the sentence, he led them to the remains, told them what happened (assuming he's telling the truth...), admitted to the murder and to both assaults and now a lot of people are up in arms that he's getting away with murder. Technically he is but first, the family deserved to know what happened and have his remains and second, he'll probably be subject to a civil commitment at the end of his sentence assuming he lives through it. Nearly 27 years of parents, family and friends hoping Jacob was alive was crushed, but at least now they know. It's good in a way, bad in many ways, sad in all ways. I have very mixed feelings.

It's said that a "good" compromise comes out with all parties unhappy. Nobody is happy over this. So that makes it a good compromise I guess. At least the family had a lot of input on the plea bargain. They can now start grieving after nearly 27 years of agony. I can't even try to imagine what they've gone through and they're not finished yet.

Comments (30)