Tide Pur Clean
miami mami
7 years ago
Featured Answer
Sort by:Oldest
Comments (45)
Related Discussions
Tide PurClean
Comments (63)Thanks for sharing Whirlpool. I'm glad someone finally did a comparison. So they said Seventh Generation was comparable to conventional detergents...Which ones? How much worse than tide was it? The other thing I found interesting in reading reviews of Mrs. Meyer's on Amazon, many complained about it causing a funky aroma on their laundry after a period of time. That has also happened to me with green detergents. I wonder if the plant-based surfactants build up and start to decay?...See MoreI tested 10 eco-friendly detergents and this is what I found...
Comments (90)Larisa - Thanks for posting this. I think you do have to take into consideration that a company that receives an “F” has got to say something in response. Their explanation, that Borax takes up 1% of their formula and they don’t believe EWG takes that into account, is not correct. I just read that on the EWG site, that they definitely do take it into account when giving grades. Have you looked at the review of Puracy on their site? They do list Borax [sodium borate] as an ingredient with an F. It is reported to be HIGH concern, because it causes developmental/endocrine/reproductive effects. And based on their explanations of what they consider in their grading, that 1% that is in the formula still ranks enough to cause high concern. Perhaps the company is saying that due to not wanting to give away trade secrets, they do not want to reveal how much borax is in their product. But - they just did. So it doesn’t add up that they didn’t want to tell EWG how much was in the formula before the grade was given. For me that category of concern about developmental and reproductive toxicity is really on my radar, so I don’t even want to use a product with moderate concern about these effects, let alone high concern. Here is EWG’s position on Borax… https://www.ewg.org/enviroblog/2016/05/watch-out-borax#.Wl5yCa2ZNGU Look at the whole review. This product has one F ingredient, 8 ingredients that get a C, 9 ingredients that are a B and 5 ingredients that get an A. That’s a lot of ingredients. The company in their statement, said “there are ONLY 19 ingredients”. [g]. That is a lot to me. Compare that to the products that receive an "A". They also have Benzisothiazolinones which are of moderate concern for acute aquatic toxicity. They have 4 ingredients that have no data on them. They do have a good rating for ingredient disclosure, which is a good start. I’ve noticed a number of recent reviews have upgraded some of the grades on products that changed their formula to remove some ingredient that was problematic. Or provided EWG with better information. The company is claiming that there is no exposure to these chemicals. That they are completely rinsed away from clothing in the rinse cycle. I don’t think they can guarantee that. Nor does that address what happens to them when they are dumped into the waste water and the effect that eventually has on the environment. If the chemicals that are of concern are not in the product in the first place, then there is no concern. The company is saying to you - as these companies have for decades - we have done OUR OWN testing and we say the risk from this product is a 1 or a 2 on a scale of 0-4. I’m sorry, I am not going to rely on what the company that makes the product tells me is the risk. They have too much at stake to be an objective source of that kind of information. The only way to have a chance of getting objective information, is to have an independent organization like EWG. If a company disputes their findings, then they should have their scientists meet with the scientists at EWG and work it out. Instead of getting their PR department to make an attack online of EWG and what they do. In this response from the company, they criticized everything that EWG does and didn’t take into account anything they are doing right. It’s a one sided, PR effort to avoid the consequences of a bad review. I'd be interested in seeing EWG's response to it. They explain that you have to have borax in a product that has enzymes in it to stabilize it. Yet Grab Green Pods has enzymes and no Borax and many of you here are happy with that product. So, that’s not right either. That's just my take on it. I know you use the product and like it and it's not simple and clear cut to weigh everything. But, I really support having an independent organization like EWG to protect the consumer and I don't think a manufacturer should criticize what they do, in defense of their product, especially when their defense has some inaccuracies in it. EWG is not singling them out. They are very anti-Borax, no matter who is using it in their formula, including DIY recipes....See MoreTide pur clean Honey Lavender revisited :-O
Comments (43)Hi Pat! YES! Purclean is my top detergent for dark clothing! I still am using it and loving it. I recently bought the unscented one for my husbands dark office shirts and I use it with the method beach sage dryer sheets for a light clean finish....See MoreTide Pur Clean vs 7th Gen
Comments (3)I really like the Tide Pur clean for my darks. I haven’t used seventh generation in years because I was unhappy with it’s performance back then. So I can’t compare to their current formulation. Pur clean does cause more suds even in our hard water but I’ve never had a suds error....See Moremiami mami
7 years agomamapinky0
7 years agoAndrew Criswell
7 years agomiami mami
7 years agomamapinky0
7 years agoAndrew
7 years agoenduring
7 years agolittlegreeny
7 years agoAndrew Criswell
7 years agomamapinky0
7 years agolittlegreeny
7 years agogeorgect
7 years agomamapinky0
7 years agolittlegreeny
7 years agomiami mami
7 years agomiami mami
7 years agomiami mami
7 years agoJennifer Bachman
7 years agomamapinky0
7 years agolast modified: 7 years agolarsi_gw
7 years agosspeer9
7 years agoakl_vdb
7 years agoJennifer Bachman
7 years agolivebetter
7 years agosspeer9
7 years agoToni
6 years agolast modified: 6 years agoToni
6 years agolivebetter
6 years agoenduring
6 years agolast modified: 6 years agoToni
6 years agolast modified: 6 years agomamapinky0
6 years agoHappyday
6 years agolast modified: 6 years agoarkansas girl
6 years agolarsi_gw
6 years agoPat Z5or6 SEMich
6 years agodoreycrouse
6 years ago
Related Stories
HOUZZ TOURSHouzz Tour: Battling the Tides Results in a Wondrous House on the Water
A complex construction effort pays off big-time with unobstructed views of Blue Hill Bay in Maine
Full StoryHOUSEKEEPINGChoose Your Own Spring Cleaning Plan
Instead of trying to do it all, pick one of these six cleaning approaches that’s right for you now
Full StoryKITCHEN DESIGNSpring Clean Your Kitchen
Scour our 15 ways to ditch the dirt and get rid of the gunk, leaving your kitchen spick and span in time for spring
Full StoryHOUSEKEEPINGHow to Clean and Care for Your Mattress
See what the experts recommend to protect your mattress from dust, moisture and stains
Full StoryHOUZZ TOURSHouzz Tour: Beachy Casualness in Landlocked Minneapolis
Neutrals, natural materials and winks to nautical imagery help this home ride a tide of laid-back style
Full StoryLIFEHouzz Call: What Has Mom Taught You About Making a Home?
Whether your mother taught you to cook and clean or how to order takeout and let messes be, we'd like to hear about it
Full StoryPETSSo You Want to Get a Cat
If you're a cat lover, the joys outweigh any other issue. If you haven't lived with one yet, here are a few things to know
Full StoryKITCHEN DESIGNCottage Kitchen’s Refresh Is a ‘Remodel Lite’
By keeping what worked just fine and spending where it counted, a couple saves enough money to remodel a bathroom
Full StoryMOST POPULARHomeowners Give the Pink Sink Some Love
When it comes to pastel sinks in a vintage bath, some people love ’em and leave ’em. Would you?
Full StoryFUN HOUZZHow to Survive an Epidemic of Walking Dead
Tips to use around the house and garden to prep for the zombie apocalypse
Full Story
Andrew Criswell