SPOILERS

I read this book for the first time (I finished it a couple of weeks ago), and found it strange, and strangely compelling. I know nothing about Bowles, so it is interesting to know that there is a biographical element to it. Yet how odd that the author's representative character is killed off part way through the novel!

To me, until Port dies, the novel seemed primarily about him, and his often-misguided desire to connect with the universe, with love, with meaning. I loved the passage about the sheltering sky; the author really evoked a feeling of barely-concealed chaos and nothingness beyond the surface of things.

I did feel that the book was existential, with the three protagonists casting about in search of meaning and experience--painful or otherwise--who are oddly removed from their own feelings. In the exotic and dangerous setting of North Africa, they seem strangely apathetic and out of touch with the things around them. I loved the descriptions of the cities, the trains, the heat and the light--and the sky. The novel seemed suffused with a sense of menace and danger.

Once Port died, and Kit "escaped"--the novel took on a completely different feel--Kit seemed to shift from being a languid, selfish, and slightly bored young woman, to one who completely loses herself and her identity. From start to finish, her entire persona seemed apathetic, without real volition, but after Port's death it seems that she drifts to the other side of that "sheltering sky," or so it seemed to me, a nightmarish and unreal series of dreadful situations.

I really enjoyed this novel. It is strange, disturbing, and haunting. I will have to read it again; I know I missed so much!

Spoilers.

Kkay, thanks for your comments! I think the book is well worth reading again, as I have done. For more background on Paul Bowles and his expatriate life, you might want to look for "The Dream at the End of the World" by Michelle Green.

The change in the personality of Kit toward the ending really shocked me, even upon re-reading. But however bad the events, they seemed to have made her feel more alive. When she was captured by the men in the desert, I thought of the "Stockholm Syndrome", where the victim tries to identify with her captors.

Thank you, Woodnymph, I will look for that book by Michelle Green. I would like to know more about Paul Bowles.

Yes, the entire portion of the book about Kit on the lam seemed so shocking to me--up to that point she seemed fastidious and self-absorbed, and then when she "escapes" she seems willing to submit to any sort of treatment and situation. If was fascinating. And yes--she did seem more alive, if only in her senses. She was utterly not a thinking woman; in a strange way she made me think of a queen bee, held in that box, only there to serve to give pleasure. Really a remarkable story.

Bringing this thread up so others can join in our discussion, hopefully....

I read this book too long ago to make meaningful comments. However, I wanted to share a tidbit I ran across in an article I read when the movie came out back in 1990. I loved the movie and read the book as a follow up. In the article, the director said that he had changed the character of the Tuareg to peaceful in his movie from the author's portrayal of these people as dangerous. He did so based on a modern understanding of their culture, and Bowles himself said it was a good change.

Hmm, I'm rambling. I'm back from a long trip (partly to visit Rouan) and my brain is still a bit jet lagged.

I read this book and also found it strangely compelling. I had a hard time understanding Kit's behavior towards the end and had to go back and let it the book "simmer" for a while so I could look at it more objectively.
A couple parts of the book really stood out for me. The first one was the way Kit described her relationship with Port and how they both wanted to reconnect but were both hindered by their natures. How she was paralyzed by her fear and how he had shut himself in a cage to save himself from love. (I believe it was something like that) I thought that really gave a lot of insight into their behavior.
This fear that ruled Kit helped me understand a bit more how she acted in the last part of the book after Port's death. How her entire life she was ruled by omens, always dreading some inescapable, awful event. I believe that when Port died, that was the terrible event she was waiting for. When he died, it broke that nature in her or removed it, and took with it the very essence of her rationale so that in the end she was acting completely on insticts without reason and was turned into something much more wild and animal-like.

The other part I really liked was how Port described his death..."A black star appears, a point of darkness in the night sky's clarity. Point of darkness and gateway to repose. Reach out and pierce the fine fabric of the sheltering sky, take repose."
I liked that especially because of how he first described the sheltering sky as protecting them from the chaos behind, when in the end it was where he found his peace.

How interesting, rose, that the author was glad about the revisionist approach to his portrayal of the Bedouin in the novel. I thought the menacing and (to me) inexplicable behavior of the men who "kidnap" Kit suited the trajectory of the story. And certainly Kit did not object to their treatment of her. It would have been a different novel if instead of sexually exploiting her, they had endeavored to send her back to "her people." How did the movie compare? I may have to see that, too.

Hazel, I agree about letting the book "simmer"--it has a strong flavor, and its imagery was overwhelming to me at times.

Kit did seem much more like an elemental creature after Port died; she appeared to be freed of her fearfulness and embraced the unknown (and how!). It was a pity that she couldn't overcome her fear and embrace Port while she could have.

We haven't said much about Tunner. I thought it was interesting that he was so repelled by the desert that he took off, and remained outside the entire drama of Port's death and Kit's descent. He seemed oblivious to so much that was around him.

I'm still thinking about the character of Kit. I suppose the best way to sum her up is dwelling in fear and superstition, in the looking constantly for "omens." I suppose she might be compared to someone today who frequently reads their daily horoscope, reads the Runes or the Tarot Cards, and looks for symbolism or synchronicity at every turning....

It seems strange that in Port's death, Kit found life. In her descent into madness, she seemed to come alive and to find a new "self," hitherto unexplored, unexamined.

Just finished the book a couple of days ago, and have been letting it "simmer" (as Hazel so accurately describes it). I found it to be a tough story to get into initially, but once I got sucked in, I really enjoyed it. It reminded me in many ways of Hemingway and how he writes for some reason.

I agree that Port and Kit were both revolving in their own worlds for their own reasons - it's such a shame that Port missed her change to a woman based on feelings/senses rather than rational thought. I think he would have liked that side of her more than the side she presented up until he died.

The descriptions of the desert, the color and vast size of the sky, the peoples who live there - all wonderfully done. I could feel the dust, the dryness, the sandy grains.... You could tell that Bowles had lived there and experienced some of this - they were wonderful descriptions of a hostile place in some ways.

Interesting that his wife has been compared to Zelda Fitzgerald, as I also found the book to be similar to "The Great Gatsby" - disaffected aimless rich/well off young adults adrift in a world they know little about and just floating from one place/situation to another without planning anything much.

I would not have read this in a million years if we hadn't mentioned it on RP, so thanks for doing it. I enjoyed it, although I am not sure I would read another one of his.

Do you think that Kit, in the third part of the book when she changes so much -- is she reveling in the freedom she feels or is she retreating from having lost her bearings/lover etc? I mean, is her changing from being a very rational person to a person who uses her senses a positive change or a negative one? She seems as though she is sleepwalking in some situations - the sexual violence from the camel traders etc...

lemonhead, good commentary. I agree that Kit seems to be sleepwalking during the sexual scenes at the end with the camel traders. But I don't know how one could say she changes from being a rational person to an emotional one. (I don't consider dependence on "omens" to be a rational way of conducting one's life). I suppose one could make an argument on the other side, that Kit was sleep-walking during her marriage to Port, and then was jolted awake (into a nightmare) with the violence she experienced from the camel traders, which represented a clash of cultures.

I saw the novel as a fascinating study of descent into madness, among other themes.