someone wants to buy my house cash/we still have mortgage

12 years ago

We are in the process of trying to sell our home privately. We are asking for $400,000, and we still owe on the mortgage around $350,000. A family who seemed pretty serious about buying our house came to us with a proposition; they would like to pay half of what we are asking in cash, I don't believe they qualify for a loan but the have cash to pay. they then said they would have us get a lawyer to create an escrow account so that they could pay off the remainder of our loan and then become owners of the house.

I apologize if this sounds at all crazy or unclear, and would be glad to explain anything more that may clarify my issue.

we have another potential buyer and dont want to hold things up.

Does this sound like a scam or can people really buy houses partially in cash and pay off the remaining mortgage???

Sort by:Oldest

Comments (16)

terezosa / terriks
12 years ago
You probably have a "due on sale" clause with your mortgage, meaning if you transfer title or give up any ownership of the house the balance of your mortgage will be immediately due and payable.

What they are suggesting is a land sale contract. Normally you will continue to "own" the home until the contract is completely paid off,but I believe that your mortgage company can invoke the due on sale clause. Tread carefully.
azzalea
12 years ago
Also, think about this--while the downpayment may seem very appealing to you, in the longrun, you're taking all the risk, they're taking none. Without knowing all the legalities, and terms--common sense tells you that YOU'RE name is still going to be on the mortgage, YOU will be liable for the monthy payments. If they find they cannot make them, YOU will be stuck for the money--and don't forget, it can be very, very difficult to get someone out of a property you own, even when they're not paying. Dsis had a tennant in a rental property she owned, who stopped paying rent--it took them over a year to budge her, cost them a bit in legal fees, and they never did get the back rent from her. Oh, and in the meantime, she virtually ruined the place--they had to replace all the appliances, a lot of the plumbing, floors, repaint, etc.

Look, ANYONE who can come up with half the selling price in cash for a downpayment can certainly qualify for a mortgage for the rest--unless there's something terribly, terribly wrong, or this is a scam to 'steal' your house from you for half price.

Myself? I wouldn't hold a mortgage (or let someone else live on mine) for anyone. If you decide to do this be very very careful--get a credit report on them. Investigate WHY they 'cannot' get a mortgage, even though they have so much ready cash, find out about their housing background--where have they lived? have there been problems? and do make sure YOUR lawyer is satisfied that whatever contract you come up with will adequately protect you.
Related Discussions
My DH wants this house: someone talk sense into him!
Q
Comments (62)
jkom, You seem the to be the only one with an understanding of the structural bracing necessary in an earthquake territory. The earthquake issue poses very real and expensive challenges in updating old houses. Do folks in other parts of the country not worry about crumbly concrete? I have only lived in the Pacific NW. It is actually quite common to see old houses lifted up on jacks and have the foundation re-poured and the house set on a new foundation. Our GC told us that it costs 50K-100K to do that. Since that is quite commonly done, my DH's proposal is to rotate the house at the same time if physically possible! In a $1mil house, it is a doable proposition. We live in a remodeled 1950s house right now. We took off all old lap-sheathing under the old siding, placed structural plywood sheathing with bracing everywhere. We had to get engineer's sign off prior to starting the project... We bolted framing to the foundation in the basement before finishing the basement. Our current house has been 'earthquake retrofitted'. It cost A LOT of money without really increasing the value of the house. When you go to sell the house, most people (young buyers or people from elsewhere in the country) don't realize what it takes to do that. We have friends in the SF bay area, CA that bought a house with the idea of total remodel. When they started to rip out things, they discovered that the foundation was damaged beyond repair and the previous owners covered it up to sell it. They actually demolished the house, then rebuilt on the lot. They sued the original owners... Our friends ultimately won the case. I think our friends with really deep pockets may have ended up paying more money in legal fees than what they got out of the settlement because they were MAD about the fraud. These things happen, buying things that are beyond what one had anticipated. I am putting a big padding number to not be surprised, hence my $500K to $750K number to update structurally to not have a total loss.... Anyhow, old houses with structural issues in an earthquake territory is a sad thing. There was an amazing old house on a steep hill in my neighborhood with really a stunning view. WAY WAY better than the one we are considering. The house was used as the Italian Consulate in its heyday. It even had a ballroom. Due to structural issues, the person who bought the house ended up donating the property to the city and the house was demolished, and the lot subsequently became a park. I think the tax break they got from the donation was easier to swallow than what it could have cost to restore. One of the due diligence we need to do is to see if we can get a reasonable earthquake insurance on this property. Many old houses in Seattle cannot get ANY earthquake insurance unless you do the extensive earthquake retrofit. For those folks not familiar with earthquake premiums, you buy separate earthquake policies in addition to the regular home owners insurance. The premium is usually equal to the regular home owners insurance. The deductible is generally 20K or more on an earthquake insurance. We have multiple rentals and we carry earthquake insurance on all of them. It costs several thousand $s every year for that! After what happened in Japan and Katrina, we are unsure if the earthquake insurance will actually be helpful if the city was a TOTAL disaster to the point where bridges fell down, tall buildings tumbled. But alas, we play by the rule and hope that the insurance companies also play by the rule.
...See More
Dave! Mortgage vs. cash
Q
Comments (12)
marys1000 - It sucks renting and it would be hard to find those things you want. Also since you don't know how long you'll be staying it might be hard to sell what you want in the future. One other option you have would be to buy a house, not your ideal house, but one that would be a compromise. For example something like the below. I'm sure people that get transferred often has some good suggestions too. 1. Buy something in an area that will always be popular so it will be easier to sell when you are ready to move. (good school district etc.) 2. Something that will allow you to put the vegetable garden and bird feeders, but would appeal the a majority of the people if it was just lawn and regular plantings if you needed to sell. 3. A reasonable price range where the majority of the buyers would be in the area you are looking for an easier sale later. One that also would allow you to save money and this could include your commute if you drive due to gas prices. This way you can have some of your most important things, but you may have to live with neighbors closer than you'd like for a while and a few other things, but still have what you can't with a rental and also enjoy it some with the gardening even though it wouldn't be your full wish list. BTW when it comes to closing costs it depends on who the lender is how much you'd have to pay for the loan. For example we used a local bank to buy the lot next to us and we only paid the same closing costs as a cash buyer except for an extra $100. If you have to pay a loan origination fee then it could add up. A bank should be able to tell you what their fees are for a closing, however they can't tell you the full closing costs due to things like title insurance etc. Only things related to the loan. I think it makes sense to invest your cash and use the bank to assume the risk. This way if you need the cash you have it available and if you have to sell for less than you owe and have to bring cash to closing at least you made money off your own cash until that point. Even though you will pay mostly interest to start it isn't much different than throwing the money away on rent except you have a tax deduction and you get to put the bird feeders and the vegetable garden you want.
...See More
Pay cash and get mortgage?
Q
Comments (10)
Hello, Bellamy. Here are the reasons: 1. At the price point I'm looking at, there will be some substantial repairs needed. The longer those are delayed, the more damage will occur and the more they will cost, so they should be done right away. Leaky plumbing is different from an ugly kitchen as far as how soon it must be dealt with. A nicer kitchen can easily wait till I get everything paid off. Structural stuff can't. 2. I'm not considering the mortgage deduction at all in deciding whether or not to do it this way, although I would prefer to do the loan as a mortgage so that it's deductible. If I'm paying some interest, why not have it be at least partially deductible, if it can be? I know what you're saying, though. My mother had a friend who was fairly well off and her accountant kept urging her to pay off her older mortgage, which was at a higher interest rate. She wouldn't, because she wanted the deduction, since it was the only big deduction she had. That was silly. 3. Yes, I could pay cash for the house and for the repairs, but it would put me in a position where I would feel very uncomfortable if I had a catastrophic medical situation, for example, and the total cost of the mortgage over its lifetime at the current interest rate would be approximately $4K, plus whatever fees. While it would be nicer not to have to put out that kind of money, to me it would be worth it to know that I could do this and still be set for emergencies and not making a huge dent in my retirement savings (I'm self-employed). I can live hand to mouth and have done that, but it's much pleasanter not to. I totally hate debt, but I've looked at this from a number of different angles and in the long run I think that buying will be cheaper than continuing to pay rent, since I live in a winter resort area and the only places where rents are going down proportionately to the drop in sale prices are those where the owners are in pre-foreclosure and desperate for any income. I don't want to get into that kind of situation. If my income level continues to be what it is now, I should be able to pay off the loan in four or five years at the most, and at worst I could scrape by on minimum wage and still make the basic payment as well as HOA, taxes, insurance. If I could pay cash for everything, if I stayed 6 or 7 years I could give the place away at to charity at the end of that time and really not be out more than I would if I continued to rent the same amount of time. The mortgage interest means I would need another year or so to get to the same place.
...See More
What should be my financial goal to have a nice home built for cash?
Q
Comments (44)
OP - I really think you need to sit down and rethink your position. You have a lot of ideas swirling around, but they're not well defined or mutually consistent. First, you need to define much more concretely what kind of house you really want - you say simple, unpretentious, but then mention 10 foot ceilings in the basement, multiple living/family rooms and perhaps even a cupola. You don't need separate rooms for every function, which is what your wish list kind of comes across as: you might want to consider re-doing your "needs" and "wants" not in terms of rooms required but in terms of the functions you want your house as a whole to perform. Rooms that can do double duty would save you square footage and money. Second, as I mentioned previously, you need to get a handle on housing costs where you live. That may mean going to open houses, surfing Zillow, talking to local agents or having a sit down with a contractor or architect. Third, I think you should put aside the idea of paying for the house in cash. While I'm all in favor of getting rid of that mortgage asap for many of the reasons outlined by Mrs Pete (you cannot put a dollar value on the feeling of security you get if you grew up in a less than secure housing environment, but finally pay off your own home), nonetheless it makes a lot of sense to have a low-interest mortgage and put your cash into higher-return investments, especially if you're more or less "starting out." Fourth, you need to think about your personal financials, particularly once you have a better idea of what your housing costs are likely to be. When I bought my first house, I took out a mortgage that was about half of what the bank approved, because I knew I could pay that amount without having to chip into my contingency fund (at the time, 3 months salary) and while still contributing to my retirement fund and my regular investment fund. So, I bought a smaller, simpler place than my bank would have allowed, simply because it suited my long term financial goals better. I'm much older now, have built up a decent portfolio, as has my better half, so we did pay cash outright for our last house - but again, we built a house that was less than we could afford, but allowed us to leave savings and retirement funds intact (we did have to sell one investment property as well as our old home to make it happen, but that was no great sacrifice!) People talk a lot about dream houses, but sometimes a dream house isn't all marble floors and a backyard swimming pool or 5000 sq feet of space. Sometimes it's living comfortably and affordably in a good area, and enjoying a retirement that allows you to enjoy life, restaurants, travel, and friends. The dream life is more important to me than the dream house.
...See More
etr2002
12 years ago
One word came to mind after I read your post.....RUN!

The other posters gave you great things to think about, and honestly you need to trust your gut. The fact that you are already doubting is a huge flag that you already know what you need to do....RUN.
graywings123
12 years ago
Certainly get your own legal advice on this, but don't refuse this deal simply because it is out of the ordinary. If people always ran away from the unknown, where would the world be?

Mortgage rates are low these days, but getting a mortgage is really hard if the buyer doesn't fit the profile of what the mortgage companies want.
azzalea
12 years ago
Dh added something--people with a lot of ready cash, but no credit histories are often those dealing with illegal stuff like drugs. IF your house is turned into a meth lab, for example, you could lose it completely (the government often seizes those)--you'll be out the house and will still owe the remainder of the mortgage if that were to happen. I'd wonder if you'd end up with other legal issues if drugs were being shopped on your property?
jane__ny
12 years ago
There are many people (look at all the foreclosures and short sales) who cannot get a mortgage and want to buy a house. They have income and this might be the only way they can buy a house. I don't see anything unusual, however I don't think I would hold a mortgage for anyone.

They could be sincere but too many things could go wrong.

Jane
brickeyee
12 years ago
Lenders are very attentive to the 'games' that have been used previously to avoid 'due on sale' clauses.

Unless you have the ability to pay of the entire mortgage balance on demand (often 30 days) tread very carefully.
User
12 years ago
And don't forget that any cash transaction over 10K has to be reported to the government. So, when you deposit that cash, YOU come under scrutiny. They can use a fake name, a shill, or relative, and it won't show up because they aren't giving that cash to an institution, just an individual. That's another headache you probably don't need.
Billl
12 years ago
If you are considering this, you obviously need to consult a real estate lawyer.

One thing to remember - if major lenders think it is too risky to lend to this person, are you comfortable risking your financial future on them?
brickeyee
12 years ago
"if major lenders think it is too risky to lend to this person, are you comfortable risking your financial future on them?"

Can you afford the financial impact of having to foreclose and take back the property?

And correct any damage that has been done.
ncrealestateguy
12 years ago
Most RE attorneys will not facilitate a "Subject To" closing, because they feel like they are helping to facilitate a civil crime. The current mortgage has a Due On Sale Clause which means that if the deed is transferred, the current mortgage must be paid in full. This clause was added in the 80's when interest rates skyrocketed and people found it beneficial to take a note subject to, at the current interest rate, as opposed to getting a new loan at the current, high interest rate.
I know an investor that does Subject To deals all the time, and the lenders have never called the note due. But there is always that chance. He only is in posession of the home for a very short time, as he immediately rehabs and sells them. Unlike you would be.
Another thing to think about... what is going to happen when you go to buy your next home and the lender finds that you have another mortgage? You will probably not qualify. And if you do, it might be considered a second home, which raises other issues.
I personally would not do it... too much risk.
If you do go through with it, set up a banking account in your name where the drsfts for the mortgage payments will be coming from, so the bank does not see the change. You will also have to figure out how to fool the banks as far as the insurance policy changing names, but the house was never sold. This is a major way that the bank will know that the home has changed hands. As you can see, even if no one has ever been prosecuted for doing this kind of thing, it is shady at best.
eggshellfinish
12 years ago
What I'd like to know is...
Why are you already selling a house of which you only own a quarter? It's never seemed smart to me to sell a house until it's paid off in full. (But I'm a bit of a Luddite that way.)
brickeyee
12 years ago
"It's never seemed smart to me to sell a house until it's paid off in full."

Are you for real?

Why would you stay in a house that no longer meets your needs (or wants for that matter) just so you can pay it off?

If you sell for more than the mortgage balance you use part of the proceeds to pay of the remaining mortgage, then purchase put the rest towards another house or whatever else you want.
ncrealestateguy
12 years ago
After the closing, the home IS paid in full.
loves2read
11 years ago
I too can think of why someone with that much cash might not be able to get a mortgage

but I would not want the complication such a sale would entail--
think about how you would carry insurance on that house--
or how they would

that is likely fraught with all kinds of snares and ways to lose coverage...
brickeyee
11 years ago
I have purchased any number of houses using a mortgage despite having assets that could easily purchase the place outright.

Having all your eggs in one basket is not a sane finical position.

someone wants to buy my house cash/we still have mortgage

Comments (16)

terezosa / terriks

azzalea

Related Discussions

etr2002

graywings123

azzalea

jane__ny

brickeyee

User

Billl

brickeyee

ncrealestateguy

eggshellfinish

brickeyee

ncrealestateguy

loves2read

brickeyee

COMPANY

BUSINESS SERVICES

GET HELP

CONNECT WITH US