Two Tales of Unclaimed Funds

17 years ago

I was reading another thread which mentioned unclaimed funds, and I would like to encourage everyone to be sure to check your state's site every now and then. You never know what you might find.

A few weeks ago another site I visit mentioned this. I went to our state's site and started typing in family members' names. My mom is remarried, and I entered both of her married names. Unbelievably, I found an entry under her name when she was married to my dad and the address we lived at when I was a little girl about 45 years ago. The amount was almost $700. The story doesn't stop there though. The unclaimed funds were from Prudential insurance's demutualization which happened about five years ago. I thought if she was due money under that name and address, she must have an insurance policy under that name and address as well. We called Prudential to inquire, and YES she does! She couldn't believe it! I think she might have not paid premiums and thought the policy was gone. It is actually still active and has cash value. She didn't even remember it. She is now in the process of updating her information with them and making a claim for those unclaimed funds. This is amazing to us since she is 80 now, and if she were to have died, we would never have known about this policy!

This experience reminded me how we all need to keep track of stuff like this. I used to work as an auditor in the corporate headquarters of a large bank in Cleveland. One of my duties was to go through printouts of old accounts and send out letters to the last known address of the customers advising them of their dormant account balances. If not claimed or a transaction done on the account in a specific time frame, the money went to the state. My most memorable one was an 80+ year old woman who had $82,000 in a checking account that didn't even earn interest! She never claimed it, and it went to the state with all the other unclaimed funds.

Sort by:Oldest

Comments (9)

marie26
17 years ago
Deeann, how long does an account have to be dormant until the state can take the money?
marge727
17 years ago
That varies from state to state. In each state if you go on their web site, its likely they will tell you. I think with the 45 year old claim that would have escheated to the state in most places. California just moved up their escheat time to 3 years which launched lots of unhappy claims. It seems they decided they also didn't need to notify as well as they used to. More money for the state I guess.
Altho in one lawsuit I saw, they couldn't find some well known movie star, so I guess they don't look very hard.
Related Discussions
The Addicts Tale
Q
Comments (8)
Thank you everyone. I am happy to be a part of this enabler (not recovery!) group. As you can see, I owe my addiction to several enablers who stepped in at critical moments and gave me freebies until my addiction was confirmed! I have done this to other people as well. One of my relatives went to Hawaii after I had given her a plumeria and she returned without buying another one. She told me she had experienced overwhelming urges to buy plumeria cuttings and plants, the power of which amazed her. So I gave her a second plumeria shortly after she returned home! I predict we will all be bidding against her next spring.
...See More
A Tale of Two Widows
Q
Comments (35)
Hi again alisande/Susan (and others), You sound fairly shrewd to me, as well, lady. I was hoping that you'd not chicken out, but choose to stay fairly heavily equity-invested ... even as you approach possible soon-to-develop, plus possibly increasing physical decrepitude, and possibly, similar experience mentally. It seems to me that carrying a percentage equal to 100 minus one's age in equities may be fine for a few very risk-averse (and rich) persons, especially ones really worried about short-term risk, but not thinking much about the long-term risk in settling for an investment system where the principal can't grow, so the only earnings relative to this year are made now ... and taxed now (and at top rate, in Canada). Possibly I didn't make it clear enough in my earlier message when I stated that, nearing age 80, I'm running about 80% of assets in individual stocks and equity-based mutual funds, that I live on substantially below my current pension income, apart from investment income, so, lacking major health catastrophe, do not plan to need to cash any equities under pressure in the near future. And then, markets being heavily down, I might choose to use my Letter of Credit for living expenses, rather than cashing stocks ... if, as recovery starts, they may well increase 25% or so in the first year (or even two), and most likely above average rates of growth for another year or two, I'd be happy to pay last year's 6.25% interest rate, and even more so at current 4.75% rate, even if non-deductible, as loan was for consumption. I do think that this drop may be deeper, and more prolonged, plus subsequent recovery slower, than in earlier cycles. As my age increases, the possibility of the major need in the short term increases ... but I have an added advantage that much/most of my health care in Canada is not a direct charge on me. That bank stock that I referred to earlier (check it at Yahoo-> Finance "CM.TO" if you wish) ran in the 60's much of the time since mid-year, sometimes in the high 50s, as it was at close on Fri, Oct. 3 ... then at close Oct. 10 was 49.10 ... and back up Oct. 17 to CD$58.00. I've wondered recently about selling and re-buying (but it'd be another bank who's made fewer unwise investments in recent years - these guys were hit some by the ENRON debacle, as well). But the share prices of the other banks, including the one that I prefer, didn't deteriorate nearly as far. I wouldn't want to do it this year, as I bought shares in Canada's premier phone co. a couple of years ago (that has various other interests as well) and there was an offer to buy them out at $42.75 last year, to close early this year. But, with the financial problems, it was delayed (the banks would have had to pay a huge penalty if they backed out, prior to a certain date). But no dividend payments through most of this year. As a major funder was to be the Royal Bank of Scotland, that now is being heavily supported by the British gov't., there's a substantial feeling that the original price won't be met, so current price offered has been dropping. At the original price, I'd have had a substantial capital gain, so wouldn't have wanted another, in this year. If the phone co. deal is delayed again past the New Year, I might well sell some of the bank, this year, to develop that capital gain (at my current marginal tax rate, rather than the 45 - 50% or so rate that will likely apply on some of the assets if I let them ride till my death, with all being deemed "sold", and capital gain developed, all at once, then). There's also some feeling that the phone deal will die: which would please some of us, for we disliked seeing this strong, stable, dividend-paying ("widows and orphans") stock being essentially privatized - major in-country (required) party to the buyout being a major Canadian pension fund. Good wishes for increasingly shrewd management of your income and assets. ole joyful
...See More
It Took Awhile, But My Unclaimed Property Check...
Q
Comments (7)
Sounds like a few people here had Good News by searching Unclaimed Property websites! Mine was only for $140.15, but still. And, yes, it is a total mystery why this popped up at this very late date. Makes me wonder how this was handled in pre-internet days, though I do seem to recall seeing a very long list of such items published in a local newspaper maybe 20 years ago. Maybe that was required that at least California did this periodically. Or maybe the State just kept it. BTW, speaking of such lists in newspapers, when I was going through my local archived/microfilmed newspapers recently from around 1910 or so, they used to publish a long list of undeliverable U.S. Mail for my city's residents from time to time. "Come & Get It" I guess. I found that system amusing.
...See More
Unclaimed Funds
Q
Comments (43)
Coming back a couple months later to say thank you to @Tina Marie DH's unclaimed property check arrived yesterday. State of MD does not provide any info in advance how much the funds are, but dh figured it wasn't much - an old insurance reimbursement from a car accident where someone sideswiped him while parallel parking. Only took dh five minutes to fill out the paperwork back in December. His check for just under $400 arrived yesterday. Not much but better than the State of MD getting to keep it!
...See More
minet
17 years ago
Not just unclaimed funds get lost in the shuffle -

A few years ago I found a check that I'd never cashed and was about to expire. It was for about $2600 and was related to our house - we refinanced and got back money from FHA. It would expire a year from the date on it - and I had just a couple of weeks left.

I would have kicked myself for several months (and never confessed to DH) if I hadn't found that check ... buried in mounds of miscellaneous paper.

And a few days ago I was sorting through medical bills, trying to match them up with insurance claims (I was ill for several months last year and it was all too overwhelming) to see what I still owed ... and found a check for over $400 from the insurance company, dated last August. It didn't have an expiration date so I stuck it in our bank account and hope it will clear. I know some of them are only good for 6 months.

So that would have been a total of over $3000 lost due to my chronic paper mismanagement ... fortunately I found them.
quiltglo
17 years ago
I was messing around one day and found my SIL on the list for her state. She was due a refund from a physician. It was less than $100, but better to be in her pocket.

Gloria
macbirch
17 years ago
Chronic paper mismanagement is one of our problems. DH keeps paid phone bills from a decade ago cluttering up the filing cabinet and often forgets to send off forms for rebates and freebies (eg, our recent purchase of a new vac entitles us to a dustbuster). Why did I decide to let him manage the house? Is it the age difference? Is it because I'm a SAHM (I hope that stands for what I think it stands for) and he's a director of something-or-other? I used to work in an office and I was good at organising things. Why did I let him be in charge at home? I don't care that he's older than me, has more qualifications than me, has a more important job than I ever had. It ain't working! One more thing to try to find the energy to fix.
meldy_nva
17 years ago
macbirch- please remember that directors have secretaries and/or administrative assistants. Guess who purges the old paper from the office files? Guess who sends out the meeting notices (similar thrill to sending for rebates)? In all my years of working with superintendents, principals and secretaries, directors, coordinators, and various administrative staff -- I've found that less than one out of a hundred director-level bodies will even *think* about proper "paper management", much less actually do something about it. If your DS is directing his office, why shouldn't you hold a similar, but more effective position for the home? You may not be managing a multi-million dollar budget, but you will be managing *your* budget and that's far more important. Just don't brag to him about your neat file drawers, that's considered poor personnel management.
oofasis
16 years ago
A few years back my husband did a search on the site, just for the heck of it -- and collected $1800 from a former employer he'd left about 25 years previously! This was in NY where the State can never take the funds.
teacats
16 years ago
An excellent discussion point above -- many years ago -- as computers invaded offices -- companies dropped the "secretaries" or "office personnel". And guess what? LOTS of companies failed --- and disappeared ...... and the real reason was NOT their product ......

((boy!! could I tell you stories about dinner parties here where folks tell the "horror" stories about why the companies they had worked for failed ...... accounts go unpaid for months, mail and basic paperwork lost ...... etc. .......))

And I wrote about this in my business stories ..... where companies had to go back and LOOK at their processes ......

Why?? Because "organization" and "time management" and inventory control" was truly looked down on in the business world (and the real world at home too!) BUT the basic truth ---- and its one that folks are still learning everyday -- is that those skills are VITAL to running ANY business -- and running ANY home.

Rant over ...... LOL!! :)
liz_h
16 years ago
How bizarre. I just checked my name on my state site and found something from 1992. It didn't show up when I entered my name and city because the only data entered in the address field was the name of my former employer. It did show up when I entered just my name.

Two Tales of Unclaimed Funds

Comments (9)

marie26

marge727

Related Discussions

minet

quiltglo

macbirch

meldy_nva

oofasis

teacats

liz_h

COMPANY

BUSINESS SERVICES

GET HELP

CONNECT WITH US