I presented the abstracts. To check on the accuracy of the statements in the review I feel that they should be compared against the full paper as without the full paper there is the danger that a given quote is misinterpreted because it is not placed in the context of the whole. Yes, it is possible that in any review that the condensation of the full paper into a paragraph leads to misleading statements. Fortunately giving the actual reference allows the other scientists to determine the actual findings presented in that reference. Back to putting quoted statements in the full context of the paper. The introduction Section is valuable to the reader so that one has an idea of what the review intends to accomplish. In this case I feel that it is too long to reproduce here. The Conclusion Section of the review is very valuable for sumarizing the full context. The review's Conclusion section is given below: "14. Conclusion This paper presents an exhaustive review of the toxic effects of the herbicide, glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup®, in humans, and demonstrates how glyphosate’s adverse effects on the gut microbiota, in conjunction with its established ability to inhibit the activity of cytochrome P450 enzymes, and its likely impairment of sulfate transport, can remarkably explain a great number of the diseases and conditions that are prevalent in the modern industrialized world. Its effects are insidious, because the long-term effects are often not immediately apparent. The pathologies to which glyphosate could plausibly contribute, through its known biosemiotic effects, include inflammatory bowel disease, obesity, depression, ADHD, autism, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, ALS, multiple sclerosis, cancer, cachexia, infertility, and developmental malformations. Glyphosate works synergistically with other factors, such as insufficient sun exposure, dietary deficiencies in critical nutrients such as sulfur and zinc, and synergistic exposure to other xenobiotics whose detoxification is impaired by glyphosate. Given the known toxic effects of glyphosate reviewed here and the plausibility that they are negatively impacting health worldwide, it is imperative for more independent research to take place to validate the ideas presented here, and to take immediate action, if they are verified, to drastically curtail the use of glyphosate in agriculture. Glyphosate is likely to be pervasive in our food supply, and, contrary to being essentially nontoxic, it may in fact be the most biologically disruptive chemical in our environment." Please notice that "remarkably explain" is not the same as "prove". (See the earlier discussion of the purpose of a Review.) "likely impairment" "glyphosate could plausibly contribute" "it is imperative for more independent research to take place to validate the ideas presented here," I will repeat the last one (I would like to put it in caps, but that is not considered polite): "it is imperative for more independent research to take place to validate the ideas presented here,"

Hi folks, Just wanted to stop by and assure you that we are working on these issues. Last week, we launched a new registration tool and there are still some bugs that are being ironed out. I know that it's frustrating and upsetting when things don't work as they should -- I really do feel your pain. Unfortunately, some of these bugs are difficult to recreate because they vary from member to member. What would be enormously helpful would be for you to contact us directly and detail what your issues are. Including information such as a step-by-step overview of your login process, where you are seeing issues, the error messages you are getting and anything else that might have differed from any previous login experiences. Many of you have probably already done this, but please make sure you check your browser settings and make sure that you have cookies enabled. If you would send this information to our contact link below, that would be extremely helpful. If you have specific questions or need something else, you are welcome to email us at the link below or contact me directly at any time -- my email is listed on my profile page. Thank you for your continued patience and support. Best regards, Tamara Amey GardenWeb Community Manager Here is a link that might be useful: Email Us

honestly if you don't wish to switch from IE to another browser then you are simply asking for punishment. IE was not made for users, but advertisers. That is why IE users have more problems with ads than users of any other browser. If you won't help yourself why on earth do you expect anyone else to help you? Download Firefox and it will automatically import all your IE links and settings to make things painless. Complaining about how bad IE sucks on ad based web sites is like sticking your hand into a fire and complaining to god about making fire less hot. Ain't gonna happen. Help yourself or learn to accept the pain.

for those that do not know how to do compatibility view Why are some webpages blank or incorrectly displayed in Internet Explorer? select compatibility mode for directions. for firefox users that are using adblock plus and easylist (update your list) if you are still having problems you can also use one of the add ons that block scripts like no script or Yesscript, they can help you to easily block certain javascript. NoScript 2.3.5 YesScript 1.9 another option is JavaScript Options 1.2.6 and while you are blocking if you want to go all out and block flash too then this one will do that Flashblock 1.5.15.1