More information has come out about the problematic juror, his personality, behavior during deliberations (difficult person), his history and the honesty with which he/she filled out the juror questionaire. It appears he should not have ”qualified” to be on the jury.

I believe the jurors spent seven weeks of their time. The state spent thousands of dollars.

And yet he proved to be the only sane member of the jury. Go figure!

Marry him.

There is, with a certain sector, a most twisted sense of righteousness and morality.

I’d almost say it’s hard to figure out, except it is glaringly before us daily.

Domestic violence allegations raise questions about holdout juror in Lindsay Clancy trial

🔹https://www.nbcboston.com/news/local/lindsay-clancy-holdout-juror-had-history-of-domestic-violence-allegations/4013408/

Lindsay Clancy Trial: What We Know About Mysterious Holdout Juror

🔹https://www.newsweek.com/lindsay-clancy-trial-what-we-know-about-mysterious-holdout-juror-12419285

From the NBC link:

Lindsay Clancy trial: Takeaways from our exclusive interview with jury members

After a mistrial was declared in the case of the Duxbury mother charged with murder in the deaths of her three children, we sat down with three of the jurors, who told us their thoughts on the weekslong trial and the hectic deliberations.

We are not identifying him at this time because he has chosen not to speak publicly and the jury list is currently impounded. However, we wanted to share the details that experts say should have raised red flags about how he filled out his juror questionnaire.

In September of 2021, the holdout juror in the Clancy case faced a criminal charge for assaulting his wife out of Brockton District Court.

According to a police report, the juror's 13-year-old nephew called 911 after he said his uncle grabbed his wife by the throat and threw her into a dresser.

The report says the juror's mom repeatedly screamed, "You're evil!" as police arrested him.

Court records show the couple divorced after the incident and the criminal charge was later dismissed.

The ex-wife told NBC10 Boston this week that she did not want to testify in the case because she was worried about losing custody of her daughter.

Last year, that same teenage nephew referenced in the 2021 incident took out a restraining order after he said the juror pushed him to the ground and repeatedly punched him in the face.

The teen wrote in his affidavit that his uncle then said, "You ruined my (expletive) life," for calling the police and added, "You've had this coming your way for a long time."

That restraining order was still active when the juror was selected for the Clancy trial and listened to evidence for weeks in the controversial case.

"I don't see how they would've allowed him to be a member of this jury," NBC10 Boston's chief legal analyst Michael Coyne said.

I thought this was interesting for anyone who wants to take time to watch. It includes opposing views from some people in attendance.