Can you show a picture of the whole plant?

I have canaliculata dwarf and there are no ridges in the leaves.

Here is full plant pics.

This doesn't look like caniculata? After seeing NextOs caniculata vs. fischeri in another post, I would have thought different.

Thanks Lori, I checked that thread again just now. The new leaf with the bright banding and the still-visible faded banding in the older, bigger leaves says fischeri to me.

Canaliculata never shows banding in any stage, but it's one of the attractive features of young fischeri growths.

The larger growths don't look as dark green as they should be for fischeri but maybe they'll darken with age, the final mature stage leaves should be much darker and much taller.

Russ

I agree with Russ, I went to look over my fischeri and it looks the same to me.

Stush

Ok Russ and Stush, I bought this as fischeri, which, as you can see, looks nothing like the plant I'm asking about. What do you both think?

Lori, I think this is patens. It's certainly not fischeri. You're so full of sans surprises! I'd love to have your access to sans where you are, bad names and all.

Russ

Russ, I would be happy to share anything with you you want. Also, I'll tell you any of my sources you want. Just let me know.

I bought this from the same guy I bought the patens (I asked for an ID of way earlier) that piqued your interest then as well. He says these are just immature plants. If you look at the JC book you were referencing before under fischeri, he does show an immature fischeri at the base of the mature plants that doesnt look anything like this. And for that matter, in the same picture, the adult fischeri has strong markings even on the older growths where as mine has only minor markings on the new growth that fades to an almost solid green on the old growths. I did look at that book and compare but it's so hard to compare a picture to a plant sometimes. Oh well. I appreciate all the feedback though!

Thanks Lori! Sans ID's can be very frustrating!!

Russ