I didn't want to go off topic there and wanted to respond to your statement:
"This mom is obviously awful, big time. But if the mom checked out, there is still dad in existance. When i said parents, i meant parents not just mom. If dad is not there either, then somebody else adopts, fosters or become a guardian for a child. And then they are the ones to decide. Also when I think that my X is not being the best father he could and it effects DD, (not anybody else) I tell him that. I would not appreciate anyone else to make a mockery of his parenting especially in front of DD."
Finedreams, in a perfect world maybe. Do you think "every" parent that ends up with primary care because the other parent ran off and isn't being a parent, is fully equipped to handle the entirety of that responsibility? Just because you have a child does not mean that you want to "go it alone". Most people become parents as a couple. They don't expect to have 100% responsibility when the other parent bails. Should they be able to? Yes. Are they always prepared? No. A step parent offering assistance is NOT making a mockery of their parenting, they're being a partner. If the parent disagrees with a suggestion, they have the ultimate authority to dismiss it.
My husband loves his daughter. He's been involved more than 50% of the time since he broke up with her mom when their daughter was a year old. (he currently has primary custody because mom gave it up) When I met him, his daughter was five years old and was at least 15-20 lbs. overweight. He's very thin and I assumed that her mom must be overweight (thinking it was genetics). Then I met her mom and she was fairly thin too. Then one night, we were having dinner at his house and he gave her just as much food as he would eat. She was eating it all (it was a lot of food) and then he told her that if she didn't finish, she can't have dessert. He had told me before how much she loves dessert. He believed he was being a good parent. (My parents said the same thing to me and I also had a weight problem as a child: too thin & too heavy at times) He had no idea that he was doing anything wrong or was in any way contributing to her weight problem. It wasn't until I talked to him about portions and the food pyramid that he left it to me to fix appropriate meals (this was later when he moved in with me) and within a few months, she was at a normal weight (ie. she didn't have to cut several inches off the bottom of larger pants for school.) I also suggested that she play outside instead of always in front of the TV and video games. (how horrible am I?) Of course, her mom doesn't cook so when she's there, she gets lots of happy meals. She does what she wants when SD is with her and continues to let her eat as much as she wants (and SD loves food). She went out of state with her mom for ten days and came back and couldn't fit in any of her jeans. Her mom puts stretchy pants on her.
So, finedreams you can say that if mom bails, dad is the one to make all decisions but if SM sees that he doesn't have all the answers (and lots of moms don't either) then unless SM's decision is harmful to the child, what difference does it make? We are talking about people that are making decisions in the best interest of the child. Especially if the other parent is not involved.
Taking a four year old off the bottle is necessary. When I moved in with my ex, his daughter was 1. My daughter weaned from the bottle before she was 18 months. I let him decide when to wean his daughter and she was well over 2 and as a result, her front teeth were decayed. She was teased for it until they fell out. If I could go back in time, I would have insisted that she get rid of her bottle. Her mom wasn't in the picture at all and would not have cared one way or the other. Her dad refused to spend the money to fix her teeth (since they were baby teeth) and I wasn't in a financial position at the time to do it, or I would have. Sometimes the only person in the child's corner is a loving concerned step parent (and I wasn't even a step parent).
If both parents are involved on a constant basis (not just when it suits them) then yes, a step parent should stay out of making decisions. However, they still have a right to decide what goes on in their home. If they are authorized by one parent to take a child to a doctor visit or school event (field trip, etc.) then what's the big deal? Is it harming the child, or just the other parent's ego?
theotherside
finedreams
Related Discussions
TO: 'soonermagic' RE: Filteration Leak
Q
Judgmental BS (kkny & tos)
Q
KKNY, I'm not looking for a fight . . .
Q
tos and kkny, part 2
Q
finedreams
finedreams
imamommyOriginal Author
finedreams
hecallsmemom
finedreams
imamommyOriginal Author
ceph
imamommyOriginal Author
theotherside
imamommyOriginal Author
finedreams
imamommyOriginal Author
theotherside
finedreams
imamommyOriginal Author
hecallsmemom
finedreams
hecallsmemom
finedreams
imamommyOriginal Author
finedreams
hecallsmemom
imamommyOriginal Author
imamommyOriginal Author
finedreams
finedreams
ceph
ceph
hecallsmemom
imamommyOriginal Author
imamommyOriginal Author
finedreams
imamommyOriginal Author
ceph
finedreams
nannybee
theotherside
ceph
imamommyOriginal Author
theotherside
kkny
ceph
justnotmartha
imamommyOriginal Author