The people that this fellow was selling to knew exactly what they were buying and paid over $12/gallon and please tell me where it says anyone got sick from what he was selling. But he is not allowed to sell anything, now not just milk. I drink unpasteurized milk EVERYDAY, as does my whole family. We have never felt better. And infact some of us were suffering from intestinal problems until we started consuming unpasteurized milk. Yes often there are dangerous pathogens in milk, especially pasteurized milk, with no good bacteria to clean it up. There are also probiotics in raw milk that help one digest milk that are destroyed during pasturization. My husband has been lactose intolerant since he was a child, I have done A LOT of research on this subject and the whole reason that I wanted a milk cow is precisely because I wanted UNpasteurized milk. I have found nothing in all my research that supports any notion that "kids died by the thousands from drinking unpasturized milk." I did find stories that were proven to be a hoax and I believe the town was completely fictional. "Ladies' Home Journal, December 1944, began the campaign with the article 'Undulant Fever' claiming -without any acurate documantation- that tens of thousands of people in the US were suffering from fever an illness because of exposure to raw milk. And the next year Coronet magazine followed up with 'Raw Milk Can Kill You' by Robert Harris MD, who represtented as fact, a town and an epidemic that was entirely ficticious-Crossroads, USA" But there was no Crossroads and no epidemic. There have been some instances of illness that were due to consumption of raw milk that were from dairies that were producing commericial milk meant for pasteurization who sold to customers coming to the farm to buy raw milk.These accounts have been few and far between. Many dairies don't keep the best hygene just for the reason that they know the milk will be pasteurized, so to them it is ok that their is crap in the milk. So only in the instance of your large (like the ones that supply milk to 1.5 million) dairies that don't keep the best sanitary or hygenic practices I do believe if they are going to produce milk, they should pasteurize, I don't feel that it is a benificial food product. The Journal of the American Medical Association on December 11, 1987 reported that Over 16,000 culture confirmed cases of infections due to Salmonella typhimurium were traced to two brands of PASTEURIZED 2% milk produced by a single dairy plant. The number of people that were actually affected were estimated at close to 200,000. This was the largest outbreak of salmonella ever identified in the United states. Mark McAfee owner of Organic Pastures Dairy in California, an organic pasture based raw milk dairy recently has provided evidence of safety of raw milk from cows that are primarily pasture-fed. He keeps his cows on fresh green pasture all year. He took samples of his milk to a lab in Fresno where technicians introduced pathogens into the milk- Salmonella and E.coli OH:157. The organisms could not be found in the milk the next day-They could not survive. The university of California at Davis then came and took serum samples from several cows. They discovered that the amimals had developed no antibiotic resistance and their immune systems were so strong the good bugs that the cows naturally harber were able to kill off potential pathogens. Drinking this raw milk populates the human intestines withthe same good bugs, which is one reason the studies desribed above have shown that people who drink raw milk consistently are much more resistant to potentially pathogenic organisms than those who do not. Most of these examples can be found in Small Farmers Journal in a couple of different articles, "The Rise and Fall of Raw Milk" by Ron Schmid,, reprinted from Organic Farms, Folks and Foods, Mid-Fall 2004 and also The Safety of Raw vs. Pasteurized Milk" by the same arthur. It is well documented with the resouses stated in footnotes like any good research paper. These articles were in the Summer 2005 issue if you can find it in a library. I say, let this guy prove to everyone the safety and cleanliness of his milk, let him have it tested and as long as it test safe, on a regular basis, he should be allowed to sell it. http://www.realmilk.org/ http://www.realmilk.com/milkcure.html My point is, would you like for Uncle Sam to stand in the Drive thru at your favortite hamburger joint and tell you that you are not allowed to buy anything here because you are overweight and you have high colesteral. Or maybe they just shut him down because it is bad for some people to eat hamburgers, because it is red meat and fries etc. How many times does the government and some science have to be proved wrong before they stop trying to dictate what is good for you or not. Here it is not a safety issue its a power/ control issue of the local government agent. If there is full exclosure what is the problelm? Give the people a choice. Here is a link that might be useful: Real-Food.com

Joyce, Are you referring to the little red house cartoon? Do you have any slide bars at the bottom of the browser window? Are you sure holding ctrl and tapping + or tapping - does nothing? On my FF I can use them to move the little house all over the screen when resizing the browser view. Though a reset was previously referred through use of the keyboard, how about via the toolbar View>Zoom>Reset? DA

Finally I found the problem with Firefox. I had to allow third party cookies in order to come on and not have to log in. I am sending two links for you to read. http://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/fix-login-issues-on-websites-requrie-passwords#w_enable-cookies-for-the-website http://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/disable-third-party-cookies Please tell me what you think about this. One talks about making sure third party cookies are checked not sure what they mean about the disable- third- party cookies. But that was what the problem was, once I put the check mark in for third party cookies I stopped having problems with logging in. thirdfrt!!!

Sorry, I have to agree with Suzanne. Even though the picture is obviously staged it might have been funny with a very fake looking Easter Bunny instead of a lifelike rabbit. This is just my opinion and is certainly not meant to offend or judge anyone who finds this picture funny. Everyone sees something different and there is no right or wrong. I do agree Easter candy is hard to pass by and it's a constant struggle, no argument there! I wish you all the strength to fight off the Easter candy!!