Goldy, SpywareBlaster does not remove anything from your computer. Instead, it helps protect your computer from bad stuff. When you download it, be sure to click on "enable all protection". Then it should tell you that it has protected all the browsers that you use. The number of items listed in the database is just showing you how many things it is protecting. Mine shows 15770 items in the database. Yours will probably have a different number. You do not run scans with this program. All you do is keep it updated by opening it every few weeks or once a month and click on "Update", and after it updates, then click on "enable all protection". That's it. It just helps protect your computer and does not remove anything. Again, I would urge you to install WOT. With that, you don't do anything but pay attention to the ratings it gives different sites and stay away from anything that is not shown with a green circle.

spywareblaster is not a scanner type program it sits in the background and helps to keep you protected from malicious sites, I use it on all my windows computers and highly recommend it, you just install the free version, then click on updates, then click on the enable all protection so that the shield is green as long as the shield is green and you have all the updates you are good. I manually check for updates about once a week. for a good program that you can have on the pc no problems with any antivirus programs is malwarebytes. i would get the free version update it and run full scan with it once a week or so. Here are the directions, but I personally always do a full scan instead of the quick one. How to download and install Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware application for Windows computers I would do that scan now since you think you may have something on it now, let us know if it finds anything.

Gary Gee is the other nurseryman of America (after Bob Fincham) whom I met. It was in Cesko, he came there from Holland with dutch colleagues to Mr. Malik. Gary is a low level mailing person, by this way we have no more connection. He takes part in the Minnesota Broomhuntings as grafter and finder. The Minnesota broomhuntings were started in Duluth MN by 2 gardeners, who discovered 534 brooms with GPS in and around Minnesota. This story started about 2010 as Joe Braeu and Josh Horky used their GPS for discoverings. Since that time year to year many nurserymen are garhering in Duluth in February for the broom harvest. Dennis Hermsen USA Dennis is a well known nurseryman, who is also taking part in the Minnesota Broomhuntings. Joe Stupka USA Joe Stupka is a member of the 80's generation, as Chub Harper and a bit later. He found sometimes together with Chub, but mostly separated of him. His cultivars are over 100. Randy Dykstra USA Dave Horst USA Randy and Dave were working in Bickelhaupt with Chub Harper, sometimes cooperated with Jerry Morris. Their hands are on the Bickelhaupt collection. Dax Herbst documented their conifers in the last 10 years. The Conifer Master Diploms were posted by Dax Herbst some years ago. Tom Cox USA I met with Tom Cox in 2008, as he visited the Holata nursery in Cesko with ACS President Lady Kelly and members. I introduced them a vision about my conifer plans. This was a big ACS database, the Breeders Hall and other possible ways. I think I was bad or they didn't understood what I'd like. Maybe they thought, that I want money of them... After a while it was clear to me, that I must make myself, what I suggested to ACS presidents. That was the burn of the Conifertreasury.org. I made what ACS not wanted. Opened an org portal, based on my payments, hired servers for my portal. Jean Iseli USA The name Iseli is a good fame in America. I linked many facts about the Iseli selections. I sent him the Conifer Master Diplome personally. I tried also to build a connection to Don Howse, the former conifer propagator there, but I was not successful. I asked a guy to connect to him, but he closed the way before me to a man, who had a great knowledge of conifers. This guy was an ACS officier. Thats why Don Howse may be not well represented in the american conifer book. I'm very sorry of this, but its not my problem. Rich Eyre USA I always liked the conifer videos of Rich, but he realized his own conifer world. Sometimes alone, sometimes with other friends, like Jerry Morris. The Picea pungens RM series is their common find, 60 brooms in one place. His own selections are available in the book. Brent Markus USA Sam Pratt USA And finally lets have a synthesis of the previous news. Anyone can find the conifers on Conifer Kingdom. Brent started with a new concept of conifers. He collected a wide sortiment of the american conifers. There is the best of them. Every important ancestors are represented there. The Conifer Kingdom is so deeply american, that you cant imagine. If anyone say, that he doesn't sent any scions to Brent, simply eat them guys. Brent and Sam are the future for America in the next 50 years. Any problems, Dave?

morpheuspa: I asked to get clarification from somebody was, well, not you (I threw you two red herrings in my latest post; you found one, you didn't find the other and it was pretty blatant. When I sent your reply off to a friend of mine who's a physics professor, he had some rather unkind things to say that I didn't, of course, post because I'm not some other posters around here. I have no idea what you are talking about. morpheuspa: When I sent your reply off to a friend of mine who's a physics professor, he had some rather unkind things to say that I didn't, of course, post because I'm not some other posters around here. Please do not hold back. I want to see a nasty response from a Physics professor. If you have the courage please name him and his university too. You know full disclosure is important. morpheuspa: To me, it's increasingly clear that you are still confused about the water retention curves above and what they mean. Remember, that's also a force retaining the water in the soil. Of course, there is a force retaining the water in the soil. That is the whole point here. If you water a medium to complete saturation to the top and let it drain and let it come to equilibrium then you will have two zones in the soil. A lower zone that is completely saturated - a zone where all air space is filled with water. And an upper zone that is not 100% saturated. The boundary is the )Kpa tension. The height of this boundary is the height of PWT. If undisturbed then this saturated zone will remain saturated for ever. Above this zone water is still present within the particles and as a film surrounding the particles. But it is not 100% saturated - meaning there is some air space also between the particles. As go up towards the surface the film of water keeps reducing and air space keeps increasing. This is what is captured in the water release curves. Depending how tightly soil particles hold on to water, the release curves are different. Peat has a higher affinity for water and so a larger (taller really) zone above the PWT that can hold substantial water but not fully saturated. Bark on the other hand has a lesser affinity for water so holds much less water at the surface and rapidly comes close to being dry as move up from the 0Kpa boundary. Water release curves, in short, describe how easy or difficult it is to extract that water from the soil particles. Below the 0Kpa boundary there is a lot of free water (unbound and bound) and above it is only bound water. Adding a wick to the bottom of the pot moves the bottom soil/air boundary lower. Water above the wick is under positive pressure to move away from the soil. The wick extends the soil bottom boundary causing a reduction in pressure in the water column above. Thus it moves the 0Kpa boundary lower. If the wick is long enough this boundary can be moved below the pot. Thus effectively removing the saturated zone in the soil medium. The water release curves do not directly address this but does so indirectly. The key is that the wick extends the bottom boundary to a lower point. Many of the subtleties of what I am saying has been presented by Dale in this thread with good diagrams and explanations. I encourage you to go through them again. I welcome and encourage you to send this entire thread including my explanation to your Physics professor friend. In many threads you have boasted about your scientific prowess. I do not doubt that. I tend not to do that but instead try to explain the best I can. But do not under estimate my background. So keep it to logical explanations and if I am wrong I will gladly admit it.