I was stuck on trying to use the CR6 lamps with integrated trim. But since the trim is integrated the only way to use the would be to have the light 105/75 degrees (rather than 90) to the floor. I found an example where something similar was done https://www.houzz.com/discussions/are-you-using-recessed-lights-specified-dsvw-vd~58981-you-using-recessed-lights-specified-for--- but they had two matching side plus the large hanging light in the middle to balance it out. I'm not sure if my room will look right with only the one vaulted side. But the slant of the ceiling is not strong, so maybe I am over thinking this. I just found these regressed eyeball trims http://www.amazon.com/Cooper-Lighting-420W-Regressed-Eyeball/dp/B000JFKUQ0 they look cleaner that the old style that sticks out which I did want to avoid. The LED BR30 lamp is not as efficient or long lasting as the CR6.

The reason I asked why there were no existing lights is this part of the NEC: (2) Additional Locations. Additional lighting outlets shall be installed in accordance with (a), (b), and (c). (a) At least one wall switch-controlled lighting outlet shall be installed in hallways, stairways, attached garages, and detached garages with electric power. (b) For dwelling units, attached garages, and detached garages with electric power, at least one wall switch  controlled lighting outlet shall be installed to provide illumination on the exterior side of outdoor entrances or exits with grade level access. A vehicle door in a garage shall not be considered as an outdoor entrance or exit. (c) Where one or more lighting outlet(s) are installed for interior stairways, there shall be a wall switch at each floor level, and landing level that includes an entry way, to control the lighting outlet(s) where the stairway between floor levels has six risers or more. I was wondering why there wasn't anything there to begin with when it seems there should have been to get a CO.

Understanding you want to feel air movement on your skin from a bladed ceiling mount fan so it seems cooler. Realize that a fan of that type will just recirculate the same humid (after shower) air within the room and the blades will get caked with dust because of the moist air. But I actually read the OP so I know you want the same "feeling" results but recessed into a housing in the ceiling. However, if you go this route, realize the air will not recirculate in the same manner as does a bladed ceiling mount fan, unless you are standing directly below this grille. So going this route you have 2 choices: pull air into the housing or push it down. You will not "feel" pulling (exhausting) air unless it is around >1000cfm and the window is open (basically the size of a whole house fan). Pushing air is felt at lower cfm, but there has to be air above this fan in the housing to push down, so where does that come from? Ducted from outside, so possibly hot, humid, or too cold? So pushing air it is. But then realize code requires bathrooms to have a switched exhaust rate of 50cfm, and the air pressure has to be negative (meaning toilet air isn't pushed out into the bedroom/closet/whereever). Code does allow you to recirculate air within the bathroom, so if you are bringing in new air to a fan within a housing pushing this into the bathroom, it cannot be more than the exhaust rate. So what options does that leave you for hiding the fan? Maybe an expensive HRV, but you will not get the same "feel" of air on your skin. Maybe jerry-rigging a fan pushing air ducted from the same bathroom, but still probably won't get the same "feel." Maybe accept an oscillating fan sitting on the counter?

Thank you all for your insights! I will proceed to match the curtains on the breakfast area onto the living room -- the same height and color! I appreciate your help!