Standard v.s. Dwarf Rootstocks

6 years ago

I have seen some recent confusion on this forum with how various rootstocks work and how it is that a dwarfing effect is created, so I'm posting this to help clear it all up for those folks that are wondering ... for many of you it is already known.

" The nature of size-controlling, dwarf rootstocks’ roots
is different from that of full-size trees. They tend to be
brittle, constantly breaking off at the feeding tips. They
are narrower in diameter (and thus have less conductive
tissues) and most notably are less efficient at taking up
and transporting water and nutrients to the top part of
the tree. These factors, coupled with the roots’ limited
extent and thus ability to explore and forage for nutrients
and water, contribute to the dwarfing effect."

Sort by:Oldest

Comments (4)

timhensley
6 years ago
I never realized. Thanks for sharing.
gardengal48 (PNW Z8/9)
6 years ago
Since that comment is directed at me, let me just counter by saying your (borrowed) words would carry a lot more weight if you also provided the attribution.

I would also say that I understand very well how a dwarfing rootstock works to dwarf.......it is the broad (and unsubstantiated) generalization that they are a) more brittle then the roots of a standard sized tree and b) somehow mysteriously less able to absorb and transport water and nutrients than the roots of a larger growing selection. I find it rather interesting that all the fruit testing and rootstock evaluations that take place here by WSU (WA state is the largest apple producing state afterall) make absolutely no mention of this supposed phenomenon being unique to any sort of dwarf rootstock. It is not a common situation with any other selection of dwarf trees....why would fruits be any different?

And feeder roots of ANY tree - fruit bearing or otherwise - break off or die and are replaced constantly. That is just an aspect of tree morphology and has nothing to do with any dwarfing ability or not.
Related Discussions
dwarfing rootstocks for roses?
Q
Comments (18)
Thank you, Kim - as ever you are on the rose case.....but, urk, bonsai! I cannot get my head around why this concept is appealing to so many (men) - I have a bunch of friends (males) who are very keen on this hobby but it definitely does not float my boat in any way. At this point, no doubt a bonsai loving woman is going to jump on my head.....but I swear, this is one of those somewhat gendered interests (although probably less so in Japan). It is not so much the look of the plants as the idea of them, in those tiny little bowls - sorta like a plant foot-binding or head wrapping. On a more serious note, it is that disjunction between 'bending nature to our will' - which we do all the time, as opposed to allowing the 'natural' to predominate - obviously, there is nothing natural about most of our gardens (or they would be weed fields with a couple of natives) but nonetheless, we all draw a line (in our heads) of what we agree to be acceptable practice....and what we really would prefer to see vanish, along with trepanning, leeching and burying toads in midnight cemeteries. As an inveterate meddler though, I detect a whiff of hypocrisy in my own vicinity.
...See More
Dwarf Lemon Meyer Rootstock at HomeDepot
Q
Comments (11)
And, W&N will prune their Carrizo to "standard" lollipop shapes, which is also part of the "standard" definition. Other growers will market Carrizo as "semi-dwarfing" and not prune. If you read the last page of the "California Citrus Rootstocks" booklet produced by UC Riverside, you will see they categorize both Troyer and Carrizo as inferring a "medium" tree size. Swingle is small, C35 is small, C32 large, Volk as med/large (it can get VERY large here on my property) and Macro as medium (but betting that's not the case for John, who has ideal growing conditions for Macrophylla rootstock - his trees are big and get big, very fast). I don't think I would consider 6.5 acidic, but within the neutral range (6.5 to 7.5). Carrizo and Troyer are essentially indistinguishable, so what I say for Carrizo would apply to Troyer. You'll see most growers are starting to favor C35 now, due to size constraints, more precocious,produce fruit faster, as well as they are more tolerant to phytophthora. C32 is a full sized, standard rootstock. Spent some time talking to the curators of the Riverside Citrus Park, and they shared that most commercial growers are switching over to trees on C35. I agree - Carrizo has not fared as well in my yard as the trees on C35, due to my heavy phytophthora issues. But, if I can keep the tree alive, it will eventually mature enough to overcome any phytophthora issues, which I found rather interesting. Patty S. This post was edited by hoosierquilt on Tue, Aug 26, 14 at 14:28
...See More
Cuban Shaddock, a dwarfing rootstock? I doubt it
Q
Comments (21)
I have 30 citrus in containers and have not found any difference in the growth rate of trees marked standards and semi-dwarf. I think the containers limit the size more than the rootstock does. There are also variations in size according to the cultivar. A Meyer Lemon is not going to get large, no matter what! Bear in mind that 10-12 feet tall and wide is small for an in ground citrus in general. Also , I don't have any trees in containers smaller thanthe white pot in the post above. Typical is a 20" double rim italian terracotta pot weiging around 200 pounds with mix and plant. I would think that small pot will limit the tree to 4-5 feet above the pot at which point you will neet to root prune.
...See More
Vigorous, standard, crown rot & fireblight resistant apple rootstock?
Q
Comments (4)
Nicholas, The nursery cummins should be able to help you and this information should help you with the pros and cons of rootztocks www.ctl.cornell.edu/plants/GENEVA-Apple-Rootstocks-Comparison-Chart.pdf Call Cummins with questions but bear in mind its a loaded question your asking because some apples produce faster than others. A standard rootstock is slower than dwarf etc. Here's the website .http://shop.cumminsnursery.com/shop/rootstocks Arkansas black may not produce as fast as yellow delicious for example. Some apples take longer than others. All apples go through a process of growth http://www.starkbros.com/growing-guide/article/stages-of-apple-tree-growth
...See More
Joe Blow
Original Author
6 years ago
Gardengal, I already gave you the source once, but here it is again at the bottom. It is obvious to 99.9% of people that the original post on this thread was borrowed as denoted by the indentation and quotation marks. I suggest you read the entire article ... it will be very enlightening for you and hopefully clear up your mind on this topic ... and hopefully that will lead you to stop posting incorrect information.

For anyone interested, and extremely bored, this thread on rootstocks was created when gardengal posted this ... "And you also seem to be under some delusions about what a dwarfing rootstock is. They only have limitations regarding topgrowth.....they are quite able to expand their root system to meet their nutrient needs, as are any other trees."

https://casfs.ucsc.edu/documents/for-the-fruit-grower/rootstock-basics.pdf
Joe Blow
Original Author
6 years ago
It got awfully quiet gardengal ... are we to assume that you are retracting your statements regarding dwarf rootstocks which are in direct conflict with the pros at UCSC ... or are we to assume that your words are correct, and the folks at UCSC are just flat out wrong and publishing misleading information on this subject ?

You wrote :

"it is the broad (and unsubstantiated) generalization that they are a) more brittle then the roots of a standard sized tree and b) somehow mysteriously less able to absorb and transport water and nutrients than the roots of a larger growing selection.

Standard v.s. Dwarf Rootstocks

Comments (4)

timhensley

gardengal48 (PNW Z8/9)

Related Discussions

Joe Blow
Original Author

Joe Blow
Original Author

COMPANY

BUSINESS SERVICES

GET HELP

CONNECT WITH US

Standard v.s. Dwarf Rootstocks

Comments (4)

timhensley

gardengal48 (PNW Z8/9)

Related Discussions

Joe BlowOriginal Author

Joe BlowOriginal Author

COMPANY

BUSINESS SERVICES

GET HELP

CONNECT WITH US

Joe Blow
Original Author

Joe Blow
Original Author