Look through the list of youtubes and other info at the link below to see if you find the help you need. Describe what appears to be the problem with getting the saw going. A recoil starter problem could possibly be identified from Pics if it is wear or catch springs broken. Have you examined the recoil catch mechanics? Show good pics of both sides of what you see (on the flywheel and in the cover). <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /> I saw a or some diagram listed w/o opening any. Depending on your need a parts diagram might get you going. Also think about if it has been sitting a few years with untreated fuel a diagram w/n help to clean your carb. A diagram w/n help ck or adjust for spark. If you have broken or worn mechanical parts a parts diagram could be your friend. Approx what year model is the saw? Good Luck! http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=Homelite+Super+Two+Automatic+Oiling+recoil+starter+troubleshooting&ei=utf-8&fr=att-ie8

Hi Charlene, Rose No. 2 is definitely Chrysler Imperial. The pattern of the thorns, the leaves, those luscious crimson blooms (in that the petals curl under), and mostly, that FRAGRANCE! -it is the best rose fragrance ever- all give away its identify. I have two which I purchased at Home Depot last year and they are a delight. LOL. You will find that this rose constantly blooms. I think It was the best rose purchase I've ever made as I consider it the finest red rose ever. Here in Central Florida it has to be sprayed for black spot, but I use a solution of Sea Kelp and Fish Emulsion which works fine. Jack. P.S. The third picture in the second post, unfortunately, shows rose mosaic virus to be present in the leaves. This should not harm the overall health of the rose as I've had roses which never missed a step because of it and lived for years. I'm told there is to cure for it and it does not seem to harm the plants.

Not disagreeing with you, but this small-stature tree is less apt to tumble in the wind than a giant maple or oak. I don't have the numeric answer as to which of the two root system anomalies the two of us cite here are the most prevalent. They're both terrible. Around these parts, private landscapers all too often seem utterly oblivious to the "new" tree care. You know-the stuff that has come out since 1980! Too-deep planting, not unraveling the junk tied around root balls, not finding the root flare, using the top of the ball as a depth guide, using soil amendments in the backfill, not even attempting to make corrections to containerized root systems....it is almost as if these folks are willfully ignorant. There's a lot of "we've always done it this way" going on. Then there's the profit motive as excuse folks. "We can't make a profit if we plant that way".....Well, my answer to that, always at the ready, is that tree planting is a long-term project. The life of the tree should, if at all successful, be measured in decades, if not longer. Hence, another couple minutes taken to plant it correctly vanishes into insignificance over this timespan. Yes, preaching to the choir here this morning! +oM

Hi everyone, Thank you for your quick responses and kind assistance! I apologize for the fuzzy photos; I wish I had had the time to take more. Those of us in the States all flew down to Montreal rather suddenly with the news, and all took turns keeping a 24/hr vigil over our beloved matriarch at the hospital, and then at her home when she was discharged for palliative care. That said, I am thrilled that F.J Grootendorst has been identified--thank you @Magda (Ontario, USDA4/5) @Mischievous Magpie (CO 5b) @User @stillanntn6b! Ann, thank you for letting me know about Claire Laberge--I will find her contact info! @bart bart Eilleen, not impertinent at all--this would be a perfect solution, and would love to be able to do so! I forgot to mention in my post that I now live in Kansas, and would be unable to bring cuttings across the border. Other family members are not interested/do not have the space for these roses in their garden. @Alana8aSC thank you for your kind words, I hope so too! As for rose #1, @Mischievous Magpie (CO 5b) yes, buds are mossy, and @stillanntn6b yes, they certainly did look like acorns. Another interesting feature of rose #1 is that it bloomed beautifully in part shade, if not full shade, in some spots. It is intertwined with a number of grapevines and invasive shrubs. I don't know if this feature is due to the extent to which it has been established in the area, the prized soil on the island (my husband remarked that he could see "the silica sparkling in the soil"), or the variety itself. As for rose #3, I would say that the roses were already in full bloom by the time I arrived (June 3). I will see if I have other photos. Thank you again!