Should I keep whole life insurance policy?

10 years ago

I am a 36 year old male, non-smoker in relatively good shape. I am single (divorced) and have no kids. I don'the owe any alimony either. I currently have the following life insurance policy:

20 year Pay Whole life $25,000

20 year level term rider $225,000

The combined annual premium on these is around $715 per year, which I would only pay for 20 years since it's a "20 pay" policy. I should also mention that I get a life insurance benefit from my employer (2x my salary) for free with the option to buy extra coverage very cheap. This is only valid while I am employed.

I've heard Dave Ramsey and Suze Ormond talk about what a waste the whole life product is and they have some valid arguments. They recommend buying term and investing the premium difference.

So my questions...since I am single and don't have any dependents, should I cancel and cash in the whole life policy and the term rider and just stick with my employer's insurance for now? I figured I could invest the premium in something worthwhile like my 401k or a Roth IRA. If I was to die, my 401k would be more than enough to handle my funeral costs and remaining debt. Do I even need life insurance at all? Should I get some now while I'm still young-ish and in the "preferred" group?

Thanks for you help!

Featured Answer

two25acres

10 years ago

Regarding the whole life policy, when was it taken out and are there any surrender charges? What's it costing you? What interest rate are you getting on it? Why did you purchase it? As for the term policy, 20 year term means the rate is locked for 20 years, after those 20 years you will have the option to renew it at the given rate/age at that time. Maybe you don't need life insurance now but that will more than likely change in the future. Does your term policy have a conversion privilege? When did you take out the policy? How far into your 20 year term are you?Your employer offers you free coverage now, that can change. You may also leave that employer and go somewhere else. What if you have a condition that prevents you from getting life insurance down the road when you do need it. Your cost is very minimal for what your getting. I'd keep them.

Sort by:Oldest

Comments (8)

User
10 years ago
last modified: 10 years ago
Life insurance is a solution to a problem. Typically the problem is the chance of a premature death.

Problem: if I die, how will my wife be able to pay the mortgage, the credit card bills, etc?

Solution: life insurance.

You don't have that problem anymore, so you may not need the solution.

Yes, it gets more expensive the older you get. If you have a change in health you may not longer qualify for a policy.

Do you anticipate any future problems to which this particular policy is the solution?

The policy really is too small to be useful in estate planning. If your estate was over 5 million anyway.

Up to you. Just think of it as a tool. What are you going to fix with this tool? If you can't think of anything, well, you may have your answer.

Good luck!
Andy Henson thanked User
User
10 years ago
I allowed a whole life policy to lapse during my 40's because I saw no need. I now kick myself for doing that because it had a minimum 6% return. Before cancelling it check to see if there is a stated minimum. If I had continued paying for it the cash value would have helped fund my retirement. Hard to find that good of return on investments.
Andy Henson thanked User
Related Discussions
Life Insurance
Q
Comments (6)
Life insurance is not all the same. Some policies you have a time when the policy is paid up, so you are not continuing payments for ever. Also, depending on what type policy, your payments may stay the same and not be high. There is alot to consider. I was executor of my grandfather's estate. Here is one example. He had 4 paid up policies that left my grandmother with quite a bit of money and that is in addition to property, investments, etc. that he left her. On the other hand, my FIL cashed out his paid in full policy and invested that money. He passed away about 6 years ago and my MIL has a nice nest egg invested. They also had other investments, no debt, etc. but it has enabled her to continue the lifestyle she was accustomed to, which includes traveling. So, again, it depends on what you have. But to answer your question, and at the age you stated, and with no debt, etc. I wouldn't be paying high premiums. tina
...See More
Life Insurance
Q
Comments (7)
Thanks for the additional thoughts. I know I explained things sort of clinically and coldly, but DH and his ex-wife are very realistic about these things and we often talk about the possibilities of the future. When you have a kid like this, you DO need to be very practical. For example, when she turns 18 next year, she'll need to be adopted by us (her mother is bowing out), otherwise, she'll become a ward of the state and we don't want that to happen. WE want to make the decisions about where she'll live and who will care for her, not leave that up to the state. That's not to say that this isn't an emotional decision for DH, as has been pointed out. It certainly is, however, DH has had to remove himself from some of the emotion to make these decisions. The funeral is already planned, right down to who is doing what at the service - precisely so they don't have to worry about making those decisions when emotions are running high. There won't be a squabble about the finances, because we pay for everything as it is, even though step-daughter lives with her mother...we'll pay every last dime of the funeral, just as we'll pay every last dime of her existence until that point, and will do the same for step-son's college. That's just a given, since ex-wife has no money whatsoever (there was never any alimony required when they divorced, additionally she remarried before DH and I got married). Even though we foot the bill, in the interest of keeping the peace and out of respect for the kids, we do take ex-wife's opinions into consideration and more often than not, decisions are made jointly. As suggested, I guess I'll tell DH to decide if we do more research into insurance or pay the premium for this year and see where that takes us. We do expect the premium to go up every year and no, we have no idea of what life expectancy looks like. It could be next week or it could be several years. Sorry, looks like I've rambled a bit but wanted to provide a bit more context for the question. Thank you.
...See More
Whole Life vs Universal Life Insurance?
Q
Comments (21)
Depending upon your life situation (if you need insurance at all, some don't), a person should have anywhere from 4 to 7x their annual gross income in total life insurance. Life insurance, BTW, passes tax free to the beneficiary although it is counted in the total value of your estate for federal estate tax purposes. Wealthy people get around this by setting up ILITs (Irrevocable Life Insurance Trusts). As an Exec Asst for salespeople, I worked at CIGNA insurance for 13 years. I also worked at an independent CFP's office for 18 months, who was both a broker and insurance agent. I would recommend level term insurance - in fact, the CFP I worked for refused to recommend anything else unless the policy was for tax planning purposes, in which case he recommended Universal Life. Annual renewable insurance costs much more over the long run. Mortality statistics have improved so much that term insurance is quite simply, the most economical choice for just about everyone. And level term insurance means your premium will never change, regardless of your health situation, for the entire period it is in force. Insurance companies make a lot of money off whole life and even universal life policies. With the decline in the stock market, the advantages of universal life have suffered compared to straight term insurance. Never underestimate what long-term inflation does to cash values. It hasn't been that long since people thought $50K or $100K was a lot of life insurance - but these days, $100K buys very little if your family is trying to live off of it for the next 15 years, or trying to send two kids to college and grad school. Pick the longest term that takes you to retirement age. Most people GENERALLY do not need large amounts of insurance after they retire, but YMMV. Disability insurance, if you are not covered at work, is extremely useful up until the time you retire. But the underwriting standards are extremely strict right now, unlike life insurance underwriting. It is virtually impossible to get a policy for more than 60% of your last two years' income (verified by copies of your tax returns) even if you are in good health. In contrast, I am a standard risk, NOT preferred. I have $750K of life insurance for less than $80/mo that was purchased a few years ago when I was over 50. One is a 15-yr level term, and the other is a 20-yr level term. I have them for estate planning purposes. If I were to try to purchase whole life or universal life in that amount, the cost would be astronomical.
...See More
Should a SAHM have life insurance?
Q
Comments (17)
marti8a - After I gave my explanation to my agent he said he asked because it's important for people to clarify their reasoning. My reasoning is clear and with purpose as opposed to someone thinking they *should* have it 'just because' without a clear idea about purpose. He gave me a few examples of other clients. One was about a man who has a valuable business, 2 adult children, one who has always worked in the business and will inherit it in total, the other never involved in the business working as a teacher. His policy is to equalize the inheritance difference after division of non business assets. At the end of the day, it's a very personal decision and if it's important to you for whatever reason (and premiums are within your ability to pay) then that's all that really matters. Just make sure the payout is directed as you want. blfenton - my DH's first reaction was like your DH's. Then I reminded him that when my mom died, we had a 3 & 7yr old, he had started a big addition/remodeling to our house that he worked at on weekends and after his regular work day doing the same work for his customers! He was burning the candle at both ends and at huge risk of injury from that alone. The money from her allowed him to take off 3 months of work to concentrate on our home and allowed us some upgrades along the way. That gift from her was HUGE in our lives. And that's how I see it, as a gift. She didn't get to see our lives unfold or her youngest grandkids grow up but she planned to have a positive impact just in case. I should add, she also invested in college bonds for both our boys and they know how adding that into our savings and their work allowed them to graduate debt free - HUGE gift.
...See More
User
10 years ago
A 25k whole life policy will do little to fund anyone's retirement.

Again, what problem is the OP presenting to us to which life insurance is the solution? He's presented a pretty minimal overview of his situation. So there might be something! But so far, the need is pretty marginal.
Andy Henson thanked User
lucy132
10 years ago
I don't get the need for life insurance unless you have small children who need support/college/etc. if you were to die unexpectedly. If the employer funded insurance will cover any debts/funeral costs, and there is no spouse or family who needs support, what is the point? I think OP should use the money to invest in 401K, if he marries later and has dependents they would still inherit it if he were to die.
Andy Henson thanked lucy132
User
10 years ago
two25acres provided great advice. The insurance from work is tied to the job, it could change. You don't have spouse and kids now, but you may x number of years down the road.

You need more data to make decision such as what you would pay if you take out same policy today, or X number of years in the future.
Andy Henson thanked User
Elmer J Fudd
10 years ago
You've mentioned no obvious beneficiary you need insurance for - I'd drop it.

Whole life insurance can be a big financial positive - for the selling agent. Not for the customer. Until and unless your personal life situation changes, I think you're wasting your money by keeping it.
Andy Henson thanked Elmer J Fudd
joyfulguy
9 years ago
Usually with a 20-pay whole life policy, you pay a stated premium for 20 years and then the insurance continues throughout your life, with no more payments required.

If so, for how many years have you been paying on this policy? (How many more years of $715.00 per will it take to fulfill your obligation of 20 years in total to complete your end of the bargain/contract?).

If you are almost totally positive that you will never remarry, a wife who isn't able to care for her own needs with no financial infusion from you, at or after marriage and your death ...

... and if you're positive that you'll never have any children that may have need of care following your death until they are grown and providing fully for themselves ...

... and are absolutely positive that, should you collect such a wife and possibly kids, whether yours or included as baggage with the marriage, you'll be in almost-perfect enough health that you'll be able to qualify for insurance at that time, at a reasonable cost, or later ...

... then maybe it'd be a useful idea to let this policy lapse, collecting whatever benefit may have accrued, thus far.

But ... can you make the guarantees as suggested above?

Food for thought.

ole joyful

Should I keep whole life insurance policy?

two25acres

Comments (8)

User

User

Related Discussions

User

lucy132

User

Elmer J Fudd

joyfulguy

COMPANY

BUSINESS SERVICES

GET HELP

CONNECT WITH US