To post multiple images your photos will have to be on a web server that allows direct linking. The one that I use, and a lot of other people on gardenweb use it also, is photobucket. Go to photobucket.com and open a free account. Upload photos you want to post to photobucket. Under each of your pictures on photobucket will be several lines of code. Copy the one that is labeled 'html tag' and paste it in your post on gardenweb. When you preview your post your picture will show up where you pasted the html tag. A picture will show up for each 'html tag' that you paste in your post.

Do you have your posts set to 'latest activity'? It's the drop down menu to the top right of the list of posts... [see my other post with features found] I think if you set it to 'latest activity' it lists it with newest comments at the top. I found it challenging when I looked at the dates of each post over on the right. This is the date that it originated, not the date/time of the last comment. That keeps throwing me off.

Well so far, the only thing that works is deleting cookies. I don't know anything about add ons, I'd have to ask DH about that. There are a few scripts blocked in NoScript, but they aren't ones that are specific to this site or anything. I tried to temporarily allow all, and that didn't help. I don't have another browser on this laptop, maybe I'll try Chrome on my tablet. It's not that big a deal, I only need to log in when I want to comment, which I rarely do. I guess I can delete cookies to log out. Thanks for the ideas!

People who need to know a particular tree wants to grow over 60 ft. tall where conditions permit are those wanting to plant the same kind where there is room for one about 15 ft. tall. Something that happens a lot, particularly when many appear to think "big tree" = 15 ft. The physical demonstration of genetic programming recorded by those measuring fully developed examples illustrates the inherent character of trees being considered. Doesn't matter if they don't all grow 100 ft. tall everywhere, when even half that would overwhelm the planting site. Or that it might take 50 years for them to get big. It costs thousands of dollars to hire a qualified tree service to remove one big tree in a developed setting, where it can't just be sawed through at the base and allowed to fall where it may. And left to rot. Why ever choose a tree for an inadequate space, when a smaller kind could have been planted instead? Denial that a particular kind does often loom large does not prevent this problem from developing down the road. Plants that burn - or worse - every time there is a sharp winter may not really qualify as landscape staples. Certainly not as the ironclad, fail-proof unchanging purchases probably nearly all non-hobbyists are visualizing at the time they bring landscape plants home and install them. Hence the value of pointing out specific items aren't, in fact totally hardy - as in never damaged by cold. This is why there are hardiness rating systems and hardiness categories like fully hardy, half hardy and so on - people want to know where each plant falls on the spectrum, what to expect.