Sport or problem?
mbz10b
8 years ago
last modified: 8 years ago
Featured Answer
Sort by:Oldest
Comments (13)
sharon2079
8 years agoPatty W. zone 5a Illinois
8 years agoRelated Discussions
Problem or sport on June?
Comments (19)hey bungy ... next thing you know.. being sept and all.. they will fade to brown.. and die to the ground ... i am so glad you are excited about hosta ... but this time of year.. they do real funkly things ... bungy things ... just quite worrying about disease and problems ... as they said in that famous song.. its too late baby.. ohhh its to late ... thought we really did try ... crikey.. what song is that ... to make it .... ken ps: the only real problem you got.. is how to buy and plant more.. before they are dead to the ground.. lol ... Here is a link that might be useful: link...See Morewhirlpool duet sport- walking
Comments (14)Frankie57 is right, if the washer is moving around a lot the shipping bolts are the first thing to check. Then you should check the levelness. Asolo is right, anything close will do. The most important thing is that the feet share the weight of the washer equally. You can tell this by feeling where each foot touches the floor, and then trying to rock the washer. If you can feel the foot moving, then it's not set correctly. You only have to do this with the two front feet, because if they are set correctly, the rear feet will be set correctly as well. Then after all this if you still have a problem you can try Frankie57's idea concerning the double sided tape. Try it on the two front feet first and see if that fixes it. If you still have a problem then you can try putting it on the two rear feet, but they are going to be a pain to get to and you'll probably have to redo the front feet....See MoreNeed Wife/Ex-Wife Advice
Comments (136)"You are right, but this is about extras, not CS. If SM feels that on top of CS and regular necessities SD requires (during her 50/50) that BM is expecting Dad (and therefore SM) to pay for extras, I can see her problem." The problem is that not only are there bound to be plenty of costs for "extras" that are going to be incurred in raising children (I mean, if we're considering anything beyond food ---but not necessarily FAVORITE food, just food--- and, like, Hanes 3-pack basic white tees as clothing and the cheapest uglist Walmart notebook and Dixon Ticonderoga #2 pencils as "extras")... but that the definition of "extras" is very debatable... "It would feel like BM considers her husband's money as separate and not to be used for her child, but SM's to be part of Dad's available income. Who would be purchasing the sports equipment if there was no SM, and therefore no item to borrow? Assuming Dad's income was the same, and his CS and custody the same, could he afford this item on his own, or would he ask BM to split the cost? (BM could use some of her CS, or ask her husband to help.)If both parents were still single, how would the item be procured?" I just gathered that there happened to be already in existence in the house an item of the kind that was required, which was not being used by anyone else at the time it was going to be needed. In that case, why SHOULDN'T OP's daughter be able to use it? Is it inconceivable that OP's daughter would loan something to her step-sister in a similar situation? Has that never occured before? I mean, yeah, I suppose that for everyone to be perfectly even and everything to be perfectly fair, there should be two of absolutely everything in the house for each of the girls, no matter how easily worked out a sharing plan may be... just so nobody feels like BM is "getting off scot free" or "taking advantage" of the already-purchased hockey stick (or whatever it is). But why spend the extra money (which Dad would be, since he's presumably already paid for half of his step-daughter's item, we can presume he'd be paying half of this item too) or insist or suggest that someone else (BM) spend extra money when there is a perfectly good item right there, which will not be in use, and which the user of (step-sister) has already agreed to lending? It's not costing step-sister or SP anything to lend it, and if it's damaged it won't cost them anything either b/c Dad & BM would pay for a replacement. The only reason would be to (pardon the pun) "stick it" to the person(s) who would be asked to pay for a second one, in one way or the other. Now, obviously, if the item is lost or damaged, or if OP's daughter will be using such an item more frequently in the future, then it's appropriate to purchase another. But to go around and imply that anything shared in the house that's an "extra" has to be purchased separately even for one-time use is just not very family-like. In intact families, no one would dream of proposing a waste of money (on anyone's part) or excessive consumption (and clutter?) of this sort as a general practice... I guess that's what I find so colossally sad in these blended family situations. That, as much as many SP's regard the situation like the SK's are "spoiled" b/c they have two households, it's just as often that they end up getting shafted b/c everything gets nickel-and-dimed and bickered over to death. And I'm not even really thinking about in the *material* sense, but psychologically... How do you think it feels growing up where every little item or expense you require as a kid is argued over, debated, and you're made to feel like you're such a source of financial burden and your parents arguing all the time and the expenses paid for are all conditional on how well you (or your mom) behave? Like someone's sitting there all "ca-ching! ca-ching!" every time you express a cereal preference that costs an extra 80 cents, or scowl ("deduct a dollar for the "extra"-nice notebook b/c of your attitude! I don't HAVE to do anything for you!")... and you may, perhaps, be in the regular presence of a step-sibling who (b/c his/her parents aren't divorced) doesn't face the same kind of nickel-and-diming, or you feel like you have to run a decathalon of requests and requests-for-requests to DARE to borrow the item of its "rightful" owner, whom it WAS procured for, presumably without much hubub... I CERTAINLY can understand the need to budget to the point of splitting hairs (b/c there's no choice) when funds are tight (but in OP's case it didn't sound like that was necessarily the case)... but when the situation is more comfortable, nickel-and-diming is unnecessary and rather depressing. Not to mention an enormous waste of energy and a veritable minefield packed chock-full of potential explosions at every little teensy turn. (Which, btw, ain't so great for the marriage, either...) Come up with a plan, an agreement, based on reality, decency, common sense, and what you think "family" should mean and general principles of what will/won't be split (or set a dollar amount limit, or an age limit, or limit the extracurricualr activities by quantity). Figure out and decide once and for all on the definitions of "extras" you and spouse agree on and everything should fall into place. If this can't be agreed upon between current spouses, it is not the ex-spouse's fault, and they shouldn't be dragged into the mess. If the CS arrangement is unsatisfactory to both current spouses, seek to have it changed instead of whining/nickel-and-diming/b.s. psychological games. If it's satisfactory to one spouse but not SP, or if expenditures just CANNOT be agreed upon no matter what, then maybe consider splitting finances. But acknowledge that it is the CURRENT SPOUSES who cannot agree on expenditures or come up with a workable plan, so it isn't anyone else's fault or burden to bear if you two can't work it out between yourselves....See MoreOdd leaves... a sport?
Comments (2)Pale leaves with greener main veins on new growth is iron deficiency. It is usually caused by water logging or a pH too high (neutral to alkaline). Sometimes it is transient....See MorePatty W. zone 5a Illinois
8 years agolast modified: 8 years agombz10b
8 years agosharon2079
8 years agoPatty W. zone 5a Illinois
8 years agoSeeingreen
8 years agosharon2079
8 years agoAnne Zone 7a Northern CA
8 years agombz10b
8 years agolast modified: 8 years agoSeeingreen
8 years agolast modified: 8 years agosharon2079
8 years ago
Related Stories
FEEL-GOOD HOMEBack Problems? Try Putting Your Feet Up
Consider these alternatives to that one-size-doesn’t-fit-all sofa to avoid slumping and spinal stress
Full StoryFURNITURESlipcovers: Problem Solvers With Style
9 Great Ways to Change Up Your Look With the Ever-Practical Slipcover
Full StoryDECORATING GUIDESBicycle-Inspired Decor to Make Your Heart Race
Celebrate the Tour de France or your own love of cycling with home decor that champions the sport
Full StoryBEFORE AND AFTERS8 Bathroom Updates Have Ideas for Every Style
All white, classic vintage and brightly eclectic are just some of the new looks sported by the transformed bathrooms you'll find here
Full StoryBEFORE AND AFTERSJumbled Style Goes Vintage Chic in a D.C. Bathroom Makeover
Sloppy on the outside and alarming on the inside, this row house bathroom now sports a clean new look and systems that work
Full StoryLANDSCAPE DESIGNGreat Design Plant: Old Fashioned Smoke Bush
Balance garden color with this shrub's cool blue-green foliage, luminous when backlit and sporting yellow-green flowers in spring
Full StoryHOUZZ TOURSHouzz Tour: A Parisian Apartment Goes Modern and Bright
Sporting a rare terrace, this small French home gets stripped and redone to highlight the gorgeous skyline view
Full StoryKITCHEN CABINETSKeeping Cabinet Color on the Down Low
Give just base cabinets a colorful coat for a kitchen sporting character and a spacious look
Full StoryMATERIALSMesquite: The Brawny Beauty for All Over the Home
Denser than other hardwoods and sporting beautiful coloration, mesquite makes a fine material for flooring, countertops, furniture and more
Full StoryPRODUCT PICKSGuest Picks: Let the Ants Come Marching In
Catch the decorating bug — or maybe even a whole colony of ’em — with accessories sporting cute versions of crawly critters
Full Story
nikthegreek