Homemade Pickle Question
shambo
11 years ago
Featured Answer
Sort by:Oldest
Comments (22)
lindac
11 years agolast modified: 9 years agojimster
11 years agolast modified: 9 years agoRelated Discussions
Homemade potting soil / soil science questions
Comments (60)Hi, Tom After I scanned your article, the first thing I did was follow the link to the OSU research you cited. As I read through it, I didn't see anything different than what is contained in an article I wrote back in '94. The wording and discussion is actually so close to what I wrote, that I tried to find out whether that article was written after mine. I think that initially, adding a small fraction of perlite pumice, Turface, things that you usually consider as drainage material to a large fraction of peat, increases drainage, but only until the peat compacts/nests around the 'drainage' material. Perlite is normally included in commercially packaged soils at less than 10% of the whole. Doubling its presence isn't going to increase drainage or reduce the ht of the PWT, though it will reduce the total volume of water the medium is capable of holding. Illustration: start with 10 parts of fine sand that supports a 4" PWT. Add 1 part of BBs. Does the flow through rate change? How about the ht of the PWT or volume of air in the medium? Technically, on a per volume basis, there is a decrease in the % of air in the sand/BB mix compared to only the sand w/o BBs. All that changes is the 'volume' of water in the PWT. Peat may be slightly different because it's interlocking fibers may not compact to the degree that sand will, but remember that the fiberosity exhibits the same properties whether or not there is drainage material present. If peat compacts when there is no drainage material, it will still compact when there is. In order for drainage material to improve flow-through rates, it has to affect gravitational flow potential. In order to do that, it must great pockets where water molecules can adhere to themselves, increasing their collective mass. These large droplets then depend on cohesion to keep them together as gravity acts to move them down and out of the container. If drainage material can't create 'puddles and channels' within the media, it's not going to be effective. I want to comment on some of the things you mentioned as though we're conversing, so I'll make your offerings bold and my reply will be in default type: Drainage though is a bit of a false goal, or a goal based on an assumption. What we really want is to partially dry out the core of the mix at intervals between watering, which prevents that sour core-rot where roots won't live. My focus has always been on aeration, though I recognize the direct/converse relationship between drainage and aeration. The soils I build and suggest are based on the assurance that they will retain ample volumes of air for extended periods - that they are structurally sound. Of course, drainage automatically comes along for the ride. I don't think I would say "What we really want is to partially dry out the core of the mix at intervals between watering". My view is that there is no 'core' to speak of, because water that is not tightly bound to or in media particles moves down to occupy the PWT, which is actually the bane of most commercially prepared container media. Moisture locked in and on soil particles situated above water in the PWT moves quite freely through media by diffusion, so there is never a saturated 'core', only the PWT if the medium supports one. What we really want, is for the PWT to disappear as fast as possible, so a favorable volume of air can return to the soil ASAP. Roots in soggy media begin to die very quickly, often within a few hours or less at temperatures above 60-65*, so PWTs are a decidedly bad thing. Remember please, that here we are looking at media from the plant's perspective. I acknowledge that a PWT can be a necessity to accommodate our ability or our prioritization in terms of how often we can water, but that doesn't change the fact that media that do not support a PWT and need more frequent watering offer greater opportunity, within the limits of other cultural factors, for plants to grow to their genetic potential. That's an important consideration, because if we knowingly use a soil that supports a PWT because it's more convenient, we are sacrificing some degree of growth and vitality on the altar of that convenience. I try to build my soils to maximize water retention and still have no (or very little) perched water. The cyclic death and regeneration of fine rootage exposed to the anaerobic conditions of media that support PWTs is very expensive from the perspective of energy outlay. Energy that might have gone into blooms, fruit, foliage, or just increasing biomass, must be directed to root regeneration subsequent to each time we dare allow our planting to be irrigated to container capacity. Surely drainage helps and is good generally, but you are assuming it is the only way. I think you can see from my offerings that how I approach container media is more complex than only a single narrow perspective would allow. Al I've seen in your other posts where you refer to capillary action of soils as a negative. I couldn't disagree more. Capillary action is the savior of a soil mix; it's the vehicle that brings wet core water & water from the perched water table you described up to the drying surface, and balances moisture throughout the pot. It eliminates the perched water table. Peat has it and bark doesn't. I've never referred to capillary action as a negative. It just is what it is - the product of adhesion + cohesion - no more friend or foe than gravity or diffusion, which is something you didn't consider. Plants absorb water a molecule at a time, and water readily diffuses in media of large particles due to superior gas exchange. Here again, it's kind of a personal choice. You may prefer a soil with good wicking capabilities, but along with that comes the fact that the better they wick the more perched water they support. I, on the other hand, prefer a soil with good gas exchange (diffusion) and no PWT. The price I'm willing to pay is a strengthened watering can arm. ;o) Bark and peat feel dry to the touch when they reach about 40% moisture content, but plants can still extract water from media particles down to about 30-25%, so 'feels dry' isn't necessarily dry. There's a cush there. I understand what's required for wicking SWCs and how water retention in wick-irrigated media varies from media watered from the top, so we can save that talk for another time. Water starts to perch in containers when the soil particles are something just a little larger than .1". As particle size decreases, the ht of the PWT increases inversely. Whether or not bark holds perched water depends on it's size. Obviously, bark the size of Sugar Pops will hold no perched water, but bark ground to the consistency of peat will. Peat may initially hold more air and water than composted bark, but we all know that compaction is a considerable issue for peat; and conifer bark breaks down at roughly 1/4-1/5 the rate of peat, all cultural influences equal. I point to the fact that I always suggest partially composted or uncomposted bark in the soils I use, in sizes up to 3/8" to ensure no or minimal perched water. The grower can then add finer particulates as he/she sees fit to adjust the water retention of the media. When you start with fine particulates, it's very difficult to amend them to increase drainage/aeration, though as noted above, you CAN add materials like perlite that decrease the volume of water the soil can hold. It just makes more sense to me to approach this from the perspective of building a soil that holds no perched water, but is capable of holding an adequate volume of water in micro-pores, leaving macro-pores largely open, than it is to adopt a soil that, at container capacity, always has a significant fraction of available macroporosity clogged with water. Again, it has much to do with trade offs and what we are willing to do insofar as watering frequency (convenience), but the more highly aerated soil with better gas exchange, which occurs partially because we need to irrigate more frequently, offers better potential. I've grown extensively in both, and if the results weren't significantly better, I'd probably still be growing in a peat or compost-based soil. As always, YMMV. Good talking to you Tom. Al...See MoreQuestion about the homemade laundry detergent.....
Comments (29)Judging by how long it took the grated soap to melt in the pot, I'm wondering if the powder would leave little bits of gooey soap on the clothes in the washing machine? I think that might be a valid concern, Nicole. And it doesn't "melt" as well in hard water, which I have. I think I will stick with the liquid form. Joann, my front loader calls for the "HE" detergents, and I put the homemade liquid in the dispenser in the top. No goopiness there. The water fills thru the dispenser & thus rinses out the dispenser. I would think if there is a problem with it not all getting out of the dispenser into the wash tub, it would happen regardless of if the detergent were liquid or dry....See MoreHomemade pickle relish!
Comments (12)Here's the Recipe......it's so easy!! Georgian Pickle 10 medium cucumbers (I bought a 3-litre basket, they were about 6" long and used them all) 8 large onions 3 green peppers 3 red peppers Peel onions and seed cucumbers and peppers. Process in a food processor or food grinder until of the consistency that you want. Sprinkle 1/2 cup table salt, stir and let sit at least 3 hours or overnight. Drain well. Sauce: 1 quart vinegar 7 cups sugar 3 tsp turmeric 1/4 cup mustard seed 2 tbsp celery seed Bring to a boil and stir in the cucumber relish. Simmer 20 minutes and pour into sterilized jars. Turn upside down and let cool, and sealed. This post was edited by jasdip on Wed, Sep 3, 14 at 17:45...See MoreSweet Large Cucumber Pickle canning question
Comments (11)"how do you know how long to boil it for with the boil water canning method? And why is it no longer safe after decades of it being okay?" How long to process them is found in any of the beets recipes that are in any of the canning books, even the very old ones. BWB processing of them has always been required, or at least from the 1923 Farmer's Bulletin series of canning pamphlets and the 1925 edition of the Ball books were published. I have an antique edition of the the Ball Blue Book of Canning from 1930's that calls for processing them submerged in a boiling water bath for 20 min. Current instructions calls for 30 mins. Your problem I think is you are using family instructions, not canning book instructions and your mother apparently chose to eliminate that step for some reason or that was how she was taught and so didn't know better. Open kettle canning recommendations were stopped based on testing research done in 1920-1922 by USDA. It only continues today in older generations because people didn't stay current with changes. I'd suggest you invest in a current edition of the Ball Blue Book or explore all the online resources available online at NCHFP. http://nchfp.uga.edu/ Dave...See Moredgkritch
11 years agolast modified: 9 years agoannie1992
11 years agolast modified: 9 years agocentralcacyclist
11 years agolast modified: 9 years agoshambo
11 years agolast modified: 9 years agolpinkmountain
11 years agolast modified: 9 years agolpinkmountain
11 years agolast modified: 9 years agoannie1992
11 years agolast modified: 9 years agojessicavanderhoff
11 years agolast modified: 9 years agolpinkmountain
11 years agolast modified: 9 years agojessicavanderhoff
11 years agolast modified: 9 years agojessicavanderhoff
11 years agolast modified: 9 years agoshambo
11 years agolast modified: 9 years agolpinkmountain
11 years agolast modified: 9 years agoannie1992
11 years agolast modified: 9 years agoshambo
11 years agolast modified: 9 years agolpinkmountain
11 years agolast modified: 9 years agojessicavanderhoff
11 years agolast modified: 9 years agotomlori32
8 years agotomlori32
8 years ago
Related Stories
OUTDOOR PROJECTSBring In the Birds With a Homemade Bubble Rock
An avian expert from Southern Indiana shows how to make a burbling fountain that migrating birds will love
Full StoryBEDROOMS13 Homemade Headboards That Thrill With Creativity
Snipped from a trellis, snagged from a pallet pile and more, these inventive headboards excite in any bedroom
Full StoryGREEN BUILDINGHouzz Tour: Pickle Factory Now an Energy-Wise Live-Work Space
A charming but poorly insulated 1880s Philadelphia commercial building becomes a spacious energy-efficient home and studio
Full StoryHOLIDAYSA Fresh and Fun Hanukkah Dessert Table and Wrapping Station
Celebrate the Festival of Lights with gelt pouches, homemade snacks and wrapping supplies as pretty as any party decor
Full StoryKITCHEN DESIGNKitchen Luxuries: The Wood-Fired Pizza Oven
If you love homemade pizza and are (ahem) rolling in dough, a wood-burning oven may be just the right kitchen investment
Full StoryFURNITURESmart Shopper: How to Judge Antique Furniture Quality
Pick the treasures from the trash without expert experience by learning how to evaluate antiques and what questions to ask
Full StoryKITCHEN DESIGNA Cook’s 6 Tips for Buying Kitchen Appliances
An avid home chef answers tricky questions about choosing the right oven, stovetop, vent hood and more
Full StoryFUN HOUZZHouzz Quiz: What's Your Decorating Style?
Answer these 9 questions to find out what decorating style suits you best
Full StoryDECORATING GUIDES8 Reasons to Jump Off the DIY Bandwagon
You heard right. Stop beating yourself up for not making stuff yourself, and start seeing the bright side of buying from others
Full StoryFEEL-GOOD HOMESimple Pleasures: Make Do and Mend
Experience the satisfaction of fixing, repurposing and creating things yourself around the home
Full Story
Lars