Mortgages vs. loans

16 years ago

I'm fuzzy about mortgages (fuzzier than I should be for sure) but it seems there are a lot of fees, points and insurance fees involved.

If one had a pretty significant chunk of a down payment but was short say 50,000 on a 200,000 house - is there anyway to secure a "regular" loan?

Possibly a truly stupid question i don't know. I know most loans require some sort of collateral whether a mortgage or a loan. But if your buying a house with a down payment that results in significant instant equity, why can 't that be collateral for a loan?

Sort by:Oldest

Comments (10)

dave_donhoff
16 years ago
Hi Marys,

I'm fuzzy about mortgages (fuzzier than I should be for sure) but it seems there are a lot of fees, points and insurance fees involved.

All such fees are for the myriad of legal processes and diligence required for that degree of risk on that size of a loan related to real property.

If one had a pretty significant chunk of a down payment but was short say 50,000 on a 200,000 house - is there anyway to secure a "regular" loan?

What do you mean by "regular"?

If you mean NOT secured by real estate, the answer would be;
Maybe... if you otherwise have a strong enough credit history.

Possibly a truly stupid question i don't know. I know most loans require some sort of collateral whether a mortgage or a loan.

Not at all... you can get cash-advances on your credit cards, and signature (personal) loans from your checking bank without any collateral at all.

But if your buying a house with a down payment that results in significant instant equity, why can 't that be collateral for a loan?

It can be, and is used to collateralize home loans all the time. Realize, however, that you are once again asking the bank to now link your real estate back into the transaction, which pulls back into play all the legal process & diligence once again, and all the related fees to pay for all the related service providers.

Your cheapest borrowed money is the funds you pay "all those fees for" in relation to your mortgage... simply because the lender has the greatest and most secure collateral in place to guarantee their principal.

Hope that helps in the clarification.

Cheers,
Dave Donhoff
Strategic Equity & Mortgage Planner
dadoes
16 years ago
The great majority of "those fees" are BS, pure palm-greasing for the loan bank, appraiser, title company, RE agent, yada yada.
Related Discussions
Mortgage loan
Q
Comments (18)
Owning the land does help. However, another thing that goes into it is how long you have owned the land. Depending on how long you have owned it will determine whether you can use cost of the land or appraised value. The appraised value will determine how much you will have to put down. For example, if you just bought the land, the house as built appraises for 350k, and the actual cost to build is 250k, then you have 71% loan to value. However, because you have not owned the land long, they will go with the lower of purchase price or appraised value, so 250k + 37k = 287k which is 13% LTV and you would need to put ~21k more in to get to 80% LTV. BUT, if you have owned the land for a while, the house as built appraises for 315k, and the actual cost to build is 250k, then you have 80% loan to value and you would not need to put in anything more to get to 80% LTV. Finally, if it appraises for less - for example, it only appraises for 260k and costs 250k to build, then you are at 96% LTV and would need to put 42k more in to get to 80%. In this case it would not matter how much you paid for the land or how long you have owned it. I agree with calling around to a lot of different banks. US Bank might have a good loan program, however for our scenario, it was not the best deal out there. Some of the ones I found to be competitive included RBC Centura, Suntrust, BB&T, Wells Fargo, Fifth Third Bank, and some other banks that are very local to our area only. Janilyn, the builders that we interviewed were all able to bid based on plans we drew ourselves in 3D Home Architect / Chief Architect. None of them required any money upfront to bid on the job. Only after we narrowed down the field and then chose a builder did we have the final plans drawn by an architect. If you are choosing a builder model and making minor changes to it, I do not see why he would require money upfront. The appraiser may not necessarily need the final plans either. They can likely appraise with the builder model plans with your changes written in on them. Only once you go under contract with the builder, they often require a downpayment upfront. I would have the appraisal done first before handing over 6k nonrefundable.
...See More
Mortgage advice... Cash out refi or conventional loan?
Q
Comments (3)
I am going to be working under a similar arrangement. It is my understanding that it will be a refinance because you are basically refinancing a lien that is on your property. In my case, it is a construction loan through a bank but in the builder's name since the rate is so much lower and the bank will take a lien against the property. I will be interested in how this works out for you. A few lenders that I have talked to seemed to be confused by this but my reading of the Fannie Mae rules shows it to be a refi. It may also depend on how long you've own your lot.
...See More
Advice needed: rent, mortgage, construction loan,
Q
Comments (7)
Only you can decide what the right scenario is. Your gut will usually steer you in the proper direction. I can only tell you how free my husband and I feel right now without any loans on our property. No one can take it away from us if times get really sour. Naturally, you still have taxes, insurance, and upkeep, but building a reasonable home takes the pressure off of that. We look at our land and feel thrilled that it is truly ours. As long as someone has a loan on their home or land, they do not own it, the bank does. Try missing a payment or two if disaster strikes and see what happens. Disaster can be a major unexpected illness or accident, natural disaster in an area, or economy based. Was it a hassle to sell a house while living in it? For sure! I hated that process. (Fortunately, we sold in under a year). We decided the short term nuisance of selling while in the house was still better than owing a bank for more money. The interim of not being in my new home yet is difficult at times. I'm in a small place in the meantime. I'll admit, I'm spoiled and want it now. However, in the home scheme of things, it's only a short term inconvenience, and then I'll be through with construction and in my home. And I do have a decent roof over my head in the meantime. Also totally ours. As far as construction loans go, yes, they are given out in draws, but we had been locked into an interest rate that was good for the life of the construction loan, and grandfathered into the mortgage itself. However, the way the banks are now, that may no longer be the case. Keep in mind that a lot of banks will not let you be the owner/contractor, but it doesn't sound like that is the way you want to go anyway. Now the issue about equity loans. They are hard to come by these days, even with a perfect credit score. I have a friend who is vice president of a bank. She said that they have had many people borrow against a home they are currently in, and no longer wanted. Of coarse, they never tell the bank they no longer want the home. They say they want to make improvements, or whatever. With the real estate market what it is, it can take time to sell. So, they are buying another home with the equity money and letting the bank foreclose on the one that was no longer wanted. This has made getting home equity loans harder to get than hens teeth, and hurts the honest people. You may also find it very difficult to get the equity loan processed, funds dispersed, and a new home totally constructed ready to move in, within a year. Even with a reputable builder, homes are seldom done in the exact time frame we want. The banks are approving loans, setting closing dates, and then either pulling the plug for some lame excuse three days before closing, or re-setting closing dates over and over, due to "needing more papers filed" that come out of nowhere. Good luck in whatever decision you make. It's never an easy one, and I wish you the best.
...See More
Pay down mortgage or pay off student loans--?
Q
Comments (10)
You can get either death or disability insurance on your mortgage, or both. There's about four times the possibility of disability for an extended period that there is of death ... and, while a funeral is expensive, dead people don't eat, but disabled people do ... and may need medical/rehabilitative costs, as well. Some prefer to buy a term policy for one or both, themselves, for if the bank sets it up, they are the payee, not the person(s) purchasing the home, whle if the homeowner purchases it, they are the payee and it will be their responsibility to pay the lender. Some prefer to have coverage at a specific level throughout, rather than the decreasing value as the principal gets paid off, as usually there is little difference in premium, and as the debt is reduced through regular payment down of principal, there is some extra available to support the family in a difficult time. When paying student loan, usually one knows what portion of the payent goes for interest and which goes to pay down principal owing. But the level of mortgage payment remains level throughout, which means that in the early days of the loan, when the balance owing is high, the amount that goes to interest each year must be high, meaning that little of each payment goes to pay off principal. Many people pay little attention to the amount of principal that is paid off annually through the first few years, though many of them received a schedule showing what the ratios were at the time of each payment, throughout. They are greatly surprised when they find out how little of the principal has actually been paid, at the end of each year. They are suprised to learn that, in those early years, if they made an additional payment of an amount equal to one of the month's payment, designating it as to reduce principal only, it would reduce the balance owing by a larger amount than did all of the other 12 monthly payments. With student loans, the amount allocated to principal and to interest is more easily identifiable, I think. Good wishes. ole joyful
...See More
azzalea
16 years ago
I thought that it was a serious red flag, and counted strongly against you, when buying a home, if you had borrowed the downpayment. Maybe it's a state thing, but I know they always ask you where and how you got your downpayment, and it's not supposed to be borrowed.
Chemocurl zn5b/6a Indiana
16 years ago
If one had a pretty significant chunk of a down payment but was short say 50,000 on a 200,000 house

Are you sure that is what you meant to say...short $50K on the downpayment on a 200K house? Just how much were you wanting/needing to put down for a down payment anyway.

Is it even necessary to put down 25% (assuming you have no other money for the down payment? I have to admit, I am not up on 'financing and the requirements in the different parts of the country, as I know they vary greatly.

My 'guess' is that maybe you are just wanting to borrow $50 and that would be all that was owed against the house.

What am I not understanding here?

Sue
duluthinbloomz4
16 years ago
Maybe I'm reading something into this that isn't there... a mortgage is a loan. Even in today's market, there shouldn't be too much problem securing a conventional 30 year loan from a reputable lender if (1) your income to debt ratio is in the acceptable range and your job indicates you're a good candidate to keep up with the payments; (2)you have perhaps a 20% downpayment available - ie 40k on a $200,000 house; and (3)your credit history is decent, payments made on time, etc. etc. I'm sure there are more I'm overlooking, but it's been a while now since I was buying and/or selling houses.

I do remember getting nickled and dimed to death with really off the wall things as dadoes mentioned; and unfortunately, those are just part and parcel of the process.
marys1000
Original Author
16 years ago
Whoops sorry, I do mean only 50,000 short on a 200,000 house. I guess why I'm asking is, is there a way to avoid a mortgage if the loan amount is "relatively" small. I find mortgages incredibly complicated. Complicated to the point I think they do it on purposes, its too easy to not understand what's going on and then on top of that are all the fees, points, closing costs.
I know I can get one, I just don't want one.
Chemocurl zn5b/6a Indiana
16 years ago
You might check with a credit union. I belong to one and years ago they had a special where one could apply for a home equity line of credit, with no fees associated with the application/ loan whatsoever. They came out and did a full appraisal at no cost to me. If/when I need any or all of the approved amount I can write a check for the $$.

At the time I think they would approve the loan amount for 80% of the appraised value.

Sue

Here is a link that might be useful: Locate a Credit Union
marys1000
Original Author
16 years ago
I know you can get a home equity loan if you own a house.
But can you get one (or some other type) to help buy a house?
quirk
16 years ago
"home equity loan" is just another word for "second mortgage". (like "preowned vehicle" equals "used car")

If you want to use the equity in a house as collateral for a loan, the bank will want to be assured that you have clear legal title to the house, that you have the house properly insured, that the house is worth at least as much as the loan. (actually, same for any loan backed by collateral; they make you get car insurance and hang on to the title until your car loan's paid off too). It's usually easier the second time because you've already gotten everything you need (title search, title insurance, homeowner's insurance, appraisal) when you bought the home and got the first mortgage, so you don't need to do it all over again (except the appraisal) just provide the bank the information of what you did before. So, Dave can correct me if I'm wrong, no you could not get a "home equity loan" with less paperwork and lower fees than a "mortgage" while buying a house-- because they are in reality the same thing. You could possibly if your income and credit are good enough get a personal loan not backed by collateral but the interest rates would be significantly higher than a mortgage because if you don't pay the bank just eats it doesn't get to take your house.
quirk
16 years ago
A lot of the things they want (the ones i mentioned up there, title search, homeowners insurance) are things you need anyway to protect *your own interests* when you buy the house. You do not want to buy a house unless the people you're buying it from have clear legal title, which is what a title search is for, for example. You want to insure your house whether or not the bank tells you you have to, right? yes, there are also a fair amount of stupid piddly stuff ("document processing fees" etc) but if I had to guess I bet the banks that tack those on to mortgages tack them on to *all* their loans so getting a different type of loan isn't going to save you from those. I don't think. This is where choosing your bank or credit union or whatever-- comparison shopping-- might come in handy, but I doubt you can avoid them by getting a not-mortgage loan. (although maybe i'm wrong, i've only ever had student loans and mortgage and the student loans were pretty much by the rules of the fed loan program)

Points can be confusing and all the different types of mortgages available can be confusing but they also give you options. If you want to give up options in favor of simplicity then just get a conventional mortgage with no points. While that may or may not be the absolute best possible mortgage you can get in your specific situation, it is as simple as you can get in any kind of loan. The bank gives you X amount of money at Y interest rate and you pay it off in equal installments over Z months; this is the same deal you'd get, say, if you took out a student loan to pay for college.

Mortgages vs. loans

Comments (10)

dave_donhoff

dadoes

Related Discussions

azzalea

Chemocurl zn5b/6a Indiana

duluthinbloomz4

marys1000
Original Author

Chemocurl zn5b/6a Indiana

marys1000
Original Author

quirk

quirk

COMPANY

BUSINESS SERVICES

GET HELP

CONNECT WITH US

Mortgages vs. loans

Comments (10)

Related Discussions

marys1000Original Author

marys1000Original Author

COMPANY

BUSINESS SERVICES

GET HELP

CONNECT WITH US

marys1000
Original Author

marys1000
Original Author