Houzz Logo Print
marthapartha

Vista and Monitors

19 years ago

Based on the replies to the question of the 'why widescreen' I'm not quite sure if this will be answered, but we will give it a go.


My aunt is purchasing the fabled HP Slimline s7700n either March 12th or 13th. It does not come with a monitor.


The little computer comes with Vista Home Premium...which of course is best viewed on a wide screen with a minimum res of 1440 X 900.


Most retailers are pairing the little budget computer with a 19" 1440 X 900 res screen. I picked out a nice deal on a 19" Samsung Vista compatible/approved/ready monitor.


Double checking the reviews, an Amazon purchaser reported that the 1440 X 900 res had been disabled by HP to prevent overheating of the little computer (its tower is slightly larger than a Mac Mini). The owner enabled the 1440 X 900 res through bios and informed HP support who apparently replied that it wasn't advised.


There are a few 1280 X 1024 res screens that are Vista approved, and I might be overstating that fact with the word "few" meaing equal to or more than three.


I have written HP about the 'overheating' debate as to whether it is true or not. I am still waiting for a reply, they will get to me when they get to me.


After all this my question is:


How important is it to have a Vista Approved/Ready/Compatible Monitor with the Vista OS? There are some great deals on 1280 X 1024 res monitors (both 17" and 19") that don't have the Vista stamp of approval, is it a mistake to even look at them for Vista Home Premium?


I await your answers with bated breath.


marf

Comments (2)

Sponsored