Hardscape: Static vs Non-static
ironbelly1
17 years ago
Featured Answer
Sort by:Oldest
Comments (32)
rusty_blackhaw
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agoironbelly1
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agoRelated Discussions
Potpourri
Comments (20)Front yard/back yard design: I guess when I got really serious about gardening, I decided that I DO NOT CARE what the neighbors think. I get just as dirty in the front yard as the back yard. I adopt the gardeners' signature "bottoms up" posture without regard to casual drivers-by. (It helps that several of my neighbors are gardeners, too - no funny looks from others who regularly go throught the same humorous posture changes to weed/prune/mulch/etc., just as I do.) So, in a sense my whole yard is as relaxed and refuge-like as my back yard. I act that way, and as I have learned more I've consciously designed it that way. I could never survive in a neighborhood with a committee to arbitrate "good taste" and dictate certain design restrictions to the residents. I just would not choose to live there. By the same token, I'm too much of a control freak to want someone else to design and install any part of "MY GARDEN," unless I had some really knotty hardscape problem that called for professional know-how and equipment. But it doesn't necessarily follow that someone who seeks professional garden design and installation services is not a "serious" gardener. A knowledgeable gardener might need help with any number of factors outside their area of expertise or interest. They may need something done in a time frame unreasonable (or impossible) for a single person or couple to accomplish. They may want fresh ideas from another perspective, or they may be moving to a climate they are unfamiliar with. It must be a balancing act for landscape design professionals to juggle their own experience and ideas with those of a client-gardener with their own well-defined ideas and areas of interest. I'll bet designing for and with an avid gardener is much harder than designing for someone with little or no garden experience and the simple desire for an attractive, easily maintainable landscape. Laurel...See MoreNative TX Gardner Needing to Use Non-Native Bamboo
Comments (6)Bummer. That said, I am not a purest about anything. I think that if most of your yard is catering to wildlife , that this will not tip the long term effect. I think that bamboo is a good dirt builder and birds love it. Wildlife is also attracted to non native species.. My only concern is the damage that it might do to the foundation over the years. The clumpers do expand out in a formidable root mass when happy. Are they allowed to build right up to the plot line? I had old ubiquitous running bamboo that we contained in retaining walls and it got above 2 floors and would have done most of the third floor. I imagine with the hanging over of the crown yours will create zones of privacy, maybe not complete privacy. I think that you will get used to it after a decade or so. I found that we are flexible humans and the allusion of privacy is often just as good as complete privacy in our minds.. Is there anything else that you can plant. I suspect that the bamboo does capture rain in the leaves and mosquitos love it or so some people say. Others say that is a myth. I had an awful mosquito problem and I had a lot of bamboo in the neighborhood. I also had a river not far away and a dry creek bed with wallows.. I read somewhere that it was the bamboo that attracted them but I have also read the opposite.....See MoreOrganizing vs. churning
Comments (8)Frankie, I have just written 2 posts and deleted them, because I am so full of what I've just learnt. Originally, I came on here to respond to your post, and give some advice about de-cluttering, then I learnt something as I wrote, and deleted that post. So I wrote another one, and learnt something else, and whew... I have had a major "aha" moment. I was going to tell you I didn't exactly know what you meant by "churning", that organizing is simply a matter of keeping only what you love and use, and getting the rest out of your home. But even while I was typing I realised that I do know exactly what churning is. I even use the term a lot, because that is how I worry. I churn in my mind. I churn over my thougts. I'm a stressor and a worrier to the point that if I haven't got anything to worry about I'll worry about someone else's worries for them! LOL. DH is not a worrier, thankfully for my sake, and often tells me to "Stop worrying!", So last week I sat up in bed and said, "Ok I want to, but HOW do I do it". His answer, "Just stop thinking about it.". So I gave a sigh and said, "But HOW? No one says HOW to stop the thoughts." "You just do it, don't think of them anymore, put them out" he says. Right! And then as I wrote to you, it clicked with me. I have successfully de-cluttered and organized our home, and it's a peaceful calm haven that we love to come home to. I no longer churn when it comes to the house, so I DO know how to stop churning my thoughts. Exactly the same principle. I've read Flyladies "De-clutter your body", and even then it didn't actually click. I understood the principle, but didn't know how to "do" it. Just the same as when I read of people who have trouble getting rid of stuff from their homes, I think "Huh? it's obvious isn't it, you just take it away somewhere else or you trash it, what's the problem". Well, I see now why people get stuck, because I get stuck with my own thoughts. Well, I'm trying not to write such long posts, so I'll just say that I'm going to give my mind the same treatment I gave my house. Ask each thought, Do I love you, do I need you? Are you still there because someone gave you to me? Am I hanging onto you because you might fit in the future? Am I hanging onto you because you fit me in the past? Oh, I could go on and on with this. Now tell me, where do you trash junky thoughts to? I recognize all the "stuff" now, but I have to take the steps in getting them out of my mind. Frankie, thank you for your post. It helped it all to finally "click" for me....See MoreSpider plant vs Mother-in-Law's Tongue: Day vs Night
Comments (26)MsGreenFinger GW(8 Ireland) I didn't base my post on scientific research. But I did look up articles about 'air purifying plants based on a NASA research' which are actually the most common house plants. (Palm, spider plant, Sans., english ivy, peace lily, boston fern etc) Maybe it does matter what kind of plant one has, how many, what size and how fast they grow. But I am sure, having a dozen large specimens in your home will make the air quality better, just as they make the life quality better. You also can read this interesting aticle: Can House Plants Solve IAQ Problems? The idea of common plants solving IAQ problems is attractive. Most people like having plants in their homes and offices and in the hotels, stores, and public buildings they visit. However, important questions exist as to whether plants can actually affect indoor air sufficiently to warrant their use as air cleaners. Can House Plants Solve IAQ Problems-2.pdf (PDF document 38Kb) This is from this article: To date, advocates have not reported the results from actual field tests. One field study was begun and failed, according to a strong advocate of the interiorscape approach to IAQ control. Stuart Snyder is the president of Aqua/Trends of Boca Raton, Florida, a firm that sells irrigation systems for interiorscapes. He offered his explanation as part of a 13-page letter to Robert Axelrad, Director of EPA's Indoor Air Division. Responding to what he calls EPA's criticism of the NASA work, Snyder wrote, “In many ways small systems are better able to isolate factors, and more clearly define mechanisms at work.... Larger environments are too subject to conflicting variables. Real life, field studies with their complex dynamics are also valuable, and should be implemented at later stages of research -- they are however, more difficult to accurately stage and evaluate” Snyder continued, “Scaled up studies must be made at some point. Associated Landscape Contractors of America have already attempted a controlled study in an office building. It failed as a study because of these difficulties.” The office-building study was done for over a year under realistic conditions and with as much control as can be achieved in a field study, There was no indication that the presence of plants had any measurable effect. HBI Inc., which conducted the study, reported virtually no effect of plants on the VOC concentrations. John R. Girman (Chief of the Analysis Branch at EPA's Indoor Air Division) has prepared a memo that details some shortcomings of the NASA study's claims for the efficacy of plants. The memo was included in correspondence between Axelrad and Snyder. Girman's memo responds to some of the technical issues presented by Snyder and other advocates of IAQ control with house plants. The memo's title is “Comment on the Use of Plants as a Means to Control Indoor Air Pollution,” (undated.) Girman analyzes the notion that NASA research shows plants are effective at removing indoor air pollutants at realistic concentrations and time frames. He calculates that at the most favorable conditions, it would take 680 plants in a typical house to achieve the same pollutant removal rate Wolverton and his colleagues reported they achieved in the test chamber. However, scale-up considerations are also important. It appears that the average chamber volume used in Wolverton's tests was 0.5 m3. This means the results must be appropriately scaled-up for use in a larger environment to allow for differences in volumetric loading (the number of plants per volume of space). This does not appear to have been done. The volume of a typical house in the U.S. is 340 m3 with a floor area of 139 m2 (1500 ft2). Thus, the recommendation that one plant be used per 100 ft2 implies the use of 15 plants in a typical house. [ALCA recommends 1 plant per 100 ft2. Wolverton recently told us he now recommends 2 or 3 plants/100 ft2, but he says “he is “just throwing a dart."] This would provide for 340 m3/15 plants or 23 m3 per plant, not 0.5 m3 per plant as in the chamber. This means that each plant would have to clean 46 times more volume than it did in the test chamber or, as would actually happen, it will clean the larger volume less effectively. To be more precise, each plant will have a pollutant removal rate which is only 1/46 of the rate it would have in the chamber, i.e., only 0.002 h-1. Thus, plants at the volumetric loading recommended would be expected to contribute relatively little to pollutant removal in any indoor environment with typical ventilation To achieve the same pollutant removal rate as realized in the test chamber, one would need to have the same volumetric loading, i.e., 680 plants in a typical house (340 m3 divided by 0.5 m3 per plant). This does not seem practical and this forms the basis for concern that adequate and realistic scale-up considerations are necessary before the use of plants can be recommended as a means to control IAQ. Similar concerns apply to the use of plants to control IAQ in office environments. It is hardly surprising that the attempt to validate the test chamber results by Associated Landscape Contractors of America did not provide measurable success ellenr22 - NJ - Zone 6b/7a(6b/7a) another option would be to not pollute the earth, the air. I agree with you but people need to vote for the right people in the elections to do that....See Morerusty_blackhaw
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agodeeje
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agoironbelly1
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agoBrent_In_NoVA
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agomaro
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agoironbelly1
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agoinkognito
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agorusty_blackhaw
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agomaro
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agogardengal48 (PNW Z8/9)
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agonandina
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agoinkognito
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agoironbelly1
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agoinkognito
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agomadtripper
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agoinkognito
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agoCathy_in_PA
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agoironbelly1
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agorusty_blackhaw
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agokarinl
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agoironbelly1
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agoinkognito
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agonandina
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agolaag
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agomaro
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agoinkognito
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agoCathy_in_PA
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agolaag
17 years agolast modified: 9 years agoironbelly1
17 years agolast modified: 9 years ago
Related Stories
LANDSCAPE DESIGN15 Great Ideas for a Lawn-Free Yard
End the turf war for good with hardscaping, native grasses and ground covers that save water and are easier to maintain
Full StoryLANDSCAPE DESIGNRecipe for Modernist Edible Garden Style
Herbs, vegetables and fruit trees aren’t just for traditional gardens. Here’s how to design them into modernist landscapes
Full StoryMOST POPULARWhat to Know About Adding a Deck
Want to increase your living space outside? Learn the requirements, costs and other considerations for building a deck
Full StoryMOST POPULARMeet a Lawn Alternative That Works Wonders
Carex can replace turfgrass in any spot, is low maintenance and adjusts easily. Add its good looks and you’ve got a ground cover winner
Full StoryGARDENING GUIDESHow to Design a Garden That Lasts
Climates are changing. Wildlife is evolving. Can your garden keep up?
Full StoryHOME TECHIs the Timing Finally Right for Framed Digital Art?
Several companies are preparing to release digital screens and apps that let you stream artworks and video on your wall
Full StoryGREAT HOME PROJECTSHow to Create a Secret Doorway Behind a Bookcase
Hide your valuables (or unsightly necessities) in a room or nook that no one will guess is there
Full StoryKITCHEN COUNTERTOPSKitchen Counters: Concrete, the Nearly Indestructible Option
Infinitely customizable and with an amazingly long life span, concrete countertops are an excellent option for any kitchen
Full StoryRUGSPrevent Slips and Floor Damage With the Right Rug Pad
Here's what to know about sizes, materials, costs and maintenance of this important companion to your area rugs
Full StoryCONTEMPORARY HOMESHouzz Tour: From Anonymous to Outstanding in Georgia
With a striking front porch and a dynamic wood ribbon inside, this Decatur home moves ahead of the curve
Full Story
catkim