Carry-On Discussion
8 months ago
Featured Answer
Sort by:Oldest
Comments (42)
- 8 months ago
- 8 months ago
Related Discussions
The Painted Veil - A Discussion
Comments (3)The speech you paraphrase, Suzanne--"Why do we expect people to have the qualities that they do not possess?" --also struck me as significant in terms of our assumptions about other people. I also celebrated the themes of forgiveness and understanding that people are not what we make of them but what they inherently are. It's the basis of most marriages, at least mine, so that felt real to me. We would never have survived to 50+ years if we had not abandoned some of those early illusions. I didn't think Kitty languished too long at all--she had been badly used all around by her parents who were eager to marry her off to the first available suitor, by her lover and his eagerness to dump her, and even by her husband, who never really looked at her and certainly was more involved in his work than in satisfying his wife either sexually or emotionally. That scene where they are sitting in the rain by the side of the road lingers in my mind as a paradigm of his whole punishing relationship with her when she wasn't what he wanted. In fact, I thought her turn to helping at the orphanage was rather abrupt. Diana Rigg was awesome as the nun, I thought, and I saw her advice to Kitty to return to the West as very wise. I agree that Kitty had finally found useful work but she is not really a creature of that place. I thought the prospect of the child invited the nun to send this now-awakened women back to a world where she might actually make a cultural difference. I can't recall the name of the actor who played the neighbor, but the interludes with him, his subtle wisdom and "going native" pleasure in opium and sex, were very revealing, at least to me, of how long-term colonizers can never really return to the stratified assumptions of the world they left. That night where they got super-drugged out and finally accepted their mutual desire was so beautifully done, almost choreographed. Whether it is "true" to the book or not, it worked for me--a product of my own time and place--in a way that might not have worked for Kitty's time, when women who kicked over any kind of traces were punished. This wasn't long after the 19th -century Cult of True Womanhood bound women to purity, piety, domesticity, and passivity and a belief system that Edward seemed to be immured in. After all, she accepted the need to "marry for a living" without too much questions, even if she knew she was a commodity on the marriagel market and had profoundly limited choices. Andie, I know you are already slightly put off by the film because it doesn't follow Maugham's script. I have not read the Maugham story, but the few pieces I have read lead to think of him as the ultimate cynic when it comes to male-female relationships. A less "happy" (and I qualify that term) ending would have been just as satisfying as the ending of the film. I felt it was poignant, and a reminder that just because we "wake up" to reality life still isn't just a glass of lemonade....See MoreEarthworms Discussion
Comments (18)Great link, David. And a good read. David, you may not have take the time to read all the novels in the thread and I can't blame you, but the University of Minn relies on the exact same research I've been talking about being the core of all of this so pasting anything from them is just essentially repeating what joepyeweed linked and also supports my claim that there isn't that much study out there supporting the work I question. Only many sites repeating the same source. Note that your other info (pasted, not the link) is very reliant on such words as "presumably" and "may". In other words, reliant on assumptions made and thus can't be presented as fact because it isn't one. Of course, they are much more able to admit this than the UofM group, it seems. I read the whole article, but I read it fast. So if I got something wrong here, please correct me: 1) The author readily admitted that the experiment used adult worms while in the natural site there were primarily hatchlings. I'm guessing on this, but I have a feeling there is a reason they didn't find many adults and it might have something to do with a reduced lifespan in colder climates. This leads to longer incubation periods of the cocoon and so the adult feeders aren't around that long. Using adult worms essentially nullifies the experiment because the adults have at least a month of voracious feeding that the hatchlings won't have. Hardly replication of nature. 2) It is mentioned that the growth of plants increased. Not decreased because of the worms changing the environment. 3) It is mentioned that the most pronounced change in microbial composition was caused by "Time". Not worms. And if the correct age of worms were used in the first place I imagine the rate of change caused by worms would have been even less. It mentioned that water was next in affecting microbial change and that water also affected the rate at which worms could make any changes. Kind of stands to reason that the amount of climate change we have experienced the last 30 years could have more to do with the soil issues than the claims of UofM that its the evil invasive earthworm. The earthworm is simply showing an ability to withstand climate change better in comparison to many of the other life forms in the soil. Not to mention (actually I already did earlier) the chemical changes in rain due to pollution. pH of water greatly affects microbes and worms are much more resilient than many microbes to these changes. Just because there are now more worms in one spot and less microbes doesn't mean that the worms are the culprits. It could also mean that the worms are simply surviving changes that microbes can't and taking advantage of any changes they might have the means to take advantage of. This study actually takes other variables into consideration and admits shortcomings. It's a REAL study that presents real findings from what appears to be an objective standpoint rather than an "I need to make a name" standpoint. Joepyeweed, the heliocentric theory is also one that was refuted for quite some time even though there is a ton more evidence supporting it. Mathematical evidence. But, it is important to note that we all take this as FACT because we think it makes sense. Not because we all understand the mathematical evidence. Why is that important? Because at one time the other theory, geocentricity, made sense to everyone because those in authority told them it does. And when it was challenged with heliocentricity everyone ridiculed those that challenged geocentricity and many people died supporting the use of reason to refute the accepted "scientific" claims. Just like the global warming example I used (except for the killing the opposition part). Thanks for your support in pointing out that just because scientists make claims, it doesn't make it fact and using reason can punch holes in unreasonable claims that don't take all evidence into account. What example is next, the round earth? I'll head you off at the pass. Scientists laughed at the square earth theory based in the Bible, which mentions the corners of the earth several times. Obviously it's a flat round disc! It leaves a round shadow on the moon. But wait! It's a sphere! No it's not, the authorities say it can't be because the bible says the earth sits on four pillars and has edges! It took quite some time for people to use reason to refute what authorities on subjects wanted us to believe in order to uphold reputations and control. And don't try to tell me those people were less intelligent. Ancient peoples were able to survive in environments most of us would die in because they were much better thinkers. Yet, they were able to fall for "an authority says it, it must be true"....See MoreStressed States Weigh Ending Medicaid
Comments (1)This is a shame because all they really have to do is cut out the more extravagant stuff at the top. No more transplants, sexual reassignments, etc. All the stuff so many people howl about as being "rights". Our technology is waaaay out in front of our philosophy and clearly beyond our ability to pay. Call it "rationing" or whatever you want. There isn't enough money on earth or in heaven to pay for what everybody demands. Tough choices. They need to be made....See MoreDiscussion: Angle of Repose
Comments (78)Hello, Woodnymph! I was alerted to your message by someone who lurks at HT. I have nothing to add to this discussion; it's pretty complete. I loved AOR for three reasons. First, it was a fascinating family history, tragic indeed but it rang true emotionally. Second, his link to the New England Transcendentalists intrigued me, as I had read nothing more about them since Emerson, in high school. And most of all, his description of the West is nonpareil, especially for those of us who live here and have traveled throughout the region. Whether it's the desert or the Sierra Nevadas or the Montana sky, Stegner makes it sing! Did you know that he's also a well-regarded historian? I have his book "The Gathering of Zion: The Story of the Mormon Trail" in my TBR pile, and am thinking of reading it next. He would tell that story with no glossing over the blemishes, but with much sympathy....See More- 8 months ago
- 8 months ago
- 8 months ago
- 8 months agolast modified: 8 months ago
- 8 months ago
- 8 months ago
- 8 months ago
- 8 months ago
- 8 months ago
- 8 months ago
- 8 months agolast modified: 8 months ago
- 8 months ago
- 8 months ago
- 8 months ago
- 8 months agolast modified: 8 months ago
- 8 months agolast modified: 8 months ago
- 8 months ago
- 8 months agolast modified: 8 months ago
- 8 months ago
- 8 months agolast modified: 8 months ago
- 8 months agolast modified: 8 months ago
- 8 months ago
- 8 months agolast modified: 8 months ago
- 8 months ago
- 8 months ago
- 8 months ago
- 8 months agolast modified: 8 months ago
- 8 months ago
- 8 months ago
- 8 months agolast modified: 8 months ago
- 8 months ago
- 8 months agolast modified: 8 months ago
- 8 months ago
- 8 months ago
- 8 months ago
- 8 months ago
- 8 months agolast modified: 8 months ago
- 8 months ago
- 8 months agolast modified: 8 months ago
Related Stories

CONTRACTOR TIPS10 Things to Discuss With Your Contractor Before Work Starts
Have a meeting a week before hammers and shovels fly to make sure everyone’s on the same page
Full Story
DECORATING GUIDES10 Popular Design Trends to Carry Into the New Year
A designer shares the looks that are likely to stay in style in 2016 and beyond
Full Story
DECLUTTERINGA Pro Weighs In on Decluttering the KonMari Way
As Marie Kondo’s Netflix series sparks an organizing blitz, an expert discusses the practicality of 7 KonMari principles
Full Story
VALENTINE’S DAYThe Real Importance of Valentine’s Day
Even small traditions celebrating love can carry through an entire life
Full Story
TRANSITIONAL HOMESHouzz Tour: Classic American Bungalow Style for a Bachelor
For this homeowner’s first house, a designer creates a clean, neutral look with pieces he can carry into the future
Full Story
FEEL-GOOD HOMESimple Pleasures: Get Cozy on a Cold Day
Some things are best when the weather is bad. Heat up some cocoa and join the discussion
Full Story
REMODELING GUIDESCool Your House (and Costs) With the Right Insulation
Insulation offers one of the best paybacks on your investment in your house. Here are some types to discuss with your contractor
Full Story
LATEST NEWS FOR PROFESSIONALSWhat Types of Insurance You Need During the Pandemic
In this webinar, insurance expert Steve Coviello discusses the best policies to protect your business and employees
Full Story0

KITCHEN ISLANDS8 Blue Paint Colors to Consider for a Kitchen Island
Discuss these appealing shades with your kitchen pro to see which one might be right for you
Full Story
LIVING ROOMSNew This Week: 6 Fresh Family Rooms That Feature a TV
Design pros discuss how they handled colors, materials and TV placement to create stylish entertaining spaces
Full Story

roxsolid