It certainly does not look like it!! And that would 'Pendula Bruns' (must be a spellcheck thingy :-))

There is one I have simply called ’Bruns’. Yours looks similar to what mine looked like at that stage.

tj

Here’s an old post with most pix still viewable.,,

https://www.gardenweb.com/discussions/1850854/picea-omorika-bruns-or-pendula-bruns#n=24

tj

gal - WHAT ?

tj , and who made the best pix ?

ron

Not sure what you mean, Ron.

tj

plantkiller, in your original posting, the plant name was misspelled. It has since been corrected.

Whatever cultivar it is, it's a great looking tree!

I too purchased a ‘pendula bruns‘ from Mr. Stanley about 3-4 years ago and it looks similar to the one in question here. I’ve been wondering what mine was for a while.

gal , I was just messing with you . Thank you for correction

tj , great link ,,, I thought it was you that put the Good pic of 'Bruns in that post

it was coniferjoy

ron

and by good , I mean the one shown at same age as mine..your pic was very nice

yes Al , it is great ,,unfortunately the space allowed is iffy for 'Pendula Bruns

if it is 'Bruns , I will have to move it

I am going to ask the folks a CK to weigh in ( Larry works there now

Jacob , let's see pic

ron

here is a pic from CK

a little smaller than mine , but you can see the weeping start

Here is reply from Sam from CK

" It could be Bruns, but Larry did note that there were rows of them that did not show a strict weeping habit until they reached 8-9' in height..

Sorry this isn't a super definitive answer, but it's the most specific we can be "

This is mine

thanks guys .

The description on ACS site says 'Bruns grows6-8 in.

'Pendula Bruns grows 12 -18 in.

just sayen

My ’Bruns’ had quite variable annual growth over its first ten years. Some years only six inches but one year it shot up 18 inches. It is regularly 8-10 inches now.

tj

I was afraid of that ,,,

growth rate is not always a 100% discripter ......that's a word , isn't it

I should probably move it anyhow

ron