Houzz Logo Print
editoria

Horse Racing and Love (of money)

7 years ago

I didn't want to disrupt Anglophilia's thread about the Kentucky Derby, but I couldn't disagree more with something she said:

(a retired veterinarian) said there are no people more concerned that those IN the industry. No one wants horses to die or be injured. One does not work in this industry without a great love for these magnificent animals. The various race tracks spend a fortune to make their tracks safe for the horses and pleasant for those who go to the races.

The first sentence sounds ridiculous to me. No people more concerned? Try Googling horse racing deaths and see what you get: organizations and websites devoted to fighting the cruelty and resulting injuries and deaths that permeate horse racing.

Those in the horse racing industry have a great love for these magnificent animals? Then why do they race them? Whip them? Force them to go faster and faster? Replace them when they break their legs and are killed? It's not a love of horses that drives the racing industry; it's a love of money. It's all about the winnings. Simple greed.

Race tracks spend a fortune to make their tracks safe for the horses? Not safe enough--not by a long shot. TIME magazine reported that 493 horses died last year from race injuries (or euthanization following a race injury). That's about 10 horses per week. It reported 6,134 horse deaths over the past 10 years, not including deaths from training.

My family used to have horses, and although we were never even remotely involved with racing we became acquainted with some who were. Not one of them impressed me as honest, ethical or devoted to their horses. Quite the opposite. There's a reason the term "horse trader" has a sleazy connotation.

The NY Times posed a question about horse racing: "Is the sport obsolete?" I think it should be banned. I wouldn't even call it a sport.

Comments (35)