Architect Dilemma
Marcy
5 years ago
Featured Answer
Sort by:Oldest
Comments (25)
User
5 years agolast modified: 5 years agoUser
5 years agoRelated Discussions
Architect Model Help
Comments (17)Here is the law in the State of Michigan Sec. 2014. - A person is subject to the penalties set forth in article 6 who commits 1 of the following: (a) Uses the term "architect", "professional engineer", "land surveyor", "professional surveyor", or a similar term in connection with the person's name unless the person is licensed in the appropriate practice under this article. (b) Presents or attempts to use as the person's own the license or seal of another. (c) Attempts to use an expired, suspended, or revoked license. (d) Uses the words "architecture", "professional engineering", "land surveying", "professional surveying", or a similar term in a firm name without authorization by the appropriate board. (e) Submits to a public official of this state or a political subdivision of this state for approval, a permit or a plan for filing as a public record, a specification, a report, or a land survey that does not bear 1 or more seals of a licensee as required by this article. This subdivision does not apply to a public work costing less than $15,000.00 or a residential building containing not more than 3,500 square feet of calculated floor area. As used in this subdivision, "calculated floor area" means that term as defined in section 2012(2)(a). What this means is that an unlicensed designer (who is not a member of an architectural firm) cannot design a house with more than 3,500 s.f of habitable area (gross area but doesn't include bathrooms, halls or storage rooms). That person also cannot use the term "architect" or any similar term ("architectural" is obviously similar) before of after their name. That person also cannot use the term "architecture" or any similar term ("architectural" is obviously similar) as part of their company name. The use of the terms "architect designer" to describe herself and "Architectural and Interior Design Services" to describe her company is clearly prohibited in the State of Michigan (as it is in the 8 states where I have practiced). I don't see how this person can give you much of an argument about letting you have the model. Just play dumb and tell her you are going to ask the State Board of Registration if an "architectural designer" can refuse to let a client have a model. I think she will bring the model over within the hour with some flowers and perhaps a ham. If she doesn't, file a complaint and let justice prevail. Here is a link that might be useful: complaint form...See MoreWhich architect to choose?
Comments (15)A liitle off the OP's question but to expand on nanj's comments above, this is why I like to get a builder on board as part of the team from the start. As a matter of fact I can't remember the last time I did a competitive bid project, they've all been negotiated. I know costs fairly well but I don't pretend it's better knowledge base than a builders (and as a sidebar, the reverse is true, a builder should not pretend to know design better than a creative designer, yet many do exactly that and many owners buy into it!). And the reasons are: -It's all well and good to say "Let's get bids!!!" but rarely are all bids equal. One guy's quote has window brand "X" even though the plans say "Y" because "These guys give much better service", another guy looks at the plans and starts suggesting cost saving measures which are incorporated into his bid, etc. -It forces the owner to make a boatload of decisions up front often resulting in "decision overload" which very likely means changes later, the "bid" documents notwithstanding. -Folks, we're building a custom home here, not a 7-11, and as a result there's a high level of emotion and therefore changes, both up AND down, ALL of which will be negotiated with the builder on a non-competitive basis. A negotiated price is based on trust and the critical element of trust better exist in the relationship for it to be a happy one so why not address the "trust" factor from the start, get that out of the way, and take advantage of the builders cost expertise from the very beginning? -And speaking of trust and compatibility, we're not buying a car here where the relationship with the salesman lasts a couple of hours, we're building a custom home where the owner and the builder are going to be joined at the hip for the better part of a year, maybe longer. It's fine to interview builders for an hour or two in a competitive bid scenario but that vetting doesn't compare to being involved with a personality throughout the entire design process. -As many of you know, I do most of my conceptual design work in a "real time" format with the owner as an active participant. I've found that the builders often have some great ideas during these sessions too and I like them there for that alone and of course for the cost expertise while we're drawing fanciful lines on paper. -And finally, "bids" tend to promote decision making that is 100% price based, really not much different thinking than when going to the food store that sells cereal the cheapest. With that said let me close by citing a quote by John Ruskin, an economist and a bunch of other things, on price vs. quality. He calls it "The Common Law of Business Balance": “There is hardly anything in the world that someone cannot make a little worse and sell a little cheaper, and the people who consider price alone are that person’s lawful prey. It’s unwise to pay too much, but it’s worse to pay too little. When you pay too much, you lose a little money — that is all. When you pay too little, you sometimes lose everything, because the thing you bought was incapable of doing the thing it was bought to do. The common law of business balance prohibits paying a little and getting a lot — it can’t be done. If you deal with the lowest bidder, it is well to add something for the risk you run, and if you do that you will have enough to pay for something better.”...See MoreHELP! Roof dilemma! Architect mistake!
Comments (36)@roccouple— yes you are exactly correct. That is a staircase and that’s why the headers don’t align. We also can’t move that bottom staircase window... because it’s as far down as it can go. They are “switchback” stairs and there is a landing in between those windows. I asked about one long window there— but the landing would be then be visible. But, we decided to do exactly what you said... that top window with the flap will move down about 2 ft or so. Then another window will go on that right side to be even with that one. We will move the last window on the house to be even with the lower staircase window. That should help with symmetry also. .... and after doing that— if we need to— we will move that upper center window (either up or down).. not sure until we see the other stuff. Thanks for your advice! Greatly appreciated....See MorePlan design dilemma
Comments (55)@cpartist exactly what you said really bothered me - even if she was willing to "redraw" a plan online, (which is what she did even when I told her it wasn't exactly what I wanted), I would have bought the rights anyway because I'm a rule follower and this has just driven me crazy! I'm sure it's done all the time but still... I triple checked her credentials but we were definitely getting the "draftsman" experience. The builder has a (very talented, might I add, based on her work I've seen) interior designer on staff too as the selections coordinator - guess I need to clarify those expectations, does she actually help with selections or just write down what I want - ha!...See MoreMarcy
5 years agoUser
5 years agoUser
5 years agolast modified: 5 years agocurlycook
5 years agoUser
5 years agoMarcy
5 years agoUser
5 years agolast modified: 5 years agoMarcy
5 years agocurlycook
5 years agoMarcy
5 years agoMarcy
5 years agoUser
5 years agocurlycook
5 years agoUser
5 years agolast modified: 5 years agoUser
5 years agolast modified: 5 years agocurlycook
5 years agoMarcy
5 years agoMarcy
5 years agocurlycook
5 years agoMarcy
5 years agoMarcy
5 years agoCharles Ross Homes
5 years ago
Related Stories
HOME TECHDesign Dilemma: Where to Put the Flat-Screen TV?
TV Placement: How to Get the Focus Off Your Technology and Back On Design
Full StoryDECORATING GUIDES7 Common Design Dilemmas Solved!
Here’s how to transform the awkward areas of your home into some of its best features
Full StoryREMODELING GUIDESDesign Dilemma: How Do I Modernize My Cedar Walls?
8 Ways to Give Wood Walls a More Contemporary Look
Full StoryREMODELING GUIDESHave a Design Dilemma? Talk Amongst Yourselves
Solve challenges by getting feedback from Houzz’s community of design lovers and professionals. Here’s how
Full StoryWORKING WITH PROSHow to Hire the Right Architect
Your perfect match is out there. Here’s how to find good candidates — and what to ask at that first interview
Full StoryREMODELING GUIDESArchitect's Toolbox — Trim Wraps Up Style for Rooms
Dynamic 'ribbons' of trim work wonders to provide that important finishing touch and set off your room's architecture
Full StoryHOUZZ TOURSMy Houzz: An Austin Architect's Hip, Modern Home
A Texas architect designs a midcentury-inspired, indoor-outdoor living space for ease, flow and utility
Full StoryREMODELING GUIDESSee What You Can Learn From a Floor Plan
Floor plans are invaluable in designing a home, but they can leave regular homeowners flummoxed. Here's help
Full StoryWORKING WITH PROSYour Guide to a Smooth-Running Construction Project
Find out how to save time, money and your sanity when building new or remodeling
Full Story
curlycook