yellowwood and amur maakii
Marie Tulin
8 years ago
last modified: 8 years ago
Featured Answer
Sort by:Oldest
Comments (24)
waynedanielson
8 years agoEmbothrium
8 years agolast modified: 8 years agoRelated Discussions
Tree recommendations needed
Comments (6)From the list you present above and the proposed size of the lot, there would be a problem with many of these trees. The lot sounds like it may be in the 45ft wide and or deep size as you describe. With respect to your tree list, here is what we have; Beeches get huge and take forveer to get there . You would be planting a shade tree that would outgrow the lot but also would be a shade tree for their children or grand children. Ginkos do not give the best of shade, but they are a great tree to have. The Katsura tree is a good possibility. Try to find "Heronwood" or a similiar Katsura. They have rubbery leaves and offer decent shade and grow quite fast in their early years. The Kentucky Coffee Tree is a very large tree at maturity and can be 60 or 70 feet high and quite wide as well. Lindens are very large trees for this lot. Serviceberries are not great shade trees either as they can be tall and thin. Great flowers in the spring and that is about it. I will let other folks comment on the remaining trees on the list but consider the Katsura. They are a fine tree and great looking as well. There are some magnolias that would fit in this spot. In Wisconcin, "Dr. Merrill" or "White Stardust" are great shade trees with a tremendous bloom in the spring. They both have very large leaves and would fit in this area. There are some Hawthornes that would fit this need as well. "Winterking", "Crusader", or "Washington" get to a size to offer good shade and are very interesting trees. Good luck....See MoreTrees which do not get enough respect for their fall color?
Comments (44)Not a tree, but I love the fall color of Viburnum lantanoides. In cooler climates, they start to change by the end of august, turning pink, then burgundy, then yellow, then brown by the end of summer. Restore, I live in Central Indiana also - Yes, the usual clay soil is a bit of a pain, but the alluvial floodplain soils are a pleasure to garden in. A fairly large creek goes across our property, and it floods a bit every year, depositing more rich, black silt. Most trees grow excellently. The forest is mostly elms, ash, and hackberry - Some sugar maple, tons of basswood. The soil never dries out completely - I'm afraid I've kind of neglected the claybound front yard and put all my effort into the floodplain!...See MoreIdeas for new parkway trees
Comments (11)I believe the OP already noted in the first post that these were trees the city allowed :-) There are a few I'd eliminate immediately: Callery pear - no redeeming value whatsoever Liquidambar (or any other species with excessive surface roots....like most of the maples) Ilex opaca - messy and with unfriendly foliage Cherries - surface roots as well as prone to suckering And FWIW, I think the canopy level of the Amelanchiers might be lower than desirable but that depends on the specific tree selection and training. IME, these do not "limb up" well :-) I'd also limit anything that tended to produce any fruit or excess litter (like seed pods, buckeyes, etc.) The elms, nyssa, oxydendrum and lindens are very tough trees and typically able to tolerate urban plantings, pollution, various soil conditions and drought well. I should think any of these would be good choices. I am not as familiar with some of the other choices....See MoreShould I stay or should I go?
Comments (16)maackia(Zone 4): If you are really putting this up to a vote, my vote is to keep it. But then, I prefer the "wooded look" to the "formal" look. I go for the majesty of a big old tree rather then something exotic with perfect form. If you decide to take it down later, you can always do it later. Only reason I can see to do otherwise is of you need to clear the space to plant a replacement, or if the tree looks much worse in person. davidrt28 (zone 7): Didn't notice your question. White pine look amazing in the woods up here. I've seen great looking rows of old white pine along the property lines of old farms and parks. Young white pine look great in suburbs. Old ones in suburbs can be problematic. In the woods they kind of screen each other from the wind, and no one much cares if they drop branches. In the open they are more vulnerable to wind, and people freak out if a tree near the house drops branches. A white pine grown in the open can go through an "ugly duckling" phase while they decide whether they really need to lose those lower branches (as they would in the woods) when they have all that light. The transition from the perfect Christmas tree to the majestic limbed up forest giant can look homely if you have to see it out your kitchen window every day. Also they are just too big for most suburban lots....See MoreHuggorm
8 years agolast modified: 8 years agolucky_p
8 years agoMarie Tulin
8 years agolast modified: 8 years agoEmbothrium
8 years agowaynedanielson
8 years agoMarie Tulin
8 years agolucky_p
8 years agoMarie Tulin
8 years agowhaas_5a
8 years agoMarie Tulin
8 years agoSelect Landscapes of Iowa
8 years agomaackia
8 years agoMarie Tulin
8 years agowhaas_5a
8 years agoNevermore44 - 6a
8 years agowhaas_5a
8 years agoMarie Tulin
8 years agoNevermore44 - 6a
8 years agopennlake
8 years agoedlincoln
8 years agolast modified: 8 years agoterrene
8 years agolast modified: 8 years ago
terrene