The X Chromosome - genealogy related
11 years ago
Featured Answer
Sort by:Oldest
Comments (16)
- 11 years ago
- 11 years ago
Related Discussions
Pseudolarix x kampferi (amabilis) -- Golden Larch
Comments (19)Interesting question from above: "Why didnt the guy name it: Dax x kampferi?" To avoid confusing it for a Larch when it is not. Additional info: "Interestingly (Douglas Fir) this species (has) 13 pairs of chromosomes, which is one more pair than in all the other species in the genus. All the other members of the pine family also have only twelve pairs, except for Pseudolarix which has eleven pairs. (pg.196) Pseudolarix Gordon Pinaceae This genus of a single species has deciduous leaves as in the larches but the cones differ in that they break up at matruity to release the seeds. (pg.195)" Rushforth, Keith ÂConifers (1987); First published in the United States in 1987 by Facts On File, Inc., 460 Park Avenue South, New York, New York 10016; ISBN: 0-8160-1735-2. It's the cones again..... ------------------------------------------------------- Now I have a few questions of my own for Resin or anyone: What if the cones are big-time 'similar' but (hypothetically) the other traits pretty much are not present? This chromosome principle above, what is the significance of one less or one more pairing? Is there any significance... This is way beyond me. . . Thanks a lot, Dax...See MoreGenealogy
Comments (24)Old Fixer, although I use the FamilySearch.org web site, and have also used the LDS Family History Library as well as a local Family History Center, I do not have a tree uploaded to their web site. So, I cannot say whether or not "just anyone" can edit information on a tree that is on their site. I will look into that, though. I do know with certainty, however, that if you have a tree on Ancestry.com, you can mark it as Private. No one can see info that is on the tree unless you send them an invitation to see it. If you add photos or images of documents, etc., to a Private tree, small thumbnails will show up when other people do a search on a name, but if anyone clicks on the thumbnail to see a larger version, they will get an error message that the tree is private. You can also have a tree on Ancestry.com that is marked as Public. When a tree is Public, anyone can see information/photos, etc., for anyone who is deceased, or presumed to be deceased (e.g., they were born in 1884 and you don't have a death date, but it's easy to see that the person would not still be alive - they'd be 130 years old this year). If the person is still living, or presumed to still be living, all anyone can see is a shadow profile of either a male's head or a female's head. For the name it would say Living Fixer, so no one can even tell what the person's first name is (this example uses "Fixer" as the surname). And, even if a tree is marked Public, no one can change anything on it, unless you invite the person to be an editor. You can invite people to just view the tree (they would be invited with a "Guest" designation); or you can give them the ability to add to the tree (they would be invited with a "Contributor" designation); or you can invite them as an "Editor" with full ability to add/change/remove information/people. People who are invited as Guests and/or Contributors can be given the ability to view living persons, but that's not the default setting. You have to deliberately give them that ability. Anyone invited as an Editor automatically can see everything....See MoreGENEALOGY: William Scott Bailey
Comments (8)I have called ancestry many times and most of the time, its a reasonable wait and they are always helpful. My brick wall goes back to a John Boston - 1737-1810. He was a Major in the Revolutionary War in the Onslow Militia in NC. I was trying to make a connection to the infamous Henry Boston from the Eastern Shore of MD/VA in the 1640's. There is a hugh book written on his family and descendants. I even tracked one of them down and my husband and he did Y chromosome tests. No connection at all! And there is no connection to the other Boston lines on the Surname Projects done through Familytree DNA. We found a 4th cousin who goes back to the son of John, named James, as my husband does, and he agreed to be tested so we could determine if the line from there is solid and it is. Their results were a very good match. Turns out that there are a number of men with the surname of Burns, Byrne and Byrnes that are closer matches than any Bostons. And there are a couple with the surname of O'Neill and Reed or Reid that are even closer. All of these lines can be traced back to an area of Ireland called Leinster. Well, that's a surprise cause we thought the ancestors came from England or Scotland! So somewhere back either at John's generation or further back, we think a Boston male took in children sired by a man with one of those surnames. That wasn't uncommon at the time since women often lost husband's and men would marry women with children already. The issue here is that they took the Boston name and so now husband's family are Boston by name but not by blood - or at least not by any Boston line that has been documented. Those lines that have been are close to the area where John was, certainly within the realm of possibility for the scenario I proposed. We know that the line is good from James down as we have autosomal testing for cousins and they show up throughout the family tree. But through all this searching, I have located several descendants from the children of James 1767-1837. I have also found hand written documents where James wrote about each of his children, including hubs GGGF, who was given up at 10 days old to another family to raise (Kings) since his mother died. James wrote so lovingly about his wife and children. It was like my meeting him in person. I have so many questions I would love to ask him!...See MoreA (double) genealogy surprise
Comments (11)I have been working on my husband's father side of the family for over 2 years now. I have made some breakthroughs but also had some set backs. I was sure his GGGGGrandfather's line came from the infamous Henry Boston on the Eastern Shore of MD/VA. I even went so far as tracking down a living male proven descendant of Henry's (who, btw, still lives on the Eastern Shore) and he agreed to do Ydna testing,along with my husband. Results - not even closely related! And hubs isn't related to any of the other male Boston lines that have been tested, albeit only a few have been tested. But, I did find two 4th cousins of his that are also GGGGrandsons of James Boston 1767. One lives in NC and the other in GA. All three, hubs and the other 2, are on the same generation but from different sons of James. Interestingly enough, the other two are in a similiar situation as you Alisande. Camilla, the daughter of John (son of James) married her first cousin, John Wesley (son of Ira). One of the 4th cousins is from the line of Camilla and John Wesley and the other is from the brother of Camilla, John C. After I made contact with the fellow who is from John C.'s line, I was able to introduce him to his 4th cousin, who he didn't know about. How cool is that! So now hubs and I are planning a trip to Savannah to meet the cousin who lives in that area, where Ira, John, James and hubs line, George all lived. Turns out Ira and John owned thousands of acres along the Savannah River. (Our ancestor, George owned a little compared to them. Later on, we want to go to NC to meet the other cousin. Age wise the oldest is 77 in NC, so we need to make it a priority. He has sent me photos of relatives but we need to get better ones. Plus, he was the one who had hand written pages from James, father of Ira,. John and George that he donated to North Carolina Archives. How I would love to actually see those!...See More- 11 years ago
- 11 years ago
- 11 years ago
- 11 years ago
- 11 years ago
- 11 years agolast modified: 11 years ago
- 11 years ago
- 11 years ago
- 11 years ago
- 11 years ago
- 11 years ago
- 11 years ago
- 11 years ago
Related Stories

DECORATING PROJECTSWhat to Do With Old Family Photos
Find out how to research, share and preserve images that offer a connection to the past
Full Story
ARCHITECTUREWhat the Heck Is 'Good' Design Anyway?
We yearn for it and strive for it, but good home design isn't always easy to grasp. These 8 prescriptions from an architect can help
Full Story
STUDIOS AND WORKSHOPSHow to Set Up a Craft Room
Keep bits and bobs from winding their way into the rest of your home by setting up a designated area for craft projects
Full Story
LIFE10 Steps for Saying Goodbye to Sentimental Objects
Are keepsakes cluttering your space and your life? Consider this approach for letting go and moving on
Full Story
HEALTHY HOMEWhat You Need to Know About Dust and How to Fight It
Breathe easier with these 10 tips for busting mites, dander and other microscopic undesirables
Full Story
DECLUTTERING9 Exit Strategies for Your Clutter
How to efficiently — and regularly — rid your home of the things you don’t want
Full Story
MAN SPACESWhy Men Really Do Need a Cave
Don't dismiss cars, bars and the kegerator — a man space of some kind is important for emotional well-being at home
Full Story
ORGANIZING4 Questions to Help You Organize Your Favorite Photos
Organize your keeper photos with a system that's just right for you, whether it's in the cloud or you can hold it in your hand
Full Story
MOST POPULARBlast Decluttering Roadblocks Once and for All
Change your thinking to get the streamlined, organized home of your dreams
Full Story
LIFEEdit Your Photo Collection and Display It Best — a Designer's Advice
Learn why formal shots may make better album fodder, unexpected display spaces are sometimes spot-on and much more
Full StorySponsored


Alisande