Builder Error Caused Fire
drewou
9 years ago
Featured Answer
Sort by:Oldest
Comments (12)
kirkhall
9 years agodrewou
9 years agoRelated Discussions
Builder error on windows, help soon
Comments (10)PlyGem sells many different kinds of vinyl, vinyl clad and aluminum windows because it is the result of a NY private equity company, CI Capital Partners, taking over many different struggling window companies in 2004. They bought Nortek, MW Windows, CertainTeed Windows, Patriot Windows, Great Lakes Windows and Alenco Windows. Typical of this kind of leveraged buyout, costs were slashed by combining operations, closing facilities, eliminating about half of the work force and amassing a lot of debt. So, when you link to an all vinyl Pro Series Double-Hung Classic Double-Hung window once made by NW Windows, that's all I know about the window. These windows are sold primarily to builders so it is virtually impossible, even for an architect, to find out much about them. The fact that you don't know what kind of mullions are used means the builder has not been very forthcoming with you about the design of the house. It's time to get more information from your builder and ask him to let you participate more in the design. For instance, all window and door mullions should be drawn on the elevations and those drawings should be used by the builder, the local supplier, and the owner or an independent representative of the owner (like me) to check the order. I've never checked a window and door order that was entirely correct. I love that moment of silence when I tell a builder a sliding door opens the wrong way. Good luck....See Moremajor builder error
Comments (51)my husband is upset with me and said by asking for the cost it somehow implies we are willing to help pay for it and since the vaulted language is listed in the signed contract he wants the builder to pay the full cost In this case, your husband is wrong unless you agreed to something you haven't discussed here. I would advise the same thing. The most important thing is to move the builder away from the "it is too late to fix it" defense. So long as he answers your inquiries with some indication that it can't be fixed he will likely continue working on the house until it really can't be fixed. However, when you ask him for a price to correct the issue, you automatically move him off the "it is too late to fix it" defense. It also automatically creates a duty for him to mitigate the cost of correction by stopping additional work that would increase the cost to correct. Your stop work order does the same thing, but shifts responsibility for loss mitigation to you rather than the builder. Now you have a stoppage that you demanded and you have to act to limit his losses on the stoppage by making a decision quickly. Sure, there is a little bit of greasing the wheels by implying that you might pay for the correction, but that implication isn't a contract, nor is it going to overrule the existing contract and obligation. Really, you are strengthening your case, as you now have objective evidence of the cost to correct and thus have monetary damages that you are fighting over rather than professional judgment. ----------------------------------------- Having said all this, as several posters have mentioned above, you don't necessarily want the builder to pay for this. Remember your goal is to get the best house built for an amount that you find reasonable. It is not to win this fight with the builder. You and the builder have asymmetric information, simply put he knows more about building a house, and the costs associated with it, than you do. You want your builder to make a profit on your house, you don't want a situation where the builder is acting to mitigate his loss on your house. In the end, he can simply cut corners that you can't know or find in order to recover some of his losses. Remember, he just needs to make some profit on your build, you actually have to live in the house....See MoreDesign Error Causes $1300 mistake, Contractor is Asking Me to Pay
Comments (38)Sorry but every single one of us creating a kitchen redo tends to participate in the design process. We don't say to the designer, "surprise me". That has absolutely nothing to do with what I wrote. Mostly everyone is responsible for their own negligence, that is day one of torts. This idea that you pay a contractor, so he is the person ultimately responsible is bogus. What theory of law would make a contractor ultimately responsible for a subcontractor's negligence? There isn't one. However, what typically happens in these situations is that the general contractor contracts directly with the subs. Mistakes then go through the G.C. as you have standing with the G.C. and he has standing with the subs (although realistically you could argue around standing). Essentially the subs don't work for you, they work for the G.C., thus you go through the G.C. to get to the sub. Having said that, there are times when the G.C. has sufficiently passed his duty on to someone else. One of those times would be when you met with a design professional directly. The law isn't stupid, there is not going to be an expectation that a General Contractor be better at kitchen design than a kitchen designer. So knowing that the OP met with the designer, and that a reasonable person would believe that kitchen designers know more about kitchen design than G.C.'s do, what is the GC's duty? Because without a duty, he has no liability. Is it his duty to faithfully execute the design? Is it duty to catch and correct measurement errors? Is it his duty to redesign the kitchen to be more functional? The answer to those questions are yes, maybe, and no. ----- Let me clue all the legal hobbyists here into the real world. There are no answers before a case is adjudicated. There is simply the plaintiff argues... and the defense argues... Sometimes there are strong arguments, and sometimes there are weak arguments, but they don't pick the winners and losers at the start. Here are the elements of negligence... the existence of a legal duty that the defendant owed to the plaintiff defendant's breach of that duty plaintiff's sufferance of an injury proof that defendant's breach caused the injury Were I the builder I would argue that my duty was simply to execute the design arrived at by the client and the designer, checking only reasonableness of the cabinet design. I might win, I might lose, but it is a much better case than the designer has. The designer's only defense is that knowing an oven will interfere with a drawer is not something most designers would be able to foresee. Which wouldn't fly if you bought it a first class airline seat. Since the homeowner participated with the designer, you can go directly to the designer for recompense. ETA: I agree with cpartist that for a homeowner to "participate" in the design process does NOT make them responsible for errors in construction such as posted by OP. I agree with that too, but that is not what I said, or even close to it. I am just arguing against the idea that the G.C. is always responsible for all errors just because he paid. That in no way means that the homeowner is responsible....See MoreIs this Cause For Concern?
Comments (13)If they are "suddenly responsive" - I'd get some sort of structural inspector and talk to your neighbors. I'd hate to have this go bad later and the builder comes back with "hey - we even went back WELL AFTER the 1 year warranty period to dowry and this was not mentioned". It seems fishy that they suddenly give a darn about customer satisfaction. Invest in a report by a professional. If your neighbors are seeing the same - go in together on a group buy. Focus on homes started the same time as yours - as my experience has been that cheater and quality issues seem to degrade over time - i.e. superintendent starts out doing everything right and little by little...... with less and less supervision...... And you might want to find your permit and see if you and see all the inspection notes your county's website - see if your house failed anything like footings, etc....See Morerwiegand
9 years agoDLM2000-GW
9 years agolast modified: 9 years agoVith
9 years agolast modified: 9 years agoILoveRed
9 years agoUser
9 years agoVith
9 years agoDLM2000-GW
9 years agoLori Wagerman_Walker
9 years agoILoveRed
9 years ago
Related Stories
FIREPLACESUpdated Woodstoves Keep Home Fires Burning
Better technology means more efficiency than ever for modern woodstoves
Full StoryFUN HOUZZSurvey Says: We’re Scared of Being Home Alone — and Spiders
A new Houzz survey reveals that most of us get spooked in an empty house. Find out what’s causing the heebie-jeebies
Full StoryHOUZZ TOURSHouzz Tour: Steel Fuses Industrial and Modern in a California Pavilion
Heavy on metal, this two-story addition entertains with a stargazing hot tub, a fire pole and an unusual fire feature
Full StoryDINING ROOMSNew This Week: Proof the Formal Dining Room Isn’t Dead
Could graphic wallpaper, herringbone-patterned floors, wine cellars and fire features save formal dining rooms from extinction?
Full StoryDECORATING GUIDESDiscover the Unstoppable Advantages of Cork for the Home
Look beyond wine stoppers to see cork's ecofriendliness, durability, fire resistance and antimicrobial nature for all kinds of home products
Full StoryKITCHEN DESIGNGet Cookin' With the Right Microwave
Energy zapped from trying to pick a microwave model and location? This guide will fire up your decision making
Full StoryKITCHEN DESIGNStandouts From the 2014 Kitchen & Bath Industry Show
Check out the latest and greatest in sinks, ovens, countertop materials and more
Full StoryREMODELING GUIDES7 Bad Things Your Home May Be Hiding
What you don't know about your home could cost you during a remodel. Here's what to plan for
Full StoryLIFERetirement Reinvention: Boomers Plot Their Next Big Move
Choosing a place to settle in for the golden years? You're not alone. Where boomers are going and what it might look like
Full Story
User