Attorney after my Trust

11 years ago

Hello and thank you for allowing me to join your forum:
Hopefully, my posting isn't too far out in left field. If it is, just toss it back to me and I'll try to catch it.

I have been involved in a law suit, of sorts, for the past 4 1/2 years. It started out as a Quiet Title by Adverse Possession, which I filed, for: Ready for this? 6" of dirt and a 35-year-old fence that divides the two lots. The fence is 389.80' long and the last 100' encroaches onto the next lot by 6" decreasing to 0 over the 100' length, where it rejoins the natural boundary line and continues on.

The people that bought the lot have been relentless in possessing the dirt and exclusive ownership of this fence. I have owned my lot for 15+ years and from 1973 until 2007 their lot sat vacant, no development. Of course I believed the property boundary fence was mine.

In the lawsuit I filed, in 2008, the defendants atty decided she need to have my trust documents "to establish ownership of my property," even though the county recorder has excellent records on my trust owning the property, she attempted, through the courts, to force me to produce my entire trust document. I don't think so!

Now, in Nov. 2011, they have filed a new lawsuit, same issues. However, the statute of limitations expired on their claim 3 years ago and the judge refused to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. So, since last Nov. we have been having regularly scheduled "Status conferences" to have the taxpayers pay for this dog and pony show, again. Once again, the same atty is after my trust documents. Between law suits I converted my revocable trust to an irrevocable trust, mainly to protect my property from these tyrants. The atty filed a motion for an order to compel me to hand over my trust documents. I informed the judge that the new trust had not been recorded to protect the privacy of myself and my beneficiaries. He denied her motion. She then set out on a mission to locate the trustee, with no luck. Now, she has abandoned that idea and has consulted with a title agent who has informed her that they can "Pass Clear Title" on my property if I don't produce the trust, and that she is no longer interested in joining the trustee of the new trust. Can they? I have retained two attys and they haven't exactly had my interests in mind so I am now Pro Se. This is a very convoluted issue and I will understand if you just delete the post. But, I do request that you not post something negative about my IQ for posting it.

Thanks,
stillseekingtrth

Sort by:Oldest

Comments (11)

lazy_gardens
11 years ago
You have spent 4 1/2 years, dozens of hearings, and paid 2 attorneys.

For what you describe as 6" of dirt and a 35-year-old fence?
User
11 years ago
"I do request that you not post something negative about my IQ for posting it."

OK, no shots at your brains on this. But, you are letting either pique or some odd emotional attachment overrule your brains here. What you have been doing is not at all logical given the information you have provided. If you can't see that, then well, all bets are off on the brains issue.
Related Discussions
Who owns this house? (For purposes of living trust)
Q
Comments (10)
Due to the way the capital gains law is structured, you should try to avoid listing a joint owner (non-spousal) of RE assets that have appreciated. I don't believe they get the critical full "step-up" basis that an inherited asset would receive. For those with larger estates, it's crucial to pay attention to the changing limits on Federal Estate Taxes. The limit is $3.5M in 2009. In 2010 there is NO limit (your state of domicile may still have estate taxes due, however). If Congress does nothing the Federal Estate Tax limit reverts to $1M in 2011. Although there is talk they will keep the 2009 limits, NOTHING has been actually decided. I've been the executor of a will and the trustee of a Trust. There is no contest - a trust is easier to close than a will. That said, I mean a **properly done trust** - not a boilerplate document created on the cheap by someone who couldn't be bothered to ask the necessary questions before creating the trust. Our MIL's trust, and our own RLT, was created by an excellent attorney for $2500 flat fee (apiece). This included over seven hours of pre-trust meetings to establish what each trust needed to be, creating not only the two trusts but also the necessary additional documents: pourover wills, financial power of attorney, durable healthcare power of attorney. The attorney also filed the trusts and RE deeds in court to transfer the largest assets to the trusts (we were responsible for transferring the bank checking/savings and brokerage accounts). Neither us nor my MIL have what I'd consider complex financial situations. Nonetheless, the attorney took a great deal of time to clarify goals and customize each trust so that we're fully confident they reflect our individual preferences. I apologize for drifting OT, but for us, a trust will make settling our estate infinitely easier for our heirs.
...See More
What do I do if I cant trust my husband???? Help Me Please!!
Q
Comments (15)
WOW All we got here is a lot of neuroses popping out in all directions ... someone who was cheated on is SURE that the behavior means cheating, someone who was not cheated on thinks it means nothing ... and we have no real substantive data to make an evaluation on, so we all go off half-cocked based on our own positive or negative neurotic interpretations of her situation. None of that helps ... So what to do ? Well first of all concentrate on your own mental health and happiness and stability OUTSIDE of fixations with him. Reward yourself a couple times a day in some small constructive way for good things you do. Reward him in some small ways with a "thank you" when he does something good for you ... "Catch him doing something good" make the most of things and be as positive as you can be. If there is a real and substntive problem, it will eventually be fully revealed, if not, worrying and crying and getting upset will not help ... but just create a problem for you and him both. Make yourself happy and healthy. Dont hold your life hostage to his.
...See More
I've come full circle for paint - should have trusted my gut!
Q
Comments (11)
Mairin: Your kitchen is amazing! Have you posted any photos of your completed backsplash yet? Thank you so much for posting such good expansive shots of your RP walls. It looks a lot more tan on my screen, but I can tell that it is going to work great for me as my cabinets are almost as dark as yours and my granite is light (Blanco Romano). Based on the 14 x 8 panel I painted I tend to wonder if need to go a bit deeper in tone. I understand that most paint can be lightened as I've seen reference to 50% strength, but can the same thing be done to darken the paint? I was thinking perhaps just a 10% or 20% deepening. On the other hand once I get the full walls painted it may be just fine. I'll check out the decorator's white. Cloud White was also mentioned earlier but tends to be too yellow next to my horrible white/gray window frames that can't be changed out at this time, but BM lacey pearl might work well. raehelen: Cabot Trail reminds me of melted milk chocolate. The Edgecomb Gray which is next to the Revere Pewter on the swatch card has a bit more tan to it, but is still quite gray. It is lovely too, but I needed the cooler tone of the RP. In my spavce both tend to have a green cast in certain lights.
...See More
I dont trust my countertop company any longer!
Q
Comments (39)
IMO... if they say "we have to buy a full slab, so it is $1000 more" then YOU are paying for the full slab and should own the full damn slab. If he has to order an entire slab and does not expect to use it all, then he does not need to charge you the extra it seems to cost for an "entire slab" vs what he originally quoted. The other things, I would have balked at but he could very easily have said, "that is fine.. you can have 4 seams instead of one" and not raise the price... UNLESS he already quoted a 1-seam price and stated in writing it was 1-seam. Then.. I'd be mad and argue that they messed up.. they work it out. I would, however, if they were nice people and genuinely made an honest mistake, find an amicable deal... but that first part is ALL about the slab and while I personally think "here is the cost.. who cares what happens to the extra" if their excuse was that they have to charge you extra because they have to buy an entire new slab, then the slab is yours and I'd be firm on that... just me. Don't care what any designers say.. when they jack up all the prices and use that as an excuse.. they have to live by their choices of excuses. If they told me the slab I wanted went up in price.. yea.. I'd somewhat understand...
...See More
marie_ndcal
11 years ago
Since I am not a lawyer and do not know about the stress you are going thru, I would suggest you contact either your county district attorney or the state district attorney for some advice, To me the attorney sounds like she wants money for some reason--is she/he friends/relatives/or ??? of the people involved. I don't see how a title agent can do that legally, so I would suggest you talk to the owner of the title company/or state officials.
I do wish you the best.
Marie
brickeyee
11 years ago
You started this crazy fight.

"It started out as a Quiet Title by Adverse Possession, which I filed, for: Ready for this? 6" of dirt and a 35-year-old fence that divides the two lots."

Just drop the damn thing. It is 25 square feet (0.5 ft 8 100 Ft * 0.5 if it is smooth triangle) and 'YOUR' fence is on the worng land.

"the last 100' encroaches onto the next lot by 6" decreasing to 0 over the 100' length"

The fence is simply NOT yours any more for that portion.

Whomever installed it screwed up.

Let it go.

They are probably trying to figure out how to style a counter-suit and want as much detail of what legal entity owns the piece in dispute as they can gather.

They likely do not want to waste time filing against the wrong defendant.

You kicked the hornets nest.

This post was edited by brickeyee on Sat, Dec 22, 12 at 14:19
DLM2000-GW
11 years ago
I agree it sounds like much ado about nothing, or as Brickeye said, 25 sq ft. At some point you have to ask yourself why you are in this 'fight' and is it really the 25 sq ft that you want or some other less tangible 'asset'. These are your next door neighbors, for cryin' out loud - is it worth it and is this fight the right thing to do? When all is said and done, I don't question your IQ, I question what's really behind this and that's not clear.
sylviatexas1
11 years ago
I'd bet there's more to the story.

like, maybe there's a swimming pool within 5' of the fence & city ordinances or deed restrictions call for a 5'6" setback.
violetwest
11 years ago
imo, you are screwing yourself without an attorney. Your emotions are involved, and you can't advocate or negotiate for yourself properly.

Have the judge review the trust document in camera to determine whether it should be released (in camera means under seal, and why so stubborn on the release? it's costing you money and the principle of the thing isn't worth it). Then go to mediation and settle the damn thing.

This post was edited by Violet.West on Sun, Dec 23, 12 at 0:03
lafdr
11 years ago
Is there a way to just agree the fence is not entirely on either property and accept it as the agreed upon boundary? Then if a new fence is ever needed it can be put entirely on one property or the other? Or agree you will maintain the fence even the portion on their land?

When the neighbor bought their property, was there a survey that showed the fence crossed into their property line?

It is my understanding that this is a common problem (a fence crossing the property line).

Are you wanting to change the fence or be responsible for maintaining it? Or wanting to prevent them from changing it?

How much would it cost to build a new fence within your property line?

(I was going to ask how much it would be to move the existing fence, but is there a question of ownership since it is partially on their property?)

Did you build the fence?

If I bought a lot and the neighbor tried to "take" any part of it, I would resist as well. Especially if it decreased my lot size. Is there any land on their side of the fence in another area that is yours that could be traded so there is no decrease in either lot size?

I have bought property in a similar situation, with a cinderblock wall, and it said something like the wall is known to cross both properties. It was a 50 + year old wall and it was never a problem.

What is your reason for wanting legal ownership of that 6 inch strip of land?

It seems important to find a way to peacefully resolve this since they are your neighbors.

(Maybe you could offer to buy it from them?)

From their perspective, you were trying to "take" something that they felt they had paid for and had a title and deed for.

Good luck!
lafdr
11 years ago
PS I agree there does not seem to be any valid reason for the neighbor or attorney to see all of the wording and content of your trust!!!
jjaazzy
11 years ago
Years ago we purchased a small house on a small piece of property. When the survey was done we found out the fence was put up 3" into side neighbors yard. Neighbor wanted the fence moved. We gave him the fence. He's happy and that was the end of that. The fence is still there 20 years later.
brickeyee
11 years ago
" Neighbor wanted the fence moved."

That is one way to prevent the type of suit the OP has filed.

If you have cost the neighbor money they are likely not open to simply letting you drop things and go 'never mind.'

Attorney after my Trust

Comments (11)

lazy_gardens

User

Related Discussions

marie_ndcal

brickeyee

DLM2000-GW

sylviatexas1

violetwest

lafdr

lafdr

jjaazzy

brickeyee

COMPANY

BUSINESS SERVICES

GET HELP

CONNECT WITH US