I have a large number of cookbooks and have come across a phenomenon that seems to be found much more in American cookbooks than, say, European or Australian ones: the use of a shorthand that an outsider to the culture doesnt understand, and the assumption that something weighs the same everywhere, that everyone knows what it is, and that it will always remain the same.
I realise why the shorthand is probably used  I think itÂs for people who donÂt like to have to measure ingredients  but it is annoying nonetheless, especially when dealing with older cookbooks.
Example:
Butter measured in sticks rather than ounces is very common. The Internet came to my rescue on this one, but how about the white cake mix I came across in a 1950s cookbook, without further explanation or an amount? (All that was clear from the recipe that this was something you got ready-made from the supermarket).
How about the block of chocolate that I have come across in so many of these books? Did a block of chocolate weigh the same in the 1940s as it does in the 2000s? Did a stick of butter?
And was the white cake mix the same thing then as it is today (and what would Betty Crocker call it: Angel cake mix? Bisquick? Or something else?) and does the package weigh the same now as it did then?
What are "mixed spices"? I have come across this in different recipes and I doubt they are the same in all cases, as one recipe was for cookies (presumably containing some or all of the following: cinnamon, cloves, nutmeg, ginger, cardamom, allspice, anise) and another for something savoury (all bets are off on this one, but I would assume something like Season-All).
Can you help me with these questions, and do you have examples of cookbook shorthand or assumptions that annoy you?
teresa_nc7
velodoug
Related Discussions
UPDATE: mnf: waiting for spring #4
Q
Bastille Day - What To Eat?
Q
I want to be a better cook! Help
Q
Kitchen Layout with Concerns about Asymmetry & Breathing Room
Q
grainlady_ks
lindac
kathleenca