Jeri, do you have Rayon Butterflies or this one? They're both neat, similar but different. Kim Here is a link that might be useful: Rayon Butterfed

I do not use Live as my main email account but you can attach photos individually. Seems odd that they cannot be inserted as you would like. However if you attach them you could then refer to each photo by name and add your comments that way. Not as nice perhaps but it does offer a solution perhaps. Send an email to yourself using that method to see how it looks for you.

Betty if you are asking for assistance in creating something other than an e-mail and attaching photos, I have to to ask why not just use the Outlook Express, Outlook or Windows Mail on your system? Picaso2 is a fine application, but like all others it takes a little time learning how to win it over. Having seen your participation here for a while now, I personally am quite confident you can use it. It just takes a little practice; i.e. send experimental e-mails to yourself. I do it all the time when I am testing the configuration of a new application with an e-mail client. DA

I'm sorry I did not return to this thread for a few days. I am still puzzled by this issue. Here's what I do. I use Outlook to send emails. I want to attach, say, 3 photos to an e-mail. I select the photos from "Pictures" and individually attach them to the e-mail. But when the recipient opens each individual photo, there's a message in the top left hand corner of each photo that says "See All Photos." By clicking it the recipient can see ALL my albums (now called Collections in Windows 10). This did not happen prior to Windows10. I do not want recipients to see any photos but the few I'm selecting to send them. I've tried this repeatedly (by sending e-mails to myself) and cannot figure out how to get rid of the "See All Photos" message and/or somehow restrict access to the rest of my photos. I hope this makes sense! I have not tried dragging photos yet to the e-mail but will do so. I don't think this works in Outlook but I could be wrong.