I own and have installed quite a few photo editing programs but I prefer to use Picasa 3 (which, btw, is free) because it is so simple to use to upload to online albums (and their storage site with album(s) is also free up to 1 gig of media). They also provide the code to use to easily insert photos. Here's an example: From __Garden Flowers - plants You can choose the size of photo you want to be embedded, this one is smaller: From __Garden Flowers - plants If you haven't yet committed to a program to use for embedding garden photos, you might wish to consider Picasa 3. Mary Here is a link that might be useful: Picasa 3

you might look at http://www.ismywebsite.com/ Here is a link that might be useful: link

Is that correct or if I make photobucket 'public' should they be able to just go directly in without loggin in?) That is correct. If you provide the URL of the public album, they should be able to see it just fine. Another option is to post the pics themselves onto your site. The first one listed in the link below, is not as safe as the others per my WOT rating. Never be embarrassed to ask a question here. We were all new/newer to computers at one time, and I'm still learning lots of things especially from the great folks here. Sue Here is a link that might be useful: Free Websites

I've got clients using the free space that came with one of their DirecTV subscriptions, and they are (relatively) happy with it. On the (nearly) free hosting packages, often access to expanded features is harshly limited (or services a web server normally provides by "default" are turned off), and more fully featured packages at those same sites are substantialy above industry rates. If (when) you move to a better hosting package, look for something in the $99 a year range with a good feature bundle including PHP, MySQL database, and a variety of pre-configured scripts you can integrate into your site. UNIX based hosting will suit your needs just fine. Many plans in this range will support FrontPage, but I'd suggest staying away from Frontpage in the first place. Using Frontpage (or Express) ties future development of that site to Frontpage software on webservers supporting Frontpage because of all the proprietary junk it crams in. When I inherit a site that was previously developed in Frontpage (or with MS Office products), its often easier for me to paste all the site text into a plaintext editor (to strip the formatting) and then back into new documents, rebuilding the site and all its links and formatting from scratch. That's a lot more labor that my client gets charged for, when using a less obnoxious development program (and Netscape Composer is fine) would ahve let me either cut and pasted directly (preserving the internal links) or just modifying existing pages to incorporate the new "look and feel".