I believe the board has provided some valuable information. I have asked the following questions and have receive responses for most: (1) Response on why Kent was removed if possible. This seems to go back several years and all the details may never be known. This could be a soap opera. I respect the fact that due to personal or personnel issues all these details may not be available to the public. (2)A statement that the Board of Advisors will be retained with its current membership The board has indicated that it intends to maintain the Board of Advisors (3) Annual Report will continue to be available either through your web site, in a SSE publication or by request through SSE, They will publish SSE's financial statements in the annual Summer Editions as always (4) That the endowment to maintain SSE's seed collection be established No specific mention on that yet, but since the mission of the organization has not changed hopefully this should continue to move forward. (5) Statement that SSE's core mission will not change from preserving genetic diversity, seed exchanging and making these varieties available to its members. They have several time reinforced that SSEs mission and vision has not changed (6) What is SSEÂs governance structure? This has not changed even with the bylaw changes. We did not have governance before and do not have it now. Personally I feel even though adding governance would add expenses to membership that governance should be provided to members. Members established that valuable seed collection that exists and should have direct say on how it is used. (7) What committees have been formed since March 2007? SSE has six committees, in which SSE staff members, SSE Board of Advisors members, and SSE Board Members participate: Seed Collection Committee Publications Committee (SSE's publications include membership publications as well as books and a catalog) Audit & Finance Committee Personnel Committee Board Development Committee Executive Search Committee (ad hoc) All seem legitimate to me. (8)Why was the membership bylaw changed? I believe the response to this is that Iowa non-profit law changed. My brief research seems to indicate this language change although it seems dramatic, actually changed our member status very little, if at all. To quote IowaÂs code: "Member" means a person who on more than one occasion, pursuant to the provisions of a corporation's articles or bylaws, has a right to vote for the election of a director or directors of a corporation, irrespective of how a member is defined in the articles or bylaws of the corporation. We did not have governance before and do not have it now. This change may have the impression that our status or rights have been compromised when in fact they have not been. We never had governance. How that comes as a surprise to me even though I never received a voting form in the past give is alarming. I believe we always should have had governance and this issue just has opened my eyes to that. Iowa code still allows SSE to have membership and refer to us as members even though we are not members in the by-laws. This was the essentially the case before since we did not have governance and is the case today. (9) I also feel that an at-large member from a listed member that is not a major donor should be added to the board. This has not yet been addressed. A boardÂs widespread support requires a diverse board, including representation from groups the organization directly serves. (http://www.sos.state.ia.us/pdfs/Nonprofits/IAPP4CNE.pdf) I believe this should be examined as "members" who actually do the seed sharing should have an at large board member to represent our concerns, needs and wants for the organization. Hopefully the board will eventually fully answer my questions (4,8,9), but I feel they have answered many already. Two asides: Upon further research I believe SSE has always been a public benefit corporation even though members may of considered it more of a mutual benefit corporation when it concerned seed sharing. The board has a Fiduciary Duty. Although its actions may be unpopular nothing in its responses has indicated to me that they are not fulfilling this fiduciary duty.

Probably best to post this on the SSE website. Dean

George, I haven't followed the politics closely either and just felt the whole Kent Whealy episode was very unfortunate both for the family and for the organization. I hope this latest transition is a smooth one. Too much turmoil too often can shake people's faith in a group and I'd hate to see the legacy of SSE tarnished. I wouldn't expect you to stop saving/offering seeds. Far from it. SSE needs for its members to keep on doing what they do and have done so well for such a long time. I just wanted to post this info when I saw it so you and others familiar with SSE wouldn't be blindsided by the news. The fact that it has not thus far resulted in the same type of communications put out last time is a hopeful sign that this is a positive move and that no one wants it to be a disruptive thing, right? Ideally, SSE members and customers won't have to endure the transitional problems that occurred last time. SSE is a fine organization with an umblemished history. (I don't hold the KW thing against them because they aren't the ones that went public and made a big issue of it--he did). SSE is the heart and soul of the heirloom movement in this country and always has been. I hope that never changes. Dawn

I don't think it's necessary to buy the source book at first. With over 3,000 varieties listed in the Yearbook, which comes out not always in Feb, although that's a target date, there's plenty to chose from. And as a long time Life member of SSE I don't think SSE membership is for everyone. Don't get me wrong here, being a member helps very much to further the goal of SSE which is preservation of OP varieties . But I'd prefer to see folks join who have had some experience in growing tomatoes and that's b'c a certain percentage of seeds you request may not be pure and you need to know how to rogue out plants and you also need to know how to save seeds in terms of reoffering varieties that you might request. And while reoffering is desired, not everyone does it, unfortunately. And I agree with what jackbenny said above, in that the Yearbook should never be seen as a seed catalog. After a person has grown lots of the more common varieties offered commercially, then I think it's fine to go searching for the more rare varieties that are offered there. The other fact to note is that there are listed SSE members and non listed members and as mentioned above, listed members list their varieties in the Yearbook and those seeds are available to both listed and unlisted members but the cost/pack is higher for unlisted members. Currently, for US members the cost of a pack of tomato seeds is $2 for listed members and $3 for unlisted members. A few folks like myself ask the same price for both listed and unlisted members. So by all means if a person is interested in preserving genetic diversity I would urge anyone to join SSE if not for obtaining seed, then just for helping SSE with your membership monies. SSE has been an important part of my tomato life, as it were, LOL, and I've made many good friends through the years. I joined I think in 1989, and it's been a great experience for me. There's also a PUBLIC catalog with about 40 or so varieties that anyone can order from and the online version can be found at seedsavers.org Carolyn