I'm not positive, but it resembles Alternanthera 'Partytime;' Here is a link that might be useful:

I think you are right! I found some info on the web. Common name is winter jasmine, and it's supposed to produce yellow blooms on "last season's growth." Well, I thought it was something else, and I've been keeping it pruned! So there's been no "last season's growth" and I consequently haven't seen any flowers! Sigh. Well! I will just have to lay off the pruners this year and see what happens!

Carol, I have Pickering's Four Seasons so know it's not the same. catspa, eureka! I think you found it. Baron de Bonstatten wasn't listed when I bought it but is available this year and I actually have it on reserve. It's a fantastic rose even with my conditions. Says it can be grown as a climber too. Maybe I'll use it with Florence Bower's Pink Tea on the other side of the arch. Thanks for checking Jan's rose list. Good detective work. You get the Miss Marple award. Diane

I can think of a logical explanation for Vinelover's (surprising) guess of Pristine. Like Vinelover and Rosetom, I grow both Pristine and Tiffany in my yard. When I read Vinelover's post (above), my reaction was the same as Rosetom's ..."Pristine is not even a close guess." First: Vinelover says his/her Pristine blooms are "highly fragrant." But we know Pristine is NOT "highly fragrant." Not even close. (The ARS description of Prisitne says it has "slight" fragrance. HMF says "mild.") Second: Vinelover says he/she has both Tiffany and Pristine, and "they look identical colorwise just before the bud opens." But we know that even as an opening bud Pristine does not have Tiffany's big yellow petal-bases. So... why is Vinelover reporting characteristics for Pristine that it does not have? I think the logical answer can only be... Vinelover's Pristine is a mis-labeled rose. If that is the case, then what rose does Vinelover actually have? To me, it sounds like Vinelover is describing the blooms of Secret. It is highly fragrant rose, it has a lot of yellow at the petal-base, and its barely-opened buds CAN (in certain climates) look very similar to Tiffany. When you look at a bunch of photos of a rose-variety at HelpMeFind, sometimes you see one photo that is "not even close" to what the rest of the photos look like. For a long time I have wondered why that happens. I think the answer is: someone UN-KNOWINGLY contributed a photo of a mis-labeled rose. Approximately ten days ago, in another thread, I mentioned that I insisted for two years in these forums that Oklahoma has mild fragrance and only about 25 petals - because I was describing the "Oklahoma" I had bought and planted in my yard. Then in 2004 I discovered my "Oklahoma" was actually a mis-labeled bodybag bareroot. Color me dark-red with embarrassment! I'm just glad I never contributed a photo of it into HelMeFind's collection of Oklahoma photos! But (quite obviously in some cases), other people have done that - because they innocently believed the INCORRECT paper identification-label on the "Oklahoma" (or "Pristine") rosebush they bought. Regards, JohnReb