SHOP PRODUCTS
Houzz Logo Print
gonebananas_gw

Amending soil in the planting hole, from one extreme to the other

gonebananas_gw
13 years ago

Gardening, like much else, is prone to habits, fads, prevailing notions, and myths, all of which occasionally change (roughly generational time scale) and all of which are subject to limitations or outright errors. Like elsewhere, gardening also is prone to universal extrapolation from specific cases ("THE way to do it").

Rules of thumb are fine, especially for beginners or where evaluating specifics (especially underground) are too much trouble to be worth it. General fertilization advice useful even without soil-test specifics is an example here.

But turn our attention to planting holes. Gardening has gone from "amend as copiously as you can afford (except for strong chemical fertilizer that can burn roots)" all the way over to "avoid amendments like the plague, they bring potential, even likely harm."

My take comes from considerable casual reading of horticultural literature (that is, without intensively researching this exact topic), and considerable growing experience in sandy soils, and some professional background related to drainage.

I feel that today's advice, "DON'T amend," has some value, in many places, and vast numbers of exceptions. It would be better stated as "Don't make the hole's backfill greatly more permeable (easier for water to flow through) than the surrounding native soil, IF the native soil is fairly slow draining: clay, silt, or clayey loam. The backfilled hole can accumulate root-drowning water in a semi-perched saturated zone, the "bathtub effect" now familiar to hydrologists at nuclear and hazardous waste landfills.

Moderate, even relatively heavy amending of low volume (thus don't effect permeability much) nonburning organic fertilizers should be OK in almost any soil. Limestone, bone meal, lower-grade phosphates, old manure, cottonseed or soil or alfalfa or fish meal.

Moderate to copious amending of planting holes in sand soils seems not only harmless but positively beneficial, whether or not amendments are voluminous and permeability is changed. Here one can include, instead or aside the organic fertilizers, some nonfertilizer silts, clays, or more often sterile peats (sphagnum peat of little fertility) to intentionally increase water holding capacity. Nutrients won't keep roots inside the backfilled hole, witness roots that freely leave pots lying on the less-fertile ground. Roots will follow the receding moisture, beneath or outside the backfilled hole (downward by natural drainage, outward by transpiration "drainage" by the plant itself).

Finally, some plants such as palms seem especially benefited by copious amendments to the planting hole. All their new roots throughout the life of the plant start at the plant base, in the soil of the planting hole. The old adage seems better here than the new practice (while still giving attention to any clay soil problem: "Choose a fifty cent palm in a five dollar hole over a five dollar palm in a fifty cent hole" (adjust prices upward from ca. 1930).

I am interested in the take of others on this topic.

Comments (5)