I actually feel kind of stupid or perhaps I should be kinder to myself and say I am very surprised! When working on the spare bathroom choices I gave some thought to using all of the available space, knowing I could fairly easily fit in a 66 inch tub if I were willing to do some framing work. I went back to Mirabelle as I wanted to keep costs as minimal as possible (noot cheap just not wanting a Kohler Underscore price unless I were willing to drop the Kallista in Master. I wasn't :) I looked at the 66 inch Mirabelle Edenton and did not at first catch the width. Only 36 and that won't fit in the spare. Without making a short story long I looked at the alcove versions but the Edenton required access from the side, something that for my home would be very messy. The Bradenton series offered a removable skirt but I had seen one before and wasn't sure I liked the look. But the Bradenton had decent leg room. So my duh huh moment. I looked at the 32 inch wide Edenton drop in tun and lo and behold it was 44 1/2 inches. I revisited the 36 inch wide Edenton drop in and sure enough its legroom was 37 or so inches. This was main reason I had dropped this from my short list. Had no idea the 36 inch wide version would be that much shorter. Now I see why Kevin had no trouble fitting in his tub! It has nearly as much legroom as the Kallista ( 1 1/2 inches less). The 32 inch will fit with a small deck in the alcove spot for my spare and I probably will do the air option. The spare has rapidly become an upscale room anyway and having a nice relaxing air tub there won't be worst thing. My son will love it when he visits and he won't invade the Master. Moral of story.. if any given dimension is important to you be sure to check every tub and size as internal measurements can be grossly different that external measurements. I thought I had already learned that but alas i quickly forgot it if I did. This may be a win win for us though as the wiring for spare will be simpler.

Thank you for your response..I have 6" of wall space on each side from the edge of the vanity. I was thinking I will go with 20" even though I am yearning for 22". I want to go as high as possible for an 8' ceiling and 36" high vanity. Does 40" work? Too high and narrow? I cannot find any pictures. Just my freehand sketches...

I think you might find that brighter LED lights will provide enough light on their own. Adding sconces, along with the two upper lights, would be too many fixtures in your space, I think. If you just had one upper fixture, it might work, but four fixtures is too many. Since you love your existing lights, what about, if the new bulbs don't fix the problem, putting in a larger mirror (I think you could use a larger one there, which will also reflect more light) and back-lighting it for more light down low? You could also cover the whole area with mirror and install your lights through the mirror which will cause the lights to reflect even more light in the area. these are more sconce style but I think mounting yours high with mirror behind them would work

Hi Beverly, thanks for the photos you provided. I should have clarified that I would like to place a mirror above the sink which is in the middle of the 78 inch vanity and then use sconces on each side of the mirror. Most websites suggest the sconces should be no more than 40 inches apart. I was just wondering if anyone had placed them further apart than that and how did that work.