Humidity effect on Hickory on Sacramento, CA with hydronic heating
Lamaia Coleman
5 years ago
last modified: 5 years ago
Featured Answer
Sort by:Oldest
Comments (24)
Related Discussions
Pink Climber needed to replace Cec. Brunner Santa Cruz CA
Comments (29)Some examples: On Nov 12, 2007, Kell from Northern California, CA (Zone 9b) wrote: I am not too happy with this climber. I have 2 of them. The one in the front yard I grow as a fountain rose, pruning it every winter to a few feet. It has many canes now and puts on a grand spring show. The blooms are long lasting and it takes a long time for all the roses in the cluster opens. However the repeat bloom is poor. In the back yard, I have this growing on an arbor but not for much longer. Again the blooms are sparse but here even in the spring. The plant has had powdery mildew and just looks unhappy. On Jul 8, 2010, levon1972 from Rio Rancho, NM wrote: Initially, was very happy with this rosa social climber "Jacweave". Planted on two trellises, each plant produced small, lovely, pink roses in its 1st season, then in 2nd season did the same but must say blooms did not last long from April. Now in our 3rd season we had in April a mass of new buds everywhere at first, but we pruned them after blooming and then"" Nada,Zip, Nothing" since then. On Mar 7, 2011, monniemon from Lansdale, PA wrote: Social climber is in her 3rd season, she had taken our zone 6 winters well. This rose is a very fast grower, gives beautiful blooms but did not rebloom for me at all last year. So i have decided to shovel her and to put Aloha Climber in her place. Jackson & Perkins has Social Climber listed as a repeat bloomer, they really need to change that to (occasional/once blooming)!. Iam sure that others purchased this rose and wasted 3 seasons on it to see it grow and then was very disappointed that it has no reblooming cycle. Social climber had one great show in the end of april and has had no other blooms since, not even a bud. The rose only blooms once. I have had social climber for four seasons now and have given it every opportunity to produce the 35plus petals that Jackson Perkins says it has and to rebloom as stated in the JP descripiton of this rose. I find it all to be misleading, first of all, i have seen no more that 16-20 petals on this rose, secondly, it does NOT REPEAT!!! For this reason, i will shovel and replace this rose next growing season with Aloha Climber. And there are good reviews too: Just thought I'd add my 2 cents in here. I've now had this climber for 6 years - nearly shoveled it years 2-3 as it grew, but only had a single mediocre flush in the spring, and nothing more. HOWEVER, the last 3 years, it just gets better and better. HUGE spring/early summer flush, several smaller ones during the hottest part of summer, and then a nice finale in the late summer early fall. Not much scent to mine, but it sure is pretty. On May 3, 2009, patricia4 from Beaumont, CA wrote: Absolutely love this rose! I have two climbing on the block wall fence here in Beaumont, CA where temperatures reach over a 100 degrees every summer and it sometimes snows in March. Plus we get a great deal of wind. In April and May the roses put on a magnificient show. The flowers seem to glow in the sun. Even though the repeat bloom is not as showy as in April, the roses still put on a fine show. Social Climber has been trouble free. My husband and I love to sit out in our yard and look at these beautiful roses. I am moving to Tennessee and hope to be able to grow them there. From others' comments, I'm wondering if this is a rose that really needs to be fanned strongly. If a rose blooms less as it gets older, but still very young, maybe it's growing too upright? I'm going to go on and put mine where she can be trained more horizontally than I'd planned. It could possibly be that she's a heavy feeder? Maybe she blooms less later because she needs a bunch of goodies each year. Hollie...See MoreFraming and insulation -limited by Canadian codes?
Comments (10)I just heard back from a local foam installer (seem reputable). He proposed 3" closed cell foam in the wall (R20.4 at low 90's% efficiency), and 4" directly in the cathedral (vaulted) ceiling (R29.2 at mid 90's% efficiency). I asked about these, "in my opinion", very minimal thicknesses in order to meet code, and the potential for ice damming. He argued that a completely sealed envelope will not cause any moist air to escape, hence no ice damming. He also believed that 4" would not cause any snow to melt either (said that cabins up north only have 3" without issues) What I like about this idea: the best air tightness possible (?). I don't have my drawings ready yet, so he could only give me a rough cost, but although this is more expensive than standard 2*6 with Roxul batts, is is significantly better and likely "only" a couple grand more, if I include in our own saved labour. In the grand scheme, I'm more than ok with that. in a single 2*4 wall, electrical would have to be installed first (ok, whatever), but the insulation behind the boxes would be very thin, and the wires would likely be IN the foam. How would that work in 20 years when for some reason we'd need to re-wire the place? Another big question: is the proposed thickness enough??? It also does not solve the thermal barrier issue. Would it make sense to increase the thickness a bit in order to cover the 2*4, then do another "interior" wall to install the electrical? (likely another stupid question, but could you also add the ventilation (HRV ducts) in this space?) Another option might be to do 2*6, filled 3.5-4"(?) with foam, then leave the rest open for electrical to be installed after. This leaves a full bridge though, but perhaps that's not that important?? For the ceilings we aren't limited by thickness at all, and can go with whatever. I'm just not sure what would make the most sense. Any additional thickness would drive the costs up to a point where it might not be financially viable anymore. Any input at all would be highly appreciated! Thanks...See MoreNew to this Forum, not to GardenWeb, need answers :-)
Comments (8)Hi, TigerDunes, Thank you for your response. I'm thrilled to see that we shouldn't be expecting a minimum of $10,000 to $15,000!!! I posted at close to 1:30 a.m. Pacific Time, and I just got home from work about 7:30 p.m. so I'm just now getting online, after 8:00 p.m. Yes, we're sort of thinking we'd replace the furnace only, keeping the outside AC condenser. We're not at all opposed to replacing the AC condenser, but it hasn't given us problems, so if it would be a huge increase in cost to replace it, we'd skip that, at least on this go-round. If it's not a huge increase in cost, we'd replace it along with the furnace. Yes, we'd want a unit that's tax credit qualified. I have no idea what size and efficiency we're replacing. I looked for the booklet/paperwork on it before I came upstairs, but I can't find it. Used to keep all of those things in a drawer in the kitchen, but I discovered tonight that my husband repurposed that drawer for wine accessories... and he cannot remember where he put all of the booklets/paperwork, although he states he didn't throw the stuff away. I do know that the existing units (furnace and AC) have been sufficient to keep the house nice and warm in the winter and nice and chilled in the summer. There are just the two of us living here, and we both work full time, Monday through Friday. The set-back thermostat is completely programmed, both for summer and winter. The appropriate unit is programmed to come on approximately 30 minutes before I get up (takes me longer to get ready in the morning than it takes my Hubs), to warm/cool the house as necessary, and then it goes off (well, maintains a colder-in-the-winter or warmer-in-the-summer temperature) about 30 minutes before we leave for work, until about 30 minutes before we get home when it comes on again to again make the interior comfortable. Then it will cycle on/off as necessary throughout the evening until about 11:30 p.m. when it again shuts off and only comes on if it gets way too cold (winter) or way too warm (summer) overnight. On weekends it's programmed to not come on until about 90 minutes later than during the week, and will maintain the "morning temperature" throughout the day and evening and then shut off at 11:30 p.m. As for "normal winter temperatures" here... gosh... OK, I just Googled "normal winter temperatures for Sacramento, California," and one of the results had this to say: "Sacramento, CA climate is warm during summer when temperatures tend to be in the 70's and cool during winter when temperatures tend to be in the 50's. The warmest month of the year is July with an average maximum temperature of 93.80 degrees Fahrenheit, while the coldest month of the year is December with an average minimum temperature of 40.40 degrees Fahrenheit. Temperature variations between night and day tend to be relatively big during summer with a difference that can reach 32 degrees Fahrenheit, and fairly limited during winter with an average difference of 16 degrees Fahrenheit. The annual average precipitation at Sacramento is 19.87 Inches. Winter months tend to be wetter than summer months. The wettest month of the year is January with an average rainfall of 4.18 Inches." Another site said this: "The climate for Sacramento is Mediterranean with mild winters and dry summers. There is usually low humidity in the area. Light rainfall usually falls between December and February. Sacramento average annual rainfall is 17.18 inches per year The average winter temperature is 53.5 degrees F. The average spring temperature is 64.0 degrees F. The average summer temperature is 88.0 degrees F. The average fall temperature is 72 degrees F." It can, and does, get above 100 degrees in July and/or August. Every winter we probably have one or two nights where it gets down to the low 30-degree range. But as long as the house is somewhere in the low to mid 70-degree range in the winter, and no more than mid 80-degree range in the summer, we'd be happy. Does any of that help?...See MoreVents on the ceiling?
Comments (33)Northern Cal - no snow. Cold? It is always so fun to hear what people think is cold or hot. Everyone seems to think their climate is extreme. If you don't get snow - then you aren't at elevation - correct? If you are not at elevation, then you don't get cold by what many in the US would think is cold. Sure cold for Palo Alto. But true cold is Minnesota. It is like when people complain about NC (where I live) getting hot. 5 days above 95 a year is what we are. That is not hot. AZ - that is hot. I was a little crude/rude whatever with the absurd comment. But don't ignore what I said that zones are rarely done correctly. My last house was zoned. It was 6000 sqft and we had 2 units with 4 zones total. One zone was the basement - that is pretty typical and required by our codes. Then we had the master suite separate from the rest of upstairs. We had an infant and we like to sleep cold - like 60 winter, 65 summer. No zoning this time because despite Carrier Infinity having the most sophisticated zoning system available in conventional residential HVAC, it was not great. Mostly it was not great because we went through 2 motors in 7 years. It was an install issue - but the ducts were large and so were the returns. But 9 zones might make sense if it is a 10k sqft U shaped 3 story house. But what I see is a degree of paranoia about temps leading to an overengineered system. That system will break and it will happen more often than a simple system. CA codes require better than average US insulation relative to climate. This goes a long way towards making a comfortable house....See MoreLamaia Coleman
5 years agoLamaia Coleman
5 years agoionized_gw
5 years agoUser
5 years agolast modified: 5 years agoLamaia Coleman
5 years agolast modified: 5 years agoLamaia Coleman
5 years agoLamaia Coleman
5 years agodavidrt28 (zone 7)
5 years agolast modified: 5 years agoionized_gw
5 years agolast modified: 5 years agoLamaia Coleman
5 years agoLamaia Coleman
5 years agodavidrt28 (zone 7)
5 years agolast modified: 5 years agoElmer J Fudd
5 years agolast modified: 5 years agoionized_gw
5 years agoLamaia Coleman
5 years agoionized_gw
5 years ago
Related Stories
GREAT HOME PROJECTSHow to Add a Radiant Heat System
Enjoy comfy, consistent temperatures and maybe even energy savings with hydronic heating and cooling
Full StoryFLOORSFloors Warm Up to Radiant Heat
Toasty toes and money saved are just two benefits of radiant heat under your concrete, wood or tile floors
Full StoryFLOORSIs Radiant Heating or Cooling Right for You?
Questions to ask before you go for one of these temperature systems in your floors or walls (yes, walls)
Full StoryFLOORSWhat to Ask When Considering Heated Floors
These questions can help you decide if radiant floor heating is right for you — and what your options are
Full StoryLANDSCAPE DESIGNCalifornia Says Goodbye to the Sprawling Ornamental Lawn
New state rules will effectively limit turfgrass to 25 percent of the landscape in most new and renovated yards
Full StoryGARDENING AND LANDSCAPINGHow to Make a Pond
You can make an outdoor fish paradise of your own, for less than you might think. But you'll need this expert design wisdom
Full StoryREMODELING GUIDESWhen to Use Engineered Wood Floors
See why an engineered wood floor could be your best choice (and no one will know but you)
Full StoryBATHROOM DESIGNA Designer Shares Her Master-Bathroom Wish List
She's planning her own renovation and daydreaming about what to include. What amenities are must-haves in your remodel or new build?
Full StoryBASEMENTSDesign Workshop: Is It Time to Let Basements Become Extinct?
Costly and often unnecessary, basements may become obsolete — if they aren’t already. Here are responses to every reason to keep them around
Full StoryDECORATING GUIDES25 Design Trends Coming to Homes Near You in 2016
From black stainless steel appliances to outdoor fabrics used indoors, these design ideas will be gaining steam in the new year
Full Story
User