The first one looks like Fortuniana.

I LOVE the third one!

The first one looks like Fortuniana

My thought also. Most/all of the rest are probably from among that vast, comparatively faceless sea of modern roses.

Oops, I think that first one might have been a close-up. I need to get my scale in there next time. I think it could be a white banksiae enlarged. Will check tomorrow.

The third one was intriguing. All of the shrubs look old and neglected, but the only one that looked old was the pink one. I will someday go and knock on their door.
I am hoping to find some old modern faces, like 'Golden State' and 'Darling' on our walks. :O)

The last one reminds me of a Handel in shade.

1) R. Fortuniana

2) No idea, but looks modern-ish, perhaps with Tea leanings.

3) Looks like one of the pink Austins, but I'd have to see the foliage to be more certain.

4) Possibly 'Handel', as Kim suggested.

Jet -- that white one really is more-likely Fortuniana than R. banksia banksia. That bloom is typical of Fort. Banksia is more like little puffballs.

Ok, I put my hand in the photo this time.

Definitely a big flower and looks like yours, Jeri.

So I see that it goes by many names: http://www.helpmefind.com/rose/l.php?l=2.2810.9 (including Double Cherokee)

And it says it was used for rootstock.

I have a photo of a house-eating La Marque rose ... budded on Cherokee stock" from 1871. Would that have been this same rose (to someone in 1871)?

From the bloom form ... I've never seen Fort blooms look like that.

Janet, if you do end up knocking on a door to ask about a rose, also inquire if they know of other places in town with old roses. The question sometimes brings out interesting answers.

The form and foliage in the second picture reminds me of iceberg. Mine gets a similar pink cast to it in cool weather.

The rose bush is about two stories high and as wide, so not Iceberg. Unless there is an iceberg tucked into this tangled mass. I will be knocking on this person's door soon.

Jeri, I thought it was an exact match for your picture. What characteristic looks different? Or is it the bud?

I'm missing the pink cast in the photos. The only thing I see that looks reddish are some dead twigs.

Great Googly Moogly!!! That's a rose?! The giant green tree looking thing behind the truck? Can you tell I'm from the frozen North? Here when our roses are taller then the average person and we all stand and gape. That is big on a scale I'm not sure I can register in association with "rose".

Yes, that's the rose. :O)

I saw a picture of a Chestnut Rose like that once.

https://www.blithewold.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/chestnut-rose-6-1-11.jpg

I don't know if it would grow where you live. But some roses definitely do get that big.

Someone with botanical knowledge would have to identify it from the leaves, thorns, hips, etc., if it is not presently in bloom.

Yikes! Oh please go back and get some pictures of that monster blooming

Fort is certainly capable of achieving that size in CA, and the bristly flowerstalks, buds, foliage and flowers all look the part to yours truly. It doesn't look like 'Lamarque' to me, but that can also attain a monstrous size in that neck of the woods.

I would also like to see photos of blooms...

Virginia

That's a rose?

World's Largest Rose Tree

http://tombstonerosetree.com/worlds-largest-rose-tree/

Monarda and Karen, the Chestnut rose I saw growing in Wooster, Ohio was a huge bush and that's in zone 5. I never knew the blooms were so beautiful.

This is Atmore Lamarque here after a few nights in the twenties.

Wonderful link to the "World's Largest Rose Tree" of Tombstone, Arizona. I had read about it in Graham Stuart Thomas's Climbing Roses Old and New (1964) and always remembered, although inaccurately, his description of this remarkable specimen but had never seen pictures of it before. I still have the book. Here is what he said:

"An article in Arizona Highways for January 1956, kindly sent to me by Mr. W.L. Hunt of North Carolina, describes a tree in Tombstone, Arizona, of the double white form [of the Banksia rose] supported as a canopy and covering 4,620 square feet; it produces hundreds and thousands of blooms. To be there at flowering time and to smell the fragrance of violets floating from it must be among the greatest floral experiences of the world." - Graham Stuart Thomas, Climbing Roses Old and New (1965), pp. 145-46

We made it once just at the height of the bloom. I really think the most remarkable thing was the overwhelming scent of violets that hit us, as we opened the old screen door out onto the patio. It's a remarkable sight.

Kim -- That Fortuniana that you show is the one from which I took the cuttings that became my big Fort that climbs up the hillside. I took the cuttings in Sept., and it was blooming.

I don't doubt it, Jeri. It, like Banksiae, will continue flowering until the real heat arrives to 'tell it' to stop flowering because 'spring' is over. Remember all the reports over the years of the "repeat blooming Banksiaes" along the coast? Yup, "spring" lasts many months until the "heat" arrives, so the plant keeps thinking it's spring so it keeps blooming. My Fortuniana flowered the whole of the first two years we were here and refused to grow. This "winter" has been dry and it stopped flowering and started throwing thorny, long whips and is now starting to flower again. Whatever the conditions tell the plant to do, it does. If there is enough water and the temperatures don't signal spring is over, it flowers until the heat tells it to stop. Lutescens spasmed flowers most of last summer here and the ones on the freeway didn't stop all summer, either. If the heat comes on like inland valley heat, they stop quickly. If spring lingers, so do the flowers.

Yes. I used to see blooms through much of the summer. Now, we get big heatwaves, and it stops.