Hi. I just wanted to revive this thread for a bit more clarification. I copied the url for the parts list of my 10323. I have the wire drills bits and am ready to rejet, but wanted to know why the pilot jet is not listed in the parts list. The part number (98-7041) is also not listed. The mainjet is clearly identified and is not a problem, but is there another name for the pilotjet. Slowspeed, idle and 37.5 also do not appear. Does the 10323 simply not have a pilotjet? I haven't looked behind the sticker on the carb yet, so I have no idea yet. Thanks in advance. Regards, Stevan Here is the Link: https://lookup2.toro.com/request/getpub1.cfm?PubID=13009&PubNum=3321-570&Lang=EN&Cust=anonymous_user&xCaller=lawnboy&Filesize=2394941&vKey=1983392&PubType=11

This is New Dawn in a fairly cold 6a These are about 15 years old now, and about as big as they are going to get. Training them is the definition of garden evil, since the hill is nastier than the thorns, and New Dawn thorns are nothing to sneeze at. I wouldn't even think of putting it on a front porch if anybody ever used the porch. There is a gravel path on the other side of the wall, and any canes that interfere there are quickly zapped. Now I do think that this is a particular good clone of New Dawn since these are cuttings from a plant that was planted in the 1930's. Basically, New Dawn should be hardy, however it won't grow to monstrous proportions and unless we are talking about a small stoop won't be big enough to cover a porch, and training it to keep it in bounds will be a major, continuous job, often requiring a ladder. That's the big advantage of a pillar rose - that most of the training can be done from ground level. The roses I have with endless canes are setigera hybrids. Those are once bloomers, but they are big, hardy and trainable. Those roses you could run up the pillars and across the roof.

Lpink, the verb "to be" in Russian exists only in the infinitive form and is never conjugated and almost never used. Perhaps that's where it came from. I have a lot of pet peeves about British English - the main one being that they almost always add "and" after "try" instead of "to". They will say, "Try and do better," instead of "Try to do better." When "and" is added, the "try" part is unnecessary since the possibility of failure is not considered. They don't make this mistake in the past tense, however. I do like the way the British pronounce the word "water", as it is spelled, instead of the way Americans do, as if it were spelled with a "d". I've observed a number of ways that the phrase "isn't it" from "innit" from Cockneys to "iddinit" in the American South. I've also heard "I'm going to" pronounced a number of ways from "I'm gonna" to "Imonna" to "Imo" or "Ima". That one amuses me, but I hate it when people who are giving demonstrations (especially chefs) start a sentence with "What I'm going to do next is I'm going to..." instead of starting with "Next I'm going to..." I tend not to like to hear too many sentences starting with "what" unless they are questions. I will change channels in the middle of a show when I hear that sentence structure twice. I'm not too bothered by "My bad," but then I always thought it was "'m I bad", a contraction for "Am I bad." I like it when a stranger says "How are you", which is more common now than "How do you do," but has the same meaning/function of being a polite pleasantry. In Mexico City, everyone I would meet in a social setting would say, "Hola, que tal?" which means "Hi, how's it going?" and an appropriate response was "Que tal?" This was common among the upper class in Mexico City, but if I said it to the more common people from more remote areas, they would say that I sounded like a Mexico City snob. Lars

Awm, what are you talking about? You look GREAT in that picture! You have a bicyclist's legs, too, not fat ones like mine. I've wondered how you can be so athletic when you're carrying extra weight, but it probably depends on how the weight is distributed in your body. Mine has been in my legs (mainly my thighs) all my life, so I was never able to develop the muscles in them. Bike riding is very hard for me. More power to you! And neverdone, it's sounds like you're developing some of those gardening muscles, too. You're burning lots of calories, and soon you'll have a beautiful yard as a result of all your efforts. Robin, I'm glad you're off to a good start! Hope the pressure at work levels off soon. Gibby, remember that old expression "Don't trouble Trouble, till Trouble troubles you"? Well, don't jump to conclusions about having a serious condition till you KNOW; there could be other, more innocuous explanations. But it's good that you're having it checked out. As for me, I've lost 7-1/2 pounds so far, not earthshaking, but ahead of schedule (I wanted to reach this point by the time I went to my reunion). One more pound, and I'll be down to where I was the day I retired. (Then I'll try to get to where I was a year ago.) I've made very exciting progress in my genealogical research this past week, mostly because of the kindness of strangers, who have volunteered to help me with a translation--and a lot more. It fills me with gratitude and makes me want to help others, in turn, with whatever expertise I can offer. Last night, we drove to Philadelphia to celebrate my MIL's 94th birthday and Mother's Day at a "fancy" restaurant. I had salmon cooked to perfection with just a little bit of a delicious sauce and a taste of the rice pilaf, salad with lo-cal dressing, no bread, and no dessert, so I don't think I did much damage. The weather has been very cruddy here, rainy and gloomy, but I'll be walking again as soon as the sun comes out. Hang in there, everybody! And Happy Mother's Day to all of you who are moms. Sue