Fused flowers or conjoint (siamese) twins, that is correct. I noticed this phenomenom predominantly in white/red striped cultivars. It is a malformation among several other possible alterations like flowers with only for or five flower segments, or, once noticed on a scape of a white blooming cultivar, the transformation of a pedicle (=stalk which is holding the individual flower) into a complete, "secondary" scape with bracteous leaves and buds within. Or, what I observed once in a seedling with red blooms, a branched pedicle with two flowers. The blooms of Hippeastrums appear to be rather susceptible to these and other "modifications" - on the other hand I noticed a scape of a Jacobean (Aztec) lily, Sprekelia formosissima, with two seemingly complete flowers on one scape. But, those flowers WERE fused at the very base, thus originating from one pedicle like the fused Hippeastrum flower in the picture above. As to the cultivar; no it is not Appleblossom. In Appleblossom, the central pink veining is not deeper (stronger) as compared to the more diffused pink color in the periphery, AND, the white midribs in Appleblossom are broader.

I sure don't see any veneer there. Esp. the drawer fronts. I could just about see elm, too. But it's very uncommon to see furniture in elm, short of slab Hitchcock chair seats. I'd expect chestnut to have a finer grain. And not all of it has to be wormy! Once the trees started dying en masse, there were wormy standing dead trees to be used, but before the Great Chestnut Blight, the wood was sound. Casey

your picture didnt upload

Agree it's probably from a mass produced set in 40's give or take, but if you can get clearer, brighter photos & ask in Antiques forum, some there are heavy into furniture restoration & refinishing, they can help you with more details (wood, design, etc.) Be sure to open a drawer and take pics of joinery (joints where side of drawer meets front), that always helps.