All you Stove people (Culinarian especially)
Russ Barnard
8 years ago
last modified: 8 years ago
Featured Answer
Sort by:Oldest
Comments (12)
Russ Barnard
8 years agoRelated Discussions
You do know I hate you all -- especially you apple guys and gals!
Comments (13)Denninmi...I'm in the same place. I've got 4 trees in pots now, with no idea where they will eventually go. (one is an apple, as a matter of fact). (before you think I'm not even close, realize I've got 30+ figs in pots ranging from 2 gal up to 25 gal as well...not to mention the passionflowers and bamboos). I do have an autumn olive that I will likely remove, but its placement makes doing so a huge undertaking and I would have to do more than just cut it at ground level because I would want the planting space. I've not had much success grafting either. I had two that looked quite promising a couple years ago. They were too interesting looking to the squirrels or possums or something though as they were victims of something. After that I gave up. (I'll likely try again sooner or later though ~Chills oh, yeah...btw...the persimmon is leafing out well. The tops of the leaders were looking like they were dead, but slowly they are pushing their buds as well. Maybe I'll get fruit this year...time will tell...See MoreSimmering Culinarian(, batman)! [photo heavy - ignore if on dialu
Comments (150)After cooking on and adjusting my CC for the past four months or so I think I have come to the conclusion, as others have, that you will never get a CC with its current burner configuration to get low enough for most of us regardless of how you adjust the "Simmer" screw or igniters. I am not going to get hung up on the "Book" definition of "Simmer". Why would I make such a bold statement? The CC burner has 92 ports or holes � 36 in the outer ring (39%), 36 in the middle ring (39%) and 20 (22%) in the inner ring. Let�s ASSUME for the sake of the discussion that all of the ports are the same and the output is equally divided between the 92 ports at all settings. Now look at the picture below: As posted at the start of this thread this is how one of my burners is adjusted � no flame in the outer ring and no "Clicking". If you follow my calculations above this means this burner is operating at 61% of the burners total capacity and much lower than most of the burners shown on this thread. This week end I cooked two pot roasts at the same time on the CC. One was in a 6 � qt Lodge enameled, cast iron pot and the other in a 13" aluminum oval roaster. Both had a 3 to 4 pound roast, broth, veggies, etc. On "Simmer" this burner produced a temperature of 205F with more bubbles that I would call a low simmer and the other burner was 207F with bubbles. I believe the 92 or 56 ports (the inner and middle rings) will never be able to be adjusted to produce a low enough Btu output to satisfy the average cook. This is why myself and several others believe that CC will ultimately have to redesign the burner to something like a single 20 port ring (like the inner ring on the current burner) with the appropriate office and air shutter to achieve a true "Low Simmer". I would to see Mr. Kalsi and Capital produce a burner that had a range of something like 100 Btu to 23,000 Btu, but I don�t think it can be done and I know the current burner is no that adjustable. Side Note: Has any manufacturer ever published the Btu output of its burners at its lowest setting? If they have I surly have not been able to find it. All they publish is the MAXIMUM output and I have no idea what the lowest setting is when expressed as a percentage of the maximum....See MoreCapital Culinarian - Are you guys serious?
Comments (150)It wasn't your providing the link that I was referring to, gregl, it was another post further down that seemed to be citing the thing as if it had the slightest veracity whatsoever. It doesn't hold any weight at all other than it expresses the opinions of the corporate leadership of Capital. In fact, I have reason to question the veracity of the document right at the outset based upon the statement that Surjit Kalsi "founded the concept of the high-end, commercial-quality range for the home while working at U.S. Range Company." The guy who "founded the idea" was Fred Carl Jr., a 4th generation building contractor from Mississippi, after his wife told him she preferred an old Chambers or commercial stove to anything on the market at the time. He took his idea around to several manufacturers to see if they could or would build it for him. Kalsi may have worked on a later version of it but it sure as heck wasn't his idea....See MoreCalling all "high-end" stove heretics
Comments (9)"The biggest thing I would miss would be the extra depth allowing you to use bigger pans on all the burners." Agreed. My favorite pans tend to be larger diameter ones, and I do enough entertaining that I find a real convenience in having the extra topside real estate of the "pro-style" ranges. OTOH, there are less expensive choices in major brand ranges that might (or might not) suit you well. The GE Cafe all-gas and dual fuel models, for example. They look like slide-in ranges without the side-overhangs, and allow the same kind of pot spacing you get on "pro-style" ranges. The current Cafe models have been available for a couple of years and the reviews here are pretty favorable. The current models do not have the design issues (like the oven venting onto the control knobs) that plagued some of the original versions from four years ago. The potential downside is that the back burners on the Cafe stoves are small. That may or may not pose difficulties depending on whether need them for higher-heat applications with large pots. The GE Cafe stoves have large ovens that bake very evenly and have good convection features. (For example, you can run convection with the upper heating element for browning and convection roasting.) While you can't fit a full size sheet pan in the GE range's ovens (the ovens are not quite wide enough) but that is only a problem if you use full size commercial sheet pans. The largest pans that most of us home cooks use are the equivalent of a commercial half sheet pan. Unlike the Wolf AG units you have been used to, there are a lot of oven features (Sabbath modes, probe and timer controlled roasting, etc.). The tradeoff is that the complex electronics that give you the features --- well, stove heat can eventually lead to circuit board failures and the boards are expensive to replace. Hard numbers are difficult to come by but, judging from the membership surveys in Consumer Reports, it seems that somewhere around 4 to 6% of GE ranges will fail in the first five years and most of those failures seem to be related to the electronic controller boards. Many people seem to be having no problem with running self-cleaning on ten year old GE ranges. OTOH, the controller board in my former GE Profile failed after 11 years, and, at that point, I was no longer interested in statistical probabilities. The BS with a grill sounds like it would be a good option for you. You could always buy a couple of plug in induction hobs if you needed more burners occasionally. Agreed, again, but there can be some practical limitations to using portable induction units in small kitchens. It depends on how small the kitchen is and how many electrical circuits it has. Portable induction units mostly tend to be 16 inches (or more) deep and 14 inches wide which consumes counter space at the same time that you are doing the kind of large-scale cooking that needs the most counter-space for prep. The electrical limitation is that the better portable induction burners are 1800-watt units which, like a microwave, pretty much max out a typical 120v circuit. So, to use two portable units, you need to run each on a separate circuit and have the circuits separate from the ones used by your fridge and MW. (You can use the MW circuit as long as you don't try to run the MW at the same time.) Same limitations apply, btw, when using electric griddles, electric frying pans and some slow-cookers (aka "Crock pots")....See MoreRuss Barnard
8 years agoRuss Barnard
8 years agoRuss Barnard
8 years agoUser
8 years agoDebbi Branka
8 years ago
Related Stories
FUN HOUZZ10 Things People Really Don’t Want in Their Homes
No love lost over fluorescent lights? No shocker there. But some of these other hated items may surprise you
Full StoryHOUSEKEEPINGCan-Do Cleaning Strategies for Busy People
While you dream of having a maid (to go with the cook and chauffer), this simplified cleaning routine can keep your real-world home tidy
Full StoryGREAT HOME PROJECTSPower to the People: Outlets Right Where You Want Them
No more crawling and craning. With outlets in furniture, drawers and cabinets, access to power has never been easier
Full StoryKITCHEN DESIGNWhat to Know When Choosing a Range Hood
Find out the types of kitchen range hoods available and the options for customized units
Full StoryKITCHEN DESIGNPaging All Foodies: Your Banquette Is Ready
Please follow us to these 7 gorgeous dining nooks designed for everything from haute cuisine to s'mores
Full StoryDIY PROJECTSHide All Those Wires in a DIY Charging Station
Keep your gadgets handy and charged with a flexible storage board you can design yourself
Full StoryKITCHEN DESIGNToday’s Coffee Stations Have All Kinds of Perks
Some of these features are so over the top that they will give you a jolt
Full StoryHOUZZ TOURSHouzz Tour: Usonian-Inspired Home With All the Wright Moves
A Chicago couple's weekend retreat fulfills a long-held dream of honoring architect Frank Lloyd Wright
Full StoryKITCHEN DESIGNStash It All: Know the 3 Zones of Kitchen Storage
Organize storage space around your kitchen’s main activities for easier cooking and flow
Full StoryGARDENING GUIDESNew Ways to Think About All That Mulch in the Garden
Before you go making a mountain out of a mulch hill, learn the facts about what your plants and soil really want
Full Story
Deck The Halls