Retiring to vs. Retiring from
15 years ago
Featured Answer
Sort by:Oldest
Comments (36)
- 15 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
Related Discussions
My Budget: Debt vs. Savings. vs. Retirement
Comments (5)Hi glavinsolo, When you buy your home, do you plan to cash in your MFs in order to achieve a down payment? You don't say what kind they are, but with expected rate of return of 8% I assume that they're equity-based. The expense rate of 0.5% makes me wonder about that, though, as few charge that low. If you plan to liquidate within a couple of years, if the markets go down, you may be an unhappy camper when it comes time to reclaim the investment. On the other hand, if you have the certificates issued, you can take them to a financial institution to use them as collateral for a loan ... ... which will work if your growth rate on the investment is greater than the rate you pay on your mortgage, after allowing for income tax cost and deductibility in each case. That way, you convert that investment from being a short-term one into a longer-term one, which reduces your short-term risk. Be aware, though, that a financial institution will be unwilling to loan you more than 50% (or at most 60%) of the value of the asset. But you carry some risk if you draw near the limit of what they'll allow, for if the value of the asset goes down and slips below double the value of the loan, the lender will want either some cash to reduce the amount of the loan, or some other assets to underwrite the support for the loan. And they'll want it today ... tomorrow at the latest. With regard to the cost of homes, I'm not familiar with the U.S. markets in general, let alone the ones in your area. But some calculate that the tough times in the housing markets are far from over. I think that it would be well for you to carry on some study of what house prices are doing in the area where you prefer to buy. If you buy early, and house prices continue to reduce, you'll be an unhappy camper, then, as well. Mortgage lenders get quite unhappy if the valuation of the house comes rather close to the amount of the mortgage still owing. If the value goes too low, they'll require that you sell it ... at a loss, of course ... ... or they may choose to foreclose, in which case there'd almost surely be more costs if they sell it than if you do. Which could well mean that they'd be notifying you that you owed them the difference between what you owed on the mortgage, plus costs of repossession and sale, less the amount that they sold it for. Not a pleasant scenario. But one that many who accepted those low-rate mortgages a few years ago will be facing. My feeling is that if I wanted to buy a home in the U.S. these days, I'd be keeping my money in my genes (sorry, "jeans") for a while. There are those who claim that I have some frugal chromosomes in my genes, as a matter of fact. As a matter of fact, my daughter is considering buying accomodation in Arizona, these days. Good wishes as you make your plans. ole joyful...See MoreUnofficial ABB president looking to retire
Comments (150)Breezy I went to Fireclay and Heath Today to finalize my own backsplash. Some info for your consider. Heath tile - several of their glazes have some copper in them. They are all about using traditional natural materials. But this also means that the tile glaze can etch! I tried it with some of the green tiles I had and sure enough I was able to etch a couple of them with lemon juice. I was really disappointed and even considered if I can live with it.. Patina and all that. But I could see the spots in the undercabinet light and DH hated the etches. So reluctantly I have given up the wide hex twist with 3 colors with glossy and matte that I had fallen in love with :( This is not to say that this won't work for you. Not all of their glazes etch. Depending on the colors you want, call Eric their tile manager and see what will work. One more thing - some of their tiles are dark clay body and others are white clay. As the glaze has a lot of dimension, the colors really work better if you select all white clay or all dark clay. Fireclay - Debris series is dark clay body and Vitrail is light clay. Again not advisable to mix tiles between the two. Debris is also a tad thicker tile. Vitrail depending on the color has some crackle in it. It is all organic and not exactly the same. As the tiles have a handmade quality to them, it looked like you can't really get a small tight grout line. Not sure how important this is for you. I finally have decided on backsplash tile from fireclay and have placed my order. They also have this thinner super large format tile that was just awesome. May work in a contemporary kitchen like yours. Lots of zen like colors and you can definitely get small tight grout lines with these. Yolanda who works there is very knowledgeable and helpful. This post was edited by GWlolo on Sun, Mar 24, 13 at 2:55...See MoreWithdrawing funds from retirement for closing costs ?
Comments (8)These opinions are regardin Tradition IRAs -- you did not indicate what type of retirement account you wish to use. 1. You will be paying a 10% early withdrawal fee PLUS paying income taxes on the amount withdrawn. The extra dollars withdrawn may even bump up your income tax bracket. 2. You have the option of taking out the withholding now or covering it at tax time. However, if you do not have enough withheld, you can be penalized at tax time. 3. The only way to take money out of retirement without incurring these tax hits is to return the money to the account with-in 60 days. You do not have to put back the full amount -- if you don't you are only taxed on the amount not put back in....See MoreValue of Forever Home -VS- Personal Retirement Nestegg?
Comments (74)Mrs Pete talk to your pension coordinators about how much each option will cost if you reduce both of your pensions to give the other person a benefit if/when one of you dies. It may not be that much. I've done it. We're 95% sure we'll go with max-pension for me alone -- but we have until March to decide for certain. I'm younger than my husband, I'm in better health, and I come from a family with super long-lived genes (seriously, we joke that we're part vampire 'cause we're kinda un-killable). We're in agreement that naming my husband as beneficiary isn't the wisest choice; yes, it's a gamble, but isn't everything in this discussion a bit of a guess? What I've played with is the idea of naming one of my daughters my beneficiary -- or, and this is the one that really intrigues me -- naming my grandson (who will be born October 2021) as my beneficiary. What intrigues me: I started teaching in 1992. If I were to name this new grandson as my beneficiary and he were to live to 100 (not unlikely), the state would have paid me (or my beneficiary) for 129 years. 30 years of work = 129 years of pay. No wonder companies are distancing themselves from pensions. Why I've decided not to do this: I drew out a timeline including my retirement year, my children's likely retirement years, this grandson's likely retirement years -- and the bottom line is that IF I were to name one of my children as beneficiary, she wouldn't get the money until after her retirement -- money would be nice, obviously, but it'd come late in her life. If I were to name this unborn grandson, he would be well entrenched in his career. I think I can serve them better by maxing the pension and saving /investing a part for them -- and although some assumptions are involved, math supports this idea. My youngest just finished college, and I'm of the opinion that the best way we can help our children is to educate them -- then they have the tools to provide for themselves for the rest of their lives. I'd rather save /invest and be prepared to help that grandson earlier in his life -- see him well educated in his youth rather than feather his middle years /retirement. Also, I can only name one beneficiary. I'd trust either of my daughters to "share nicely" with the rest of the family -- but the grandson is a total unknown. He literally isn't born yet, and IF I left the pension to him, I'd want him to share it with the family (not keep the benefit to himself simply because he has the good luck to be born first in his generation). My goal for my grandson is to invest a lump sum for him (once he's born and has a name and SS number) that will grow so he can have $2000/semester + $2000 as a college graduation gift. We're thinking this will be for his books and incidentals. A good friend of ours just died, leaving 2-year old and a 5-year old grandchildren behind; that's why we're determined to invest a (fairly small) lump sum for our new grandson NOW. If we should die unexpectedly, that money would already be set aside for him, and we'd leave a letter in our Death Notebook explaining our plans for him to have money for each college semester. Good luck on your retirement and be glad that as a teacher you can receive social security as many states do not allow that or the SS is offset by part of the pension. Thanks! Teaching is a job that "pays" only if you stick it out for a whole career (in the same state), and our retirement benefits are good. Yes, I'll be able to collect SS too (not for some years). Yes, I'm in a state that gives teachers SS -- well, I say GIVE, but that's not true. I've paid in quite a bit over the years. Ditto for my pension. What if chasing status gives them happiness? Truthfully, I don't think chasing status can every bring happiness because -- perhaps excepting the Queen -- someone will always have more. Status is a moving target. I myself was turned down for a car loan two years ago with a 800+ credit rating because I had no active credit usage on my report.That would be solely based on income, as no credit use would lower your score a bit anyway. You can have a 500 FICO and get a car loan if you have income that covers the payment. Some 20 years ago -- the last time we financed a car -- the person at the bank jokingly said, "We don't see this often." Our credit score wasn't just good: it was perfect. Some time later -- after we paid off our house -- we found out our credit score had dropped. We were more financially secure, but our credit score was lower. That's when I decided I don't care a fig for credit scores; instead, I care about financial security. This incident really illustrated to me that they are not the same measurement. I think credit scores are important when you're young, but once you're solidly established, their importance diminishes. People are actually pretty crap at putting their money where it will make them the happiest. I do believe that, and it's usually due to poor planning and spur-of-the-moment choices. New clothes and fast food, for example, are short-term pleasures. There are lots of things that I can afford that I probably shouldn't buy. This is definitely true. For all of us. Mrs pete, you say your husband is older than you, he will be 65 in eight years, which will make him 57 now. So you must be retiring at 55 or 60, is this correct? Your sleuthing is quite close to the truth. And when you say should "WE" take social security early do you quality for benefits? Some teachers retirement systems don't pay social security tax and aren't eligible for social security benefits. I live in a state where teachers pay into both teachers' retirement AND SS, so we can collect from both. After one more year of school I'll have 30 years, and I can begin to collect my pension regardless of my age. It'll still be years 'til I can collect SS. If all the above is true I'm going to be honest, I don't see any reason to not say your husband will need to work until he's 66, pay for medicare part B and a supplement. He's already retired, and he's on my teacher insurance. I can continue to insure him after I retire next year, though it's quite expensive -- I'll "get a raise" when he qualifies for Medicare. With cash flow being a concern Not so much a concern as a decision that must be made. Once I retire, we will need to dip into savings of some sort (as long as I'm paying my husband's $$$ insurance and we aren't yet collecting SS). We have investments; the question is, which accounts to use /how logistically to start this process. the difference between 62 and full retirement age is about $500 a month We've "mathed it up" and have decided to take SS at 62. Our thought process: we'd rather take SS and maintain our savings /investments. Once we're gone, SS stops; whereas, if we maintain our actual money, it can be passed on to our children. And we feel that money/investments is more sure than future SS checks. We are seriously considering a credit card like the ones that gain points. Assuming you're not tempted to over-spend, credit card rewards points are the best! We buy every loaf of bread and every gallon of gas with our credit card -- and we "play the game" of paying attention to which spending categories are paying extra this month (so if grocery stores are paying 5% next month, we might put off a big stock-up shopping trip), and we get a couple hundred free dollars every year. We typically use them to buy generous restaurant gift cards for our senior citizen parents for Christmas -- being retired and needing nothing, that's what they love to receive. The dealer will not go down as far on the price for a 0% manufacturer subsidized loan compared to a bank interest loan. I think I'm pretty good at negotiating a car's price. I start by telling the dealer which car I want /insisting that we will discuss one thing and one thing only: the total, out the door price. I never trade in my old car, and I say I'll discuss financing once I know the total price. Thing is, car salesmen do this every day, all day, and they will beat you -- if you allow them to start throwing around multiple numbers. I sit there and say it to the point that they might think I'm simple: - I don't want to talk about payments. I want to talk about the total out-the-door price. - I don't want to talk about financing. I want to talk about the total out-the-door price. - I don't want to talk about add-ons. I want to talk about the total out-the-door price. Only after I have the final price will I say HOW I intend to pay for the car (though I've known from the start). When we bought my new car 12/31/2019, we'd emphasized total out-the-door price, and we'd emphasized that we were tight on funds because we were paying college tuition. I am sure the dealer thought we were poor as church mice (and we were in jeans and sweatshirts), but they were sure they were going to "make up" the low price to which they finally agreed in financing. The guy's eyes just about popped out of his head when I wrote a check for full price. I could see, "Well, damn" in his eyes. We should have had our kid get a credit card, not a debit card, as her first "card" -- she ran into the "you have no credit history" problem when renting her first apartment and had to pay an extra month's deposit.) Yes, I started each of my girls on a checking account and a (small balance) credit card -- not a debit card -- when she was a senior in high school. During that year I encouraged her to use the credit card rather than cash, and I monitored her use /helped her balance her accounts every month. My girls went away to college comfortable using something other than cash. BUT they both needed me to co-sign when it came time to get them an apartment. I have used a debit card for years because I could not see the need for a second credit card although I now have one. We prefer Discover -- it gives the best rewards and we have a long history with them, BUT it isn't accepted everywhere. So I have a second credit card; I change it out every year or so depending upon who's offering me money to take a new card. One of the advantages of using a national bank is that I can find their ATMs almost everywhere so there are not ATM fees. Yes, when my husband was still working /traveling for work, we kept our checking at a national bank. Now that he's no longer working, we use a local credit union (where I've had accounts since I was 17), which treats us much better. When we travel, we stop at grocery stores fairly often for this or that, and it's easy to get "cash back" from them instead of ATMs. Years ago that wasn't a choice. Doesn't this depend on the survivor benefit? When my dad dies, his pension dies with him. A friend who has been widowed is not able to specify another survivor now that her husband has passed--he would have gotten a 50% survivor benefit if he outlived her, but now the pension dies with her. If my husband dies, I get his entire IRA and if I predecease him, our two daughters get the whole thing. That's why it's so important to choose carefully -- once you're retired, you're locked into the choices you made. I did not understand but based on my age at the time of his retirement it reduced by $35. Was not going to complain. But then he selected 100% spousal death pension benefit. My pension increased because the offset to provide him a 50% pension ceased. Neither amount that the pensions were reduced was very much. Couples do need to look at what both parties have as far as pension's and death benefits such as life insurance and can you continue with the employee health coverage. Yes, and since all of us have a different set of assets as we approach retirement, we have to study our choices -- and what's right for one couple may not be right for another....See More- 15 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 15 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 15 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 15 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 15 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 15 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 15 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 15 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 15 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 15 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 15 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 15 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 12 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 12 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 12 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 12 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 11 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 11 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 11 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 11 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 11 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 11 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 11 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 11 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 11 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 11 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 11 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 10 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 10 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 10 years agolast modified: 10 years ago
- 10 years ago
- 9 years ago
- 9 years ago
- 5 months agolast modified: 5 months ago
Related Stories

HOUZZ TOURSHouzz Tour: Prairie Grain Bin Turned Bucolic Retirement Home
An agrarian structure and a big dream combine in this one-of-a-kind home that celebrates 250 acres of Montana grasslands
Full Story
REMODELING GUIDESWhen Retirement Came Early, a Couple Headed for the Hills
A Seattle pair turn their part-time home into a full-time one, remodeling it to gain views and help it stand up to snow, sun and wind
Full Story
HOUZZ TOURSMy Houzz: A Portland Couple Builds Their Dream Retirement Home
An Oregon couple emphasizes indoor-outdoor living and accessible design in their energy-efficient, visitor-friendly house
Full Story0

LIFERetirement Reinvention: Boomers Plot Their Next Big Move
Choosing a place to settle in for the golden years? You're not alone. Where boomers are going and what it might look like
Full Story
HOUZZ TOURSWe Can Dream: Rural Retirement Home a Haven of Beauty and Tranquillity
A retired couple builds a spacious Japanese-inspired indoor-outdoor sanctuary to enjoy with extended family
Full Story
HOUZZ TOURSHouzz Tour: Retiring to a Midcentury Modern Gem
Vintage furniture fits the tone of this 1950s home, designed by modernist A. Quincy Jones, to a T
Full Story
HOMES AROUND THE WORLDHouzz Tour: Retired Soldier Creates Her Dream Home in Sweden
A Swedish family's fantasy of a rural retreat becomes a reality after years of renovations
Full Story
HOUZZ TOURSHouzz Tour: From Summer Cottage to Full-Time Home
A retired NHL player and his family expand their former vacation home with a big addition and an interesting side-by-side design
Full Story
ARCHITECTUREHouzz Tour: A Salvaged Airplane Becomes a Soaring Hillside Home
Made from a retired 747, this modern house in Malibu shows how architecturally stunning reuse can be
Full Story
COLORNo Need to Shrink From Violet
With shades from soft to rich and uses from a droplet to a wave, there’s a violet that will work for you
Full Story
maime