I never thought the family had anything to do with it. I think the police could have tied them to it by now if they had; plus the male DNA they found on the panties didn't match them. I kind of thought it may have been a stranger who did one of their open house Christmas tours just a few weeks before. Or, possibly some pedopile linked with the beauty pageants. I really wish they would solve it once and for all! Hopefully conducting this new round of interviews will help.

I read this also. And they want it to be put on the child's record permantly. If the parents don't do something to stop this NOW, what will the child do in the future. They also said the girl liked it, maybe some gentle counseling for both parents are needed, because the boy has been in trouble before for??? Or maybe something is going on in the homes----

Why would the family do all that horrible stuff to the little girl just to "cover up for Burke"? OK say the kid hit her in the head, wouldn't it be a lot more logical to make up some sort of an accident like she fell down some stairs instead of coming up with a kidnapping and a sexual assault and tying her all up into some contraption that the rope was embedded into the child's neck. I mean, they'd have to be crazy to do all that. And if they were crazy people, wouldn't someone have ever come forward and said that those people were crazy nuts? I don't recall anyone saying the family was a bunch of bat sh*t crazy loonies! Another thing, if Burke did kill her, he was NINE YEARS OLD, it's not like he would have gone to prison!

I haven't yet read but a few of the comments on this thread. However, FYI, I did post a long comment and summary on this thread: [https://www.houzz.com/discussions/anyone-see-fitzpatricks-show-re-jonbenet-dsvw-vd~4172709[(https://www.houzz.com/discussions/anyone-see-fitzpatricks-show-re-jonbenet-dsvw-vd~4172709)