Hi Harriethomeowner.

That's not an unattractive loveseat, but in a living room--which is, ironically, often the least-used room in houses nowadays--comfort is the primary consideration, and there's no way I'd ditch a full size, nap-friendly sofa for a dinky little settee or loveseat, no matter how pretty it might look in the store on some website.

People with big ol' honking great rooms or media rooms often say that since no one ever uses their TV-deprived living rooms anyway, they just use them for show, and that comfort is therefore not an issue. Call me out of the loop, but I can't think of anything sillier than creating a room that you know right from the getgo is uncomfortable. Maybe those folks should ask themselves if that discomfort level is not why no one ever uses those rooms, instead of the other way around. When I see a vacant desert of a room like that--and I see a lot of them these days--I see a textbook case of cause-&-effect, and I rememeber the grim, stiff parlors of the old days. I mean there was a reason they used those rooms for funerals. But like they say, those who cannot remember the lessons of the past are doomed to repeat them.

And if this room, unlike so many others, isn't a superfluous vestigial space in a supersized house, but, rather, a real room that you actually use--and that's what its current comfy look says to me--then all the above goes double. If your LR ain't broke, don't fix it.

Do I love the current upholstery? Not really, but in a room this relaxed & friendly-looking, I could live with it (especially if I painted the walls something compatible with said upholstery, something other than their current bland color, which, rather than lightening up the room, simply makes everything else in the room look dark & muddy) although I might consider re-upholstering your existing pieces, if the fabric's showing wear (and with a bunch of cats roaming around, it probably is) or if you're just simply looking for a new look.

OK, Question 2: can you have too many legs? Sure you can. That's why upholstery shops often add skirts when they reupholster, so rooms don't start looking like Leg City. But since, just as with human bodies, all chairs are not born equal, some chairs need skirts while other chairs look great bare-legged. There is no one answer that applies to everyone. Or every chair. But as far as the matching-woods bit goes--or matching fabrics, for that matter--forget it. Life's hard enough without worrying about inconsequential stuff like that.

No, if you ask me, all your welcoming room really needs is a new paint job, some colored or opaque paper shades to create interesting patterns on the walls & some light-colored touches here & there. What it doesn't need--not with those cats--is solid color fabrics. Not pale ones, anyway. And not velvet. But you've got the main thing--the comfort--down just fine. Which means you're already way ahead of a lot of people.

Regards,
MAGNAVERDE.

I did the livingroom sofa exchange for a loveseat once. It was a traditional Queen Anne; beautiful to look at, not bad to sit on - but definitely not a piece of furniture to lounge on or to be able to "put your feet up" comfortably, so I sold it with the house. That's certainly not the case with all loveseats, simply my experience with mine.

I have the lots of legs look in my inherited home. I'm living with my folks' country French which was purchased in 1954 - excellent quality, perfect condition, serviceable - just not my style and I'm slowly replacing it with the cherry Q. Anne pieces which have been biding their time in the basement. The too many legs look can be eliminated by adding even one piece upholstered to the floor. Or a cabinet or chest to the floor as opposed to the usual end or occasonal tables. I replaced a leggy console with a shell carved blockfront chest. I'm betwixt and between with redecorating, needing a new sofa and to have an occasional chair recovered. This particular chair and any new sofa will not show legs so anything else in the room can.

I'm not good at helping others with color choices - my old house livingroom is eggshell, I believe - plaster walls, lots of painted woodwork and mouldings - which coordinates with everything. Not very daring, but there are other rooms in which to be somewhat bolder.

But Magnaverde, that settee is SO comfortable. The seat is 40 inches deep, so a great size to curl up and read. I wish they made it about a foot longer (it's 69 inches). If we get it, we will probably get a sturdy microfiber for the upholstery.

The old stuff in our living room is extremely high quality, a beautiful and unusual tapestry fabric. It's getting more and more faded and worn, and both pieces are sagging and a bit lumpy. That's why we're considering replacing them.
But I'm still not convinced that their time has come yet. Not sure if they have gone from having character to just being seedy.

Any color recommendations for the walls? The room is pretty dark, except for in the morning between 8 and 10, depending on the time of year.

Count me in on considering a good napworthy couch mandatory for a living room that one actually lives in rather than just looks at. I just bought a settee but it's a supplement to a super-comfy couch, not all by its lonesome. Several apartments ago we only had a loveseat instead of a proper couch because we simply couldn't get a couch up the three narrow, winding flights of stairs in the 1860s tenement building, and it drove us both crazy.

I'll also be apologetically honest, I don't think either of the two pieces you're considering play well with the interesting old chair you're keeping - there's just something about it that isn't working for. Interesting old chair would all too likely stick out like a sore thumb. :-(

Have you looked into having your old set reupholstered? If it's "extremely high quality" it probably has a good solid frame that can be repadded to get rid of the sags and lumps and make it comfy again.

I'm not a professional decorator, but I like the look of that settee. It looks comfy. That said, I absolutely do NOT like the look of the chairs, and I hate matchy matchy furniture in any room.

IMHO, the room should look like yours does now -- as if it evolved over time. As soon as you get three pieces of furniture in the exact same fabric, it looks like you walked into a showroom, said "I'll take that" and plopped it all down in your room without a second thought. My preference is always to make it look like I fell in love with each piece because each chair or sofa or settee or end table just was so comfortable and so "me," that it sort of followed me home, like a new puppy, and it just happened to blend effortlessly with what I already had. You should tie the fabrics together, of course, but do it by picking up the pretty blue in a throw pillow, a rug, a vase, a piece of art on the wall. Make sure the color travels into the next room, too, to ease the transition.

I agree with the others -- a living room should be for living in. Reading chairs, a good napping spot, a game table. Ours even has the TV (going against tradition, I know, but we use that room everyday; the family room has the computers/games in it so we use it everyday, too, just differently).

I vote for the comfy looking settee -- although you might want to look for a longer one -- and COMFY chairs that don't match. What about a smooshy leather chair and then a traditional chair + ottoman in a pattern/floral (I'm not a huge "floral" fan, but we found a floral at Ethan Allen that was a little more stylized that works beautifully on a little tufted reading chair with legs; we paired it with a chunky leather ottoman that had a worn look and a moss-green chenille on the sofa; had some pillows made for the sofa out of the same floral; it all blends nicely together without looking matchy matchy).

If you don't want to work with an ID, I would recommend going someplace like EA, where their designers can help with color/fabric and furniture selections to help create a more evolved over time look.

A lot of interesting comments. Thanks.

Magnaverde, your Rule No. 12 also describes the way I dress. :)

I agree with much of what you say. Yep on the wall color; the PO of our house picked that, and we just haven't gotten around to painting (after 9 years).

I was studying the old couch and chair the other day, and I realized that they are actually two completely different styles. The original purchaser (my sister's ex-husband's grandmother) must have had them custom upholstered. My sister was about to send them off to Goodwill 15 years ago, but I rescued them and have been using them ever since.

I wish there was someplace else I could put that settee. I'm wondering if it would be nice near the front door, maybe in a deep red. Right now, there's a storage bench that was supposed to be where we kept our shoes, but it's not working very well. There are still shoes all over the floor by the door (and there's just two of us living here).

If we ever get around to painting, that far wall might look interesting in an accent color as a gallery -- I have a lot of paintings and other artwork that I haven't found a place for. You may be able to tell that what's up there now just got thrown there kind of haphazardly.

We use our living room a lot. It adjoins the dining room, and we eat dinner there every night, and play with the cats, and sit there and read and entertain friends. Our TV is gathering dust in the basement. I play that piano occasionally, though my good piano is elsewhere in the house.

Speaking of which -- got to go practice. But thanks again for the input. I definitely need to think about this some more.

Just bumping this up in case anyone else has any other advice or insights. TIA.