Houzz Logo Print
joyfulguy

Not use PreAuthorzd Remittance(PAR) to fund charities, churches

12 years ago

Reasons that I don't plan to use PreAuthorized Remittance (PAR) to fund charities and churches

For a number of years I've written cheques to support a variety of charitable enterprises and some churches which I contact infrequently, as well as the only way permitted to support a political party.

For some time a number of the charities have asked me to consider providing support monthly by way of pre-authorized remittance, and recently churches I attend regularly are asking that, as well.

While it is my responsibility to ensure that there is enough money in the account to cover each request that comes in ... as I am getting old and somewhat forgetful (some might even say rather decrepit, though my claim of having done even a half-assed job of operating about a mile of garden row last year might negate that) I may have neglected it. Were I to agree to that request, in such a situation, what would happen when half a dozen agencies sent their monthly request to my bank? It seems to me that there would be quite a lot of confusion before the matter got all straightened out.

My bank's customer service representative says that the fee when there are insufficient funds to cover a cheque when presented for payment ... is $45.00 per item. Were four or five agencies to make such a request, that would produce a penalty of $180.00 - 225.00: what several receive for a whole year!

If ten make such an unfillable request: $450.00 penalty, more than most of my charities get per year.

As I've been supporting about 30 charities and 5 churches: too much possibility of major penalty levies.

Were I to agree that a dozen charities access my account monthly, that would be 144 such transactions annually. I expect that soon my bank would rescind their fee-free operation of this senior's account.

When I sell a stock or mutual fund with major appreciation and deposit the proceeds into my bank account, then write cheques to the charities and churches, when income tax preparation time comes, as the pensions and investment income are the basic low-tax-rate income, I must pay tax at my highest rate on one-half of the capital gain on that investment. That charitable support is with after-tax money.

However ... if I transfer title to that stock or mutual fund to a charity ... they give me a tax-deductible receipt for the full value ... and I pay zero tax on the capital gain. That support for the charities is with before-tax money.

For three years I have done that with the Community Foundation, and United Way, and for modest fee they have forwarded amounts which I have designated to a list of agencies which I wish to support. As one didn't wish to undergo the admin. cost for transmissions of under $500.00 each, I'm sure that they would not look with favour on a request for monthly or even quarterly transmissions. The United Church Foundation was interested ... but at present their administrator requires $300.00 per recipient.

So if there aren't enough funds in the account to pay the small monthly remittance,

- there'll be confusion in clearing up the mess, (if the charity charges a fee, it'll likely be their last)
-and there'll be costly penalties levied by the bank.
- The bank may be unhappy with so much monthly traffic.
- I prefer to support charities and churches with before-tax rather than after-tax money.
______________________

This is the situation in the province of Ontario, Canada at the end of 2013 - rules may be very different in your jurisdiction(s).

ole joyful

Comments (8)

0