Houzz Logo Print
jyl_gw

My Very Own Vacuuming Peasant (Warning: Robot Content)

14 years ago

A few weeks ago, I watched an episode of "America's Test Kitchen" in which they gave an enthusiastic thumbs-up to the iRobot automatic vacuum cleaner. ATK's testing is pretty credible to me, so this got my attention.

Then we stayed with some friends who have two of the Rhoombas working in their house and auxiliary building. I watched the robots work and noticed that, although my friends are not enthusiastic housekeepers, their floors were nicely clean.

When my wife saw the Rhoomba 550 at Costco, we decided to give modern feudalism a try. For $280 we now have our own robotic peasant slaving away on the ground floor of the johnliu estate.

My 13 y/o got the job of reading the manual and setting up "Robbie". I programmed the robot to vacuum every day at midnight. My son amuses himself by commanding Robbie to work during the day as well, sometimes carrying stuffed animals. There are no days off. It is a merciless existence for our robotic slave.

So far, we are quite pleased with his work. The layout here is challenging, with lots of furniture looming, chair forests, cul-de-sacs, and other traps and obstacles. Robbie so far has about a 80% track record of finding his way home to his recharging dock before his batteries give out. We've twice had to rescue him from box canyons and place him back on his dock.

He does not have much suck-power, relying more on beating brushes and rubber scrapers, but even so, each time he runs, he fills his bin with dust, lint, dirt, cat hair, and other schmutz. Apparently we are not as un-slovenly as we thought. SWMBO says it is because I've been living as a piggish bachelor for several weeks. I say the house is always this way. Although, I say it to myself.

As you Asimov fans know, robots are supposed to obey the Three Laws.

"1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.

2. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.

3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law."

We haven't had a chance to see if Robbie would, let's say, self-destruct rather than stub a human's toe. But I have faith in his gentle touch with piano legs and carpet edges. The cats are learning to ignore the intruder. I wasn't having much luck leashing them to the canister vacuum anyway.

Bottom-line, the ground floor now gets partly vacuumed every day, and it takes me less than a minute each time (emptying the bin, maybe replacing the robot on his dock). I can live with this.

FYI, for the curious, here's how these things work. The robot's movement is mostly random. It might vacuum the dining room, the living room, the foyer, etc, it is all up to chance. It has some preprogrammed behavior to work its way around obstacles, will spiral around particularly dirty spots, can detect large obstacles well enough to slow down before bumping them, and knows not to leap off cliffs - stairs, if you will. When the battery runs low, the robot starts looking for the infrared light on its dock; if it repeatedly runs out of battery before reaching the dock, it starts looking for home a bit earlier.

Basically, think of how a beetle moves, blindly guided by its feelers, and that's a Rhoomba.

Comments (16)

Sponsored
Wannemacher Interiors
Average rating: 5 out of 5 stars26 Reviews
Customized Award-Winning Interior Design Solutions in Franklin Cnty OH