http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2012/09/20/monsantos-gm-corn-and-cancer-in-rats-real-scientists-deeply-unimpressed-politics-not-science-perhaps/ "Their claim is that the rats fed GM corn and Roundup got more such tumours earlier than the control group. The criticism of this finding is that the control group was simply too small to allow such an observation to be made with any certainty. And they have not conducted, or at least not presented, the standard statistical tests which would allow they or us to determine whether the results were the outcome of pure blind chance." http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/09/anti-gmo-researchers-used-science-publication-to-manipulate-the-press/ "Any journalist that wanted to receive an advance copy was required to sign a non-disclosure agreement before receiving one. That agreement prohibited the outlet from sharing the results with any outside experts before the embargo lifted. In other words, if a press outlet wanted to be one of the first to cover the story, it would have to run the story without having any experts sanity check the paper." "The embargo lifted during a live press conference from the researchers, hosted in London in cooperation with the Sustainable Food Trust. The SFT conveniently had a press release prepared; a release claiming that the research was "supported by independent research organization, CRIIGEN." However, this neglected to note that the paper's lead author, Eric Seralini, is on the CRIIGEN board." Conflict of interest, and keeping the newspapers from doing any fact checking before publication ... that's not accepted protocol. https://embargowatch.wordpress.com/2012/09/21/stenographers-anyone-gmo-rat-study-co-sponsor-engineered-embargo-to-prevent-scrutiny/ " One of the main reasons for embargoes �" if you take many journals at their word �" is to give reporters more time to write better stories. Part of how you do that is talking to outside experts. And scientists �" ones interested in science, anyway, not those interested in spin and political points �" should welcome that kind of scrutiny."

There are detail shops around me that do an inside shampoo for anywhere from $30 to $50. I don't think you need to spend $150. One of the places near me is a White Glove Car wash. My sister just had her interior shampooed there on Monday for $40 with a coupon. Look in the phone book and make some calls. I don't think it will be as expensive as you think, and I think this is the only way to get it all out.

Well.....where is it? In the carpet? or hiding in the cracks of the upholstery? When you find it all and clean it up....the smell will be gone...mostly...LOL! I am remembering dropping a 2 qt container of salsa on the pavement next to my car....with the door open! It was everywhere! And smelled of garlic for weeks!....don't dispair and keep the windows open!! Linda C

You may want to take it to a car wash that does detailing. They have a chemical that will break it up and then they vacuum it out. Have no idea of the cost, but I would do it ASAP.